Assessing Children’s Acquisition of Basic Numeracy Skills Using the Early Grade Mathematics Assessment (EGMA)

The present study used the EGMA toolkit to evaluate the numeracy skills of Grade II students enrolled in “Assamese medium” government schools in Kamrup Metropolitan of Assam. A descriptive survey design was used and a sample of 50 students was obtained via purposive and simple random sampling techniques. The modified form of the adapted Early Grade Math Assessment (EGMA), created using the state curriculum and translated into Assamese had been piloted and had acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.768). The analysis of the data indicated that the students showed good ability in the number identification task, 93.60%, and in the number discrimination task, 92.20%. While Addition Level 1 (87.50%), Subtraction Level 1 (79.10%) and Word Problems (79.33%) were moderate, Missing Number (69.40%), Addition Level 2 (59.60%) and Subtraction Level 2 (55.60%) were difficult. Mental calculation was the most used strategy for all problem types, while paper-pencil method was the second and physical ways were the least preferred. This suggests that at least some children who struggle with complex numeracy tasks may not do so only because they lack certain knowledge or skills, but rather because they struggle to employ particular strategies in order to achieve a particular conceptual understanding.

Numeracy skills, Early Grade Mathematics Assessment, Grade 2 students, Mathematics

1. Gersten, R., & Chard, D. J. (1999). Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699903300102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2007). The role of education quality for economic growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (4122). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Purpura, D. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2012). Informal numeracy skills: The structure and relations among numbering, counting, and basic arithmetic abilities in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(3), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Global Partnership for Education. (2014). Learning outcomes in early grades: Conceptual framework and implications for policy and practice. Retrieved from https://www.globalpartnership.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Perry, M. (2016). Early Grade Mathematics Assessment (EGMA) Toolkit (Revised Edition). RTI International [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Platas, L. M., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., & Sitabkhan, Y. (2016). Using an assessment of early mathematical knowledge and skills to inform policy and practice: Examples from the early grade mathematics assessment. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.20881 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Perry, L., Platas, L. M., & Sitbakhan, Y. (2018). Aligning test scoring procedures with test uses of the early grade mathematics assessment: A balancing act. Global Education Review, 5(3), 143–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Australian Council for Educational Research. (2020). The early grade mathematics assessment: Assessing children’s acquisition of basic numeracy skills in developing countries (Assessment GEM Series No. 16). https://www.acer.org/au/gem [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Moloi, Q., & Roberts, N. (2021). A validation process towards the modification of the Grade 1 Early Grade Mathematics Assessment. In Z. Jojo & M. Du Plooy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual National Congress of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa, 14th–16th July 2021, Muckleneuk Campus, University of South Africa: Pretoria (pp. 502–512). University of South Africa. https://isbnsearch.org/isbn/9780620947794 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. U.S. Department of Education. (2008). The importance of early math. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. RTI International. (2011). Early Grade Mathematics Assessment Toolkit: Technical Report. Research Triangle Institute International [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2012). Global education digest 2012: Comparing education statistics across the world. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. RTI International. (2013). Early Grade Mathematics Assessment (EGMA) Toolkit. USAID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. RTI International. (2014a). Early Grade Mathematics Assessment (EGMA) Toolkit: User Guide. USAID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. RTI International. (2014c). Early Grade Mathematics Assessment (EGMA): Core EGMA Technical Report. USAID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]