Is there a Relationship between Reading Difficulties and Reading Strategies?

Authors

Ahmad Asnawi Bin Zamri

Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Muhammad Hafidzudeen bin Norazizan

Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Mohamed Hafizuddin bin Mohamed Jamrus

Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Ainaa Izzaty Binti Zamri

Project Home Safety and Claims, TDCX (MY) Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

Noor Hanim Rahmat

Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.924ILEIID0035

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/24 | Page No: 325-334

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-23

Accepted: 2025-09-30

Published: 2025-10-30

Abstract

Reading proficiency remains essential for undergraduates, yet many face challenges that affect comprehension and academic performance, especially in today’s digital age. This quantitative study examined perceived reading difficulties, reading strategies, and their relationship among 119 undergraduates at a public Malaysian university. Using a survey adapted from Abeeleh & Al-Sobh (2021) and Amer et al. (2010), results showed self-perception issues such as believing peers are better at language and anxiety despite preparation were the most reported difficulties, followed by vocabulary barriers. Problem-solving strategies were the most frequently used, global strategies were rated moderately high, and support strategies were rated the least. Findings support Flavell’s Metacognitive Theory, suggesting that greater difficulties prompt more strategic responses. Pedagogical implications include targeted vocabulary support, confidence-building, and balanced training in global, problem-solving, and support strategies to develop strategic, independent readers.

Keywords

reading difficulties, reading strategies

Downloads

References

1. Abdullah, N. S., & Ismail, H. H. (2025). Click, Think, Read: Investigating the Use of Metacognitive Online Reading Strategies among Malaysian ESL Students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(II), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.9020026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abeeleh,T.W.A. and Al-Sobh,M. (2021) Reading Comprehension Problems Encountered by EFL Students at Aljoun National University. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, Vol 8(1), pp6-15. Retrieved from https://ijllnet.com/journals/Vol_8_No_1_March_2021/2.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying Differences Between Reading Skills and Reading Strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ali, Akbar & Gul, Nasim & Syed, Sabih-Ul-Hassan. (2022). An Investigation into the Reading Comprehension Problems Faced by the Pakistani Students at University Level. 5. 134-148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Amer,A., AL Barwani,T., Ibrahim, M. (2010) Student Teachers’ Perceived Use of Online Reading Strategies. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), Vol 6(4), pp 102-113. Retrieved from httpe://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Aziz, A. a. A., Nordin, N. A., Yatim, A. I. A., Shaidin, S., Saad, N. H. M., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). A Study of The Relationship between Metacognitive Reading Strategies among Undergraduates. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i6/17044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL university students across gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421-437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Grabe, W.P., & Stoller, F.L. (2011). Teaching and Researching: Reading (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833743 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jackson,S.L. (2015) Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5tH Edition) Boston, USA: Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Le, H. V., Nguyen, T. A. D., Le, D. H. N., Nguyen, P. U., & Nguyen, T. T. A. (2024). Unveiling critical reading strategies and challenges: a mixed-methods study among English major students in a Vietnamese higher education institution. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2326732 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rahmat,N.H., Arepin,M., & Sulaiman,S. (2020) The Cycle of Academic Reading Fear among Undergraduates. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 16(3), 265-274. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1274130.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rahman, S. A. S. A., Yunos, D. R. M., Whancit, W., Rahmat, N. H., & Ngadiran, N. M. (2023). Perceived Difficulties and Use of Online Reading Strategies: A Study among Undergraduates. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(7), 997 – 1013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Raja Yacob, R. N. H., & Mohamad, M. M. (2023). Investigating the metacognitive online reading strategies among ESL undergraduates. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(11), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i11/19245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Singh, K. K. M., Chu, I. L. Y., Bee, A. A. M., Lourdunathan, J., Keat, Y. C., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). The Relationship between Reading Difficulties and Reading Strategies among ESL Learners in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(5), 2256–2277. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Syatriana, E., Tohirovna, A. L., & Ariana, A. (2024). University students’ metacognitive knowledge on reading technique and academic success. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi – USBED 6(10), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10692127, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/usbed [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles