Evaluating the Effectiveness of Tax Reliefs and Rebates in Reducing Financial Burden for Malaysian Taxpayers: Evidence from Year of Assessment 2024
Authors
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch (Malaysia)
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor Branch (Malaysia)
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch (Malaysia)
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch (Malaysia)
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch (Malaysia)
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor Branch (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300317
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 4225-4235
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-14
Accepted: 2026-03-19
Published: 2026-04-06
Abstract
Tax reliefs and rebates are designed to reduce taxpayers’ financial burden by lowering chargeable income and tax payable. However, increasing living costs, inflationary pressures, and rising household expenses have raised concerns regarding the adequacy and relevance of existing relief provisions. Therefore, this study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of personal tax reliefs and rebates under the Malaysian Income Tax Act 1967 in reducing the financial burden of individual taxpayers for the Year of Assessment (YA) 2024.The data collection and discussion combined statutory analysis with survey-based evidence via a digital questionnaire. The population was Malaysian resident taxpayers and samples were chosen by means of random sampling. A total of 92 valid responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis to identify taxpayers’ perceptions regarding the relevance and adequacy of existing tax reliefs. Main findings showed that reliefs and rebates for the year assessment of 2024 were able to reduce financial burden but only to some extent. However, single taxpayers benefited less from the statutory provisions as compared to the married couples with children and parents. Several suggestions were obtained including to relax and revise the statutory provisions. The amount of reliefs and rebates were also should be increased to match the increase in cost of living. Additionally, new types of reliefs and rebates as per neighbouring countries are welcomed.
Keywords
Tax reliefs and rebates, financial burden, Malaysian taxpayers
Downloads
References
1. Barrios, S., Coda Moscarola, F., Figari, F., & Gandullia, L. (2020). Size and distributional pattern of pension-related tax expenditures in European countries. International Tax and Public Finance, 27(5), 1287–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-019-09580-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bird, R. M., & Zolt, E. M. (2019). Tax policy in developing countries: Looking back—and forward. National Tax Journal, 72(4), 755–772. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2019.4.05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Income Tax Act 1967 (Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Keen, M., & Slemrod, J. (2021). Rebellion, retribution, and reform: The politics and economics of taxation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(4), 173–200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Lee, H. A., & Khalid, M. A. (2022). Malaysia’s cost of living crisis: Socioeconomic implications for households. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 59(1), 23–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Mani Ras, T., Abdul Wahab, N., Abdullah, M., Abdul Rashid, S. F., & Abu Hassan, N. S. (2024). Economic constraint and self-tax relief: Effects on tax compliance and tax evasion. Jurnal Pengurusan, 72, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2024-72-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Mansor, M., Sabri, M. F., Mansur, M., & Ithnin, M. (2022). Predictors of financial stress and financial well-being among B40 households in Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12490. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ohno, T., Imahori, T., & Kojima, D. (2025). Effects of income-increasing deductions on household burden reduction. Japan and the World Economy, 73, 101296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Papanikolaou, N. (2021). Tax progressivity and income inequality. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Ragayah, M. Z. (2021). Reassessing household financial vulnerability in Malaysia. Institutions and Economies, 13(3), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Roslan, P. A. S., & Samsudin, H. (2024). Factors contributing to rising cost of living for M40 in Malaysia. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 20(3), 121–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Zhan, X., Liang, L., & Yu, M. (2025). Tax incentives and household consumption: Evidence from PIT reform. Finance Research Letters, 77, 107142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar