Generative AI in the Workplace: A Systematic Review of Productivity Effects, Employment Perceptions, and Job Insecurity

The growing adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in workplace settings has generated significant interest in its implications for productivity, employee perceptions, and job security. This systematic literature review synthesises findings from 40 empirical and conceptual studies published between 2020 and 2025 across organisational and professional contexts to evaluate the multifaceted impact of generative AI on organisational and workforce outcomes. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, a structured search was conducted across Google Scholar and Dimensions.ai, yielding 3,252 database records, with 8 additional hand-searched studies, of which 40 met the inclusion criteria. The review identifies consistent evidence of productivity improvements driven by task automation, decision support, and knowledge augmentation. However, these gains are accompanied by mixed employee perceptions, with increased efficiency and job satisfaction coexisting alongside concerns about skill obsolescence and role displacement. Job insecurity emerges as a critical mediating factor influencing employee attitudes and behavioral responses, including upskilling intentions and resistance to technological change. Importantly, the review reveals a significant research gap in the comparative understanding of generative AI's impact across developed and developing economies, where differences in technological infrastructure, labor market dynamics, and skill distributions may lead to uneven outcomes. The findings highlight that the effects of generative AI are heterogeneous and context-dependent, shaped by job roles, skill levels, and institutional environments. By integrating fragmented literature into a cohesive framework, this study contributes to the emerging discourse on AI-driven workplace transformation and offers implications for managers and policymakers to ensure more balanced, inclusive, and context-sensitive AI adoption strategies.

generative artificial intelligence, workplace productivity, job insecurity, employee perception, large language models, workforce transformation, systematic review.

1. Aderibigbe, A. O., Ohenhen, P. E., & Nwaobia, N. K. (2023). Artificial intelligence in developing countries: Bridging the gap between potential and implementation. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v4i3.629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adiasto, K. (2024). Sustainable employability in the age of generative artificial intelligence.Sustainability, 16(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al Naqbi, H., Bahroun, Z., & Ahmed, V. (2024). Enhancing work productivity through generative artificial intelligence: A comprehensive literature review. Sustainability, 16(3), 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Albaroudi, E., Mansouri, T., & Hatamleh, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of software engineering in Saudi Arabia: Governance, innovation, and workforce transformation. IEEE Access, 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Autor, D. (2022). The labor market impacts of technological change. NBER Working Paper No.30659. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w30659 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. BCG. (2025). AI at work 2025: Momentum builds, but gaps remain. Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2025/ai-at-work-momentum-builds-but-gaps-remain [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bick, A., Blandin, A., & Deming, D. (2024). The rapid adoption of generative AI. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025). Generative AI at work. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaf008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Davenport, T. H., & Mittal, N. (2022). How generative AI is changing creative work. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/07/how-generative-ai-is-changing-creative-work [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Deckker, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence and the future of job security: A narrative review of risks, resilience, and policy responses. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dell'Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., & Lakhani, K. R. (2023). Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 24-013. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4573321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Bhatt, A., Wright, R., Giannakis, M., & Williams, M. D. (2023). "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2024). GPTs are GPTs: An early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models. Science, 384(6702). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp6012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ersanlı, C. Y., Çelik, F., Barjesteh, H., & Duran, V. (2024). A review of global reskilling and upskilling initiatives in the age of AI. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Gabas, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence in Brazil: Impacts on economic growth, productivity, and inequality. Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society. https://ojs.stanford.edu/ojs/index.php/intersect/article/view/3836 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Godoy, M. B. K. (2024). AI impact on sales skills: The implications of artificial intelligence on the required skill set for the B2B sales workforce. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 44(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance.MIS Quarterly, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/249689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Isotalo, A. (2024). Increasing productivity with AI-powered knowledge work automation: Case M-Files. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Joshi, S. (2024). The transformative impact of artificial intelligence on US labor markets: Workforce disruption, skill evolution, and the emergence of prompt engineering. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kanwar, M. (2024). AI, economic growth, and the future of work: A country-specific analysis.World Development, 178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kulshreshtha, M. (2024). Effect of artificial intelligence on Gen Z and employment. Journal of Youth Studies, 27(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lazaroiu, G., & Rogalska, E. (2024). How generative artificial intelligence technologies shape partial job displacement and labor productivity growth. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 19(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Li, J., Cao, H., Lin, L., Hou, Y., Zhu, R., & El Ali, A. (2024). User experience design professionals' perceptions of generative artificial intelligence. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Liang, Y., Yang, M., & Wu, T. J. (2024). Double-edged sword effect of employee–AI collaboration: The role of AI uncertainty and digital leadership. Information & Management, 61(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lnenicka, M., & Machova, R. (2024). A mixed-methods analysis of artificial intelligence adoption and perceived impacts in Czech municipal administration. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nguyen, S., Lee, B., & Jung, H. (2024). Integrating generative AI for creativity in business processes: A qualitative analysis. Business Horizons, 67(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Oghene, P. K. (2024). The role of job satisfaction in employee retention in the world of artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Patel, R., Peko, G., & Sundaram, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the workplace: A paradox— contributor to loneliness and enhancer of organisational and employee health. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Peng, S., Kalliamvakou, E., Canny, J., & Tolar, M. (2023). The impact of AI on developer productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilot. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06590. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.06590.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Popescu, V. (2024). Artificial intelligence-driven workplace automation and algorithmic management tools for employee motivation, satisfaction, and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 41(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Puri, S., & Pandey, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence-driven sales-force optimisation: Enhancing productivity, forecasting and customer engagement. Journal of Business Research, 174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0496 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Remund, M., & Bernays, F. (2024). Beyond productivity: Emotional preferences in the decision to use generative artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Samokhina, O. (2024). Technological optimism or automation anxiety? Mapping discourses on data scientists' job displacement by AI. New Media & Society, 26(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Santandreu Calonge, D., & Kamalov, F. (2024). Upskilling and reskilling in the United Arab Emirates: Future-proofing careers with AI skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 19(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Sarfo, J. O., Tachie-Donkor, G., & Aggrey, E. K. (2024). Attitudes, perceptions, and challenges towards artificial intelligence adoption in Ghana and Nigeria: A systematic review with narrative synthesis. AI & Society, 39(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Strom, F. A. (2024). Is artificial intelligence really taking our jobs? Journal of Labor Economics, 42(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tenakwah, E. S., & Amankwaa, A. (2024). The artificial intelligence automation dilemma: Lessons from recent labour disputes in Australia. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 45(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Zhang, Q., Liao, G., Ran, X., & Wang, F. (2024). The impact of AI usage on innovation behavior at work: The moderating role of openness and job complexity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Zhao, H., & Wu, P. (2024). AI job substitution risks, digital self-efficacy and mental health among employees. Work, Employment and Society, 38(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Zhou, H., Wang, L., Cao, Y., & Li, J. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market: A study based on bibliometric analysis. Technology in Society, 76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]