Family and Kinship Classification Systems as Proxy Indicator of Support Networks in Nandi Culture, Kenya

Families in all their configurations are the key social groups within which different generations are embedded and supported. Following the recent demographic trends and shifts in the traditional family types and relationships, there is a need to explore actual lived kinship relational and support dynamics. Every kinship relations of a society are sustained through sets of kinship terminologies or kinship terms of reference which are signals on role expectations of those with particular labels. Kinship terminologies classify the kinship universe which helps every individual to reckon his/her kin members. The kinship terms are the vocabulary of differentiations and classifications of kinsmen with attendant role relations. However, little is understood on the mapping of kinship terms and their appropriate symbolic roles within the context of support systems in the Nandi culture. This paper explores the understanding of the concept of ‘family’ and kinship terms as indicators of support contexts within Nandi community of Kenya. The study findings indicate that, among the Nandi, family relationships are often constituted by individuals with different generational identities and world views whose connections are interactional and transactional. In this study, one of the potentially most important domains that characterizes family relationships among the Nandi people is the support and assistance that is exchanged between individuals. At the family level, the relationships are based on reciprocity and exchange. The study findings further indicate diversity in definitions of family, kinship and the embeddedness of individuals in their social networks. The study contributes to debate on how kinship classification systems work in the new era of digitalization of kinship practices in contemporary families.

Family, kinship, kinship terminology, support

1. Allan, G., Hawker, S., & Crow, G. (2001). Family diversity and change in Britain and Western Europe. Journal of Family Issues, 22(7), 819-837. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Becker, B., & Charles, N. (2006). Layered meanings: The construction of ‘the family’ in the interview. Community, Work and Family, 9(2), 101-122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Charles, N., Davies, C., & Harris, C. (2008). Changing families. In Families in transition (pp. 53-80). Policy Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chesaina, C. (1991). Oral literature of the Kalenjin. East African Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chung, P. H. (2019). Race and Family in 20th Century United States (Doctoral dissertation, UC Berkeley). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (2003). Understanding families as systems. Current directions in psychological science, 12(5), 193-196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Davies, H., & Christensen, P. (2018). Sharing spaces: children and young people negotiating intimate relationships and privacy in the family home. In Families, Intergenerationality, and Peer Group Relations (pp. 27-49). Springer, Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dziebel, G. 2007. The Genius of Kinship: The Phenomenon of Human Kinship and the [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Global Diversity of Kinship Terminologies. Youngstown: Cambria Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Edwards, L. M., & Lopez, S. J. (2006). Perceived family support, acculturation, and life satisfaction in Mexican American youth: A mixed-methods exploration. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Entwisle, B., Faust, K., Rindfuss, R. R., & Kaneda, T. (2007). Networks and contexts: Variation in the structure of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1495-1533. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65-81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Furstenberg, F. F., Harris, L. E., Pesando, L. M., & Reed, M. N. (2020). Kinship practices among alternative family forms in Western industrialized societies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(5), 1403-1430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Government of Kenya (GoK). (2010). The Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Nairobi: Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hareven, Tamara K. (2015). History of Family and Kinship. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 8: 738–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Harris, S. R. (2008). What is family diversity? Objective and interpretive approaches. Journal of family issues, 29(11), 1407-1425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). (2020). 2019 Kenya Population and Housing Census. Government Printer, Nairobi Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kroeber, A. L. (1909). Classificatory systems of relationship. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 39, 77-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1971). The elementary structures of kinship (No. 340). Beacon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lowie, R. H. (1928). A note on relationship terminologies. American Anthropologist, 30(2), 263-267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Madhavan, S., Clark, S., Beguy, D., Kabiru, C. W., & Gross, M. (2017). Moving beyond the household: Innovations in data collection on kinship. Population Studies, 71(1), 117-132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mare, R. D. (2011). A multigenerational view of inequality. Demography, 48(1), 1-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. McCarthy, J. R. (2012). The powerful relational language of ‘family’: Togetherness, belonging and personhood. The Sociological Review, 60(1), 68-90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. McCarthy, J. R., Holland, J., & Gillies, V. (2003). Multiple perspectives on the 'family' lives of young people: methodological and theoretical issues in case study research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 1-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mdhluli, T. D., et al., (2024). Unveiling the Role of Hahani (Paternal Aunts) in the VaTsonga Culture of South Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Morgan, L. H. (1871). Systems of consanguinity and affinity of the human family (No. 218). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social Structure. New York: Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Murphy, M. (2011). Long-term effects of the demographic transition on family and kinship networks in Britain. Population and Development Review, 37, 55-80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Murdock, G. P. (1968). Patterns of sibling terminology. Ethnology 7: l–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Murdock, G. P. (1970). Kin term patterns and their distribution. Ethnology 9: 165–208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Pericliev, V. (2011). Profiling language families by their kin term patterns: A computational approach. LINCOM Etymological Studies 02. München: Lincom GmbH. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ng’etich, B. K. (2024). African Matrimonial Relations: The Nandi Marital and Household Setup. Journal of African Interdisciplinary Studies, 8(6), 101 – 133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1941). The study of kinship systems. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 71(1/2), 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1924). The mother's brother in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 21(11), 542-555. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1913). Three tribes of western Australia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 43:143-194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Reczek, R., Stacey, L., & Thomeer, M. B. (2023). Parent–adult child estrangement in the United States by gender, race/ethnicity, and sexuality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 85(2), 494-517. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Schneider, D. M. (1984). A Critique of the Study of Kinship. University of Michigan Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Seltzer, J. A. (2019). Family change and changing family demography. Demography, 56(2), 405-426. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Trautmann, T. R. (1981). Dravidian Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Widmer, E.D. (2010), Family Configurations: A Structural Approach to Family Diversity, London: Ashgate. doi: 10 .4324/ 9781315581903. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar