Egypt’s Legal Framework to Enhance Mergers and Acquisitions in Jordan

This study conducts a systematic comparative legal analysis of the merger and acquisition governance frameworks in Jordan and Egypt. Recognizing that both countries share a civil law heritage and face similar challenges in economic development, the study posits that the more detailed and sophisticated Egyptian regulatory approach offers valuable lessons for Jordanian reform. The research employs a comparative legal methodology, comparing the key pillars of the two systems: company laws, securities regulations, acquisition laws, and judicial interpretations, particularly concerning the treatment of contracts and stakeholder rights post-merger. The analysis reveals that while both systems agree on fundamental principles such as the principle of succession, the Egyptian framework demonstrates greater development in areas such as mandatory offerings, minority shareholder protection, independent financial advice, and creditor engagement procedures. A marked divergence is observed in the treatment of post-merger leases, highlighting differing policy priorities. The findings suggest that the Jordanian legal framework, embodied in the Companies Law No. 22 of 1997, could be significantly improved by selectively incorporating Egyptian best practices. The article concludes by proposing a structured “legislation transfer” strategy for Jordan, recommending the adoption of mandatory tendering rules along the lines of the Egyptian model, improved disclosure regulations, and a more balanced approach to third-party contracts, while adapting these imports to the specific context of the Jordanian market. This research offers a practical and regionally informed roadmap for achieving and strengthening legal harmonization.

Comparative law, mergers and acquisitions, Jordan, Egypt, legislation transfer, shareholder protection, acquisition rules, legislative reform.

1. Al-Eisawi, R. (2018). Al-itar al-qanuni lil-indimaj wal-istihwal fi al-tashri' al-Urduni: dirasah muqaranah [The legal framework for merger and acquisition in Jordanian legislation: A comparative study]. Majallat al-Huquq wal-'Ulum al-Siyasiyah, 10(2), 55–77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-hukm raqm 284 li-sanat 1995 (Jordanian Court of Cassation 1995). Ahmad Al-Khuli, Al-Qanun al-Muqaran: Dirasah fi al-Nuzum al-Qanuniyah bayna al-Qanun al-Madani wal-Qanun al-‘Amm (Dar Al-Nahda Al-‘Arabiyah 2019). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-hukm raqm 944 li-sanat 1994 (Jordanian Court of Cassation 1994). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Khuli, A. (2019). Al-qanun al-muqaran: dirasah fi al-nuzum al-qanuniyah bayna al-qanun al-madani wal-qanun al-'amm [Comparative law: A study in legal systems between civil law and public law]. Dar Al-Nahda Al-'Arabiyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Sabbagh, M. (2019). Hukumat al-sharikat wa safaqat al-indimaj wal-istihwal: dirasah qanuniyah muqaranah [Corporate governance and merger and acquisition deals: A comparative legal study]. Dar Al-Nahda Al-'Arabiyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Al-ta’ammum raqm 2871 li-sanat 71 q (Egyptian Court of Cassation 2013). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Arab Republic of Egypt. (1981). Qanun al-sharikat al-musahamah wa sharikat al-tawsiyah bil-as'ham wal-sharikat that al-mas'uliyah al-mahdudah raqm 159 li-sanat 1981 [Law of Joint Stock Companies, Partnerships Limited by Shares, and Limited Liability Companies No. 159 of 1981]. Official Gazette. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Arab Republic of Egypt. (1992). Qanun suq ra's al-mal raqm 95 li-sanat 1992 [Capital Market Law No. 95 of 1992]. Official Gazette. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Awaisheh, S. M., Al-Dabbas, N. A., Alhasan, T. K., Odeibat, M., & Kurdi, A. A. (2024). The Dichotomy of Interests a Comparative Analysis of Civil and Administrative Lawsuits in the Jordanian Legal System. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 19(1), 135-151.‏ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Badran, A. (2013). Understanding the Egyptian regulatory state: Independent regulators in theory and practice. The Rise of the Regulatory State of the South: Infrastructure and Development in Emerging Economies, 53-74.‏ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Egyptian Fin. Regul. Auth., Al-Qawa’id al-Munazzimah li-‘Amaliyat al-Indimaj wal-Istihwal (Rules Regulating Merger and Acquisition Operations) (2022). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jordan Secs. Comm’n, Dalil Irshadat al-Indimaj wal-Istihwal lil-Sharikat al-Musahamah al-‘Ammah (Guide for Merger and Acquisition for Public Shareholding Companies) (2021). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jordanian Court of Cassation. (1994). Al-hukm raqm 944 li-sanat 1994 [Ruling No. 944 of 1994]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jordanian Court of Cassation. (1995). Al-hukm raqm 998 li-sanat 1995 [Ruling No. 998 of 1995]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kandriana, M., Sukardiawan, I. W., Rifaid, M., Arifin, Z., & Wildan, M. (2025). Inheritance Law in Egypt, Sudan, and Jordan: A Comparative Study of Systems and Implementation. Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum, 512-527.‏ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mathlouthi, N., Qozmar, N., Flayyih, N., Odeh, M., Alsabatin, H., & Aljahdali, H. (2024). Impact of international jurisdiction on the applicability of Jordanian civil law: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 19(1), 228-240.‏ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Muhammad Al-Sabbagh, Hukumat al-Sharikat wa Safaqat al-Indimaj wal-Istihwal: Dirasah Qanuniyah Muqaranah (Dar Al-Nahda Al-‘Arabiyah 2019).Fathi Abdul Khaliq, ‘Uqud al-Ijarah wa al-Ta’jir al-Tamwili fi Daw’ ‘Amaliyat al-Indimaj, 98 Majallat Niqabat al-Muhamin al-Misriyah 45 (2018). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Qanun al-sharikat al-musahamah wa sharikat al-tawsiyah bil-as'ham wal-sharikat that al-mas'uliyah al-mahdudah raqm 159 li-sanat 1981 (Joint Stock Companies, Partnerships Limited by Shares, and Limited Liability Companies Law No. 159 of 1981) (Egypt). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Qanun al-sharikat raqm (22) li-sanat 1997 (Companies Law No. 22 of 1997) (Jordan). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Qanun suq ra’ al-mal raqm 95 li-sanat 1992 (Capital Market Law No. 95 of 1992) (Egypt). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rafat Al-Eisawi, Al-Itar al-Qanuni lil-Indimaj wal-Istihwal fi al-Tashri’ al-Urduni: Dirasah Muqaranah, 10 Majallat al-Huquq wal-‘Ulum al-Siyasiyah 55 (2018). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.