Responsible Leadership, Digital Transformation Capability, and Sustainability Performance in Business and Higher Education Institutions

This study examined the influence of responsible leadership and digital transformation capability on sustainability performance in business organizations and higher education institutions. Specifically, it determined the levels of responsible leadership, digital transformation capability, and sustainability performance; tested the significant relationships among these variables; examined the mediating role of digital transformation capability; and identified whether significant differences existed when institutions were grouped according to sector. Using a quantitative, explanatory-correlational, cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 400 respondents, composed of 200 participants from business organizations and 200 participants from higher education institutions. The data were analyzed using weighted mean, standard deviation, Pearson product–moment correlation, independent samples t-test, and structural equation modeling for mediation analysis. The findings revealed that responsible leadership, digital transformation capability, and sustainability performance were all manifested at a high level.

The results further showed that responsible leadership had a significant positive relationship with digital transformation capability and sustainability performance, while digital transformation capability was also significantly and positively related to sustainability performance. Mediation analysis confirmed that digital transformation capability partially mediated the relationship between responsible leadership and sustainability performance. Comparative analysis revealed no significant sectoral difference in responsible leadership and sustainability performance, but a significant difference was found in digital transformation capability, with business organizations demonstrating relatively stronger digital readiness than higher education institutions. The study concludes that responsible leadership serves as a foundational organizational driver, while digital transformation capability functions as an enabling mechanism that strengthens sustainability performance across both sectors. The findings provide empirical support for an integrated framework linking leadership, digital capability, and sustainable institutional outcomes.

responsible leadership, digital transformation capability, sustainability performance, business organizations, higher education institutions, cross-sector study

1. Abbas, A., Saud, M., Suhariadi, F., Usman, I., & Ekowati, D. (2022). Role of responsible leadership for organizational citizenship behavior for the environment in light of psychological ownership and employee environmental commitment: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 756570. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756570 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Betito, A. D. R. (2026). Leadership styles and total quality management integration: A cross-sector analysis of operational excellence in business and academic insitutions. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 13(1), 1779–1789.https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2026.13010156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Carmo, J. E. S., Lacerda, D. P., Klingenberg, C. O., & Piran, F. A. S. (2025). Digital transformation in the management of higher education institutions. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Connolly, C., O’Brien, E., & O’Ceallaigh, T. J. (2023). Ensuring knowledge sustainability in a digital era: Empowering digital transformation through digital educational leadership. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09707-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. de Klerk, J. J., & Jooste, M. (2023). Responsible leadership and its place in the leadership domain: A meaning-based systematic review. Business and Society Review, 128(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dong, W., Liao, Z., Yang, Y., & Zhong, L. (2021). Responsible leadership fuels innovative behavior: The mediating roles of socially responsible human resource management and organizational pride. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 787833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787833 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hariyani, D., Hariyani, P., & Mishra, S. (2025). The role of leadership in sustainable digital transformation of the organization. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101130 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Heim, I., Laker, B., & Tabaeifard, S. J. (2026). Responsible leadership: A systematic literature review, theoretical framework, and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 203, 115801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115801 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Huo, C., Safdar, M. A., & Ahmed, M. (2024). Impact of responsible leadership on sustainable performance: A moderated mediation model. Kybernetes, 53(12), 5263–5284. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2023-0342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Laufer, M., Deacon, B., Mende, M. A., & Schäfer, L. O. (2025). Leading with trust: How university leaders can foster innovation with educational technology through organizational trust. Innovative Higher Education, 50(1), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09733-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Liang, Y., Koo, J.-M., & Lee, M.-J. (2024). The interplay of environmental dynamism, digitalization capability, green entrepreneurial orientation, and sustainable performance. Sustainability, 16(17), 7674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Liu, R., Yue, Z., Ijaz, A., Lutfi, A., & Mao, J. (2023). Sustainable business performance: Examining the role of green HRM practices, green innovation and responsible leadership through the lens of pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability, 15(9), 7317. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. McCarthy, P., Sammon, D., & Alhassan, I. (2024). The characteristics of digital transformation leadership: Theorizing the practitioner voice. Business Horizons, 67(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.03.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mutambik, I. (2024). Digital transformation as a driver of sustainability performance—A study from freight and logistics industry. Sustainability, 16(10), 4310.https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Okanović, A., Ješić, J., Đaković, V., Vukadinović, S., & Andrejević Panić, A. (2021). Increasing university competitiveness through assessment of green content in curriculum and eco-labeling in higher education. Sustainability, 13(2), 712. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020712 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Olszak, C. M., & Sączewska-Piotrowska, A. (2025). The role of higher education institutions in shaping sustainability and digital ethics in the era of Industry 5.0: Universities as incubators of future skills. Sustainability, 17(19), 8530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198530 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sacavém, A., Martínez-Costa, C., & Breda, Z. (2025). Leading in the digital age: The role of leadership in organizational digital transformation. Administrative Sciences, 15(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15020043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Schiuma, G., Santarsiero, F., Carlucci, D., & Jarrar, Y. (2024). Transformative leadership competencies for organizational digital transformation. Business Horizons, 67(4), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.04.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tsui, A. S. (2021). Responsible research and responsible leadership studies. Academy of Management Discoveries, 7(2), 166–170. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zhukabayeva, T., Baumuratova, D., Zholshiyeva, L., Karabay, A., & Abdrakhmanov, K. (2025). Digital transformation in higher education: Toward a national model of digital university in Kazakhstan through global and local comparison. Sustainability, 17(24), 11132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Navigating the Adverse Strategies in Managing Hostile, Resistant and Disruptive Community Project Stakeholders in Nairobi County, Kenya.
• Why Management Control Systems Fail or Succeed: A Legitimacy-Based Process Explanation of Financial Performance