Impacts and Recommendations of China's Overseas Port Investment in the Post-Pandemic Era
Authors
Normurodov Shukhrat Akmal Ugli
School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (China)
School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (China)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300343
Subject Category: Port Investment
Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 4625-4639
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-22
Accepted: 2026-03-27
Published: 2026-04-08
Abstract
The global economic and trade pattern has undergone in-depth adjustments in the post-pandemic era. Supply chain restructuring, intensified geopolitical games, and the transition toward green and low-carbon development have become the core variables affecting overseas port investment. Based on the current development status of China’s overseas port investment, this paper systematically analyzes the investment opportunities and risk challenges brought by the post-pandemic era. Combining typical cases and quantitative analysis models, it puts forward countermeasures and suggestions for optimizing investment layout, strengthening risk management and control, promoting technology empowerment, and deepening multilateral cooperation, providing theoretical references and practical paths for the high-quality development of China’s overseas port investment.
Keywords
Post-pandemic Era; Overseas Port Investment; Supply Chain Restructuring
Downloads
References
1. Blanchard J M F, Flint C. The geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative[J]. Geopolitics, 2017, 22(2): 223–245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Cheung M T, Hong Z. China’s “port-park-city” model: A case study of the Colombo Port City Project[J]. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2021, 62(4): 461–485. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Cullinane K, Wang Y. The efficiency of European container terminals: A cross-sectional data envelopment analysis[J]. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 2012, 15(3): 197–214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Du J, Zhang Y. Does One Belt One Road initiative promote Chinese overseas direct investment? [J]. China Economic Review, 2018, 47: 189–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Hurley J, Morris S, Portelance G. Examining the debt implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a policy perspective[R]. Center for Global Development Policy Paper, 2018, No.121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Jia Peng, Duan Jingming, Zhao Xueting, et al. Research on the Locational Choice of Port Investment along the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road[J]. Navigation of China, 2022, 45(04): 70–77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Jones L, Zou Y. Rethinking the role of state-owned enterprises in China’s rise[J]. New Political Economy, 2017, 22(6): 743–760. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Lee P T-W, Hu Z H, Lee S J, et al. Research trends and agenda on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): A systematic review of the literature[J]. Transport Policy, 2018, 68: 70–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Li Y, Bolton K, Westphal T. The role of port infrastructure and logistics in the development of the Belt and Road Initiative[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2020, 47(7): 899–916. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Liang Yuanshan, Zhou Fangyin. The Securitization Process of Chinese Enterprises’ Overseas Port Investments by US Allies: Case Studies of Investments in Hamburg Port and Darwin Port[J]. Journal of International Relations, 2025, (01): 77–99+157–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Luo Danli. Current Status, Risks, and Countermeasures of Overseas Port Investment by Chinese Enterprises[J]. Containerization, 2025, 36(06): 1–3+14. DOI: 10.13340/j.cont.2025.06.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Notteboom T, Yang D, Xu H. The impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on the routing of container flows in the global shipping network[J]. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2020, 22(2): 142–166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Peng Nian. Risk Analysis and Policy Recommendations for China’s Overseas Port Investments under the Belt and Road Initiative[J]. South Asian Studies, 2019, (03): 106–122+154–155. DOI: 10.16608/j.cnki.nyyj.2019.03.04. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Rehman Z U, Noman A A. Security perceptions and the securitization of Chinese infrastructure investments: The case of Gwadar Port[J]. Asian Politics & Policy, 2020, 12(1): 85–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Rodrigue J P, Notteboom T. Foreland-based regionalization: Integrating intermediate hubs with port hinterlands[J]. Economic Geography, 2010, 86(2): 205–230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Shao Yanbo, Wu Xinqi, Lyu Tingting. The “Belt and Road” Initiative and the Debt Trap Theory: Evidence from Countries Receiving China’s Overseas Port Investments[J/OL]. Marine Economy, 1–12[2025-12-26]. https://doi.org/10.19426/j.cnki.cn12-1424/p.20251223.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Shao Yanbo, Yu Jingwei. Research on the Risk Assessment of China’s Port Investments in Countries along the Belt and Road[J]. Journal of Chaohu University, 2022, 24(05): 56–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Shang Ming. Building a Multi-Layered Overseas Investment Rights Protection System for Central State-Owned Enterprises[J]. Economic Herald, 2025, (10): 10–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Sun Jiaqing, Han Xinghua, Ma Yuechao, et al. Risk Assessment of Port Investment in Countries along the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2021, 47(02): 115–125. DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2021.02.013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Xie Wenqing. The “Major Shift” in China’s Overseas Port Investment under the Belt and Road Initiative[J]. China Shipping Gazette, 2022, (23): 29–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Ye M. The Belt and Road and Beyond: State-Mobilized Globalization in China (1998–2018)[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Yu J, Tang H, Yang Z, et al. Risk assessment of overseas port investments under the Belt and Road Initiative: A systemic framework[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2021, 211: 105773. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Zhang Sheng, Wang Liehui, Tang Zhaopei, et al. Vitality Evaluation of China-Invested Ports along the Belt and Road[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2025, 80(08): 2200–2218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. American Enterprise Institute, Heritage Foundation. China Global Investment Tracker[EB/OL]. https://www.aei.org/china-global-investment-tracker/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Center for Global Development. Belt and Road Initiative Research & Policy Papers[EB/OL]. https://www.cgdev.org/topics/belt-and-road-initiative [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. China Ports & Harbors Association. Statistics and Reports on Chinese and Overseas Ports[EB/OL]. http://www.port.org.cn/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. International Transport Forum (OECD). Infrastructure, Connectivity and Belt and Road Studies[EB/OL]. https://www.itf-oecd.org/infrastructure [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. UNCTAD. World Investment Report & Infrastructure Investment Data[EB/OL]. https://unctad.org/topic/investment/world-investment-report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. World Bank. Belt and Road Economics & Transport Corridor Studies[EB/OL]. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/brief/belt-and-road-initiative [Google Scholar] [Crossref]