Key Drivers of a Multipurpose Cooperative Membership Attraction

Cooperatives have become part of how communities grow. However, a significant number of eligible employees remain non-members. This descriptive-correlational study addressed the gap by examining the factors that make membership in an institutionalized closed-type cooperative in Cagayan de Oro City attractive to employees. The main problem addressed was whether economic, social, and organizational factors influence employees’ decision to join and stay in the cooperative. A validated survey questionnaire was tested for reliability using confirmatory factor analysis. It was administered to one-hundred thirty-two (132) participants in a government agency. Results showed that organizational and economic factors play the biggest role in shaping membership attractiveness. Participants rated highly transparency in fund use, responsiveness to member concerns, and efficiency in service delivery. Economic programs including emergency loans, savings schemes, and dividends were seen as important benefits. In contrast, social factors such as camaraderie and participation in activities received moderate ratings, suggesting that they are expected. Regression analysis confirmed that organizational and economic factors significantly influence membership attractiveness, while social factors do not significantly influence. This means improving governance, service systems, and financial programs are the most effective ways to attract and retain members. Based on the findings, it is recommended for the cooperative to strengthen governance transparency and expand financial services. Moreover, there is a need for social activities to be improved to foster inclusivity and stronger sense of community. For future researchers, it is recommended to examine additional factors that could influence membership attractiveness. Additionally, to conduct longitudinal studies and use mixed-method approaches with advanced tools to track changes in membership attractiveness.

Cooperative Membership Attractiveness, Organizational Factors, Economic Factors, Social Factors

1. Abella, F. S., & Bation, N. D. (2024). Analysis of the factors affecting business sustainability of agricultural cooperatives in Northern Mindanao. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(3), 1765–1776. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i03-35 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., & Khan, M. M. (2022). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1015921. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beriales, M. R. P. (2022). Member engagement and level of satisfaction in a revitalized co-operative enterprise in Iloilo Province, Philippines. Journal of Economics, Management & Agricultural Development, 8(1), 45–60. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:pjemad:342301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Borige, V. K., & Shailaja, N. (2024). Social exchange theory: Exploring reciprocity, equity, and relationship management in diverse contexts. International Journal of Fundamental and Multidisciplinary Research, 12(2), 45–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chan, A., & Raharja, S. J. (2023). Impact of cooperative perceived value on customer satisfaction and loyalty. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 13(1), 158–172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://buscompress.com/uploads/3/4/9/8/34980536/riber_13-1_12_k22-046_158-172.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hilario, V. (2022). Socio-economic impact of cooperatives among members: An input to customized program development framework for cooperatives. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(6), 1–12. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=20423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Khumalo, S., Mkwanazi, S., & Madonsela, N. (2025). The mediating role of governance in the application of cooperative principles amongst agricultural cooperatives. African Journal of Cooperative Development, 11(1), 22–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Malabarbas, G. T., Labro, R., Francisco, E., Gallo, N., Bomitivo, J. L., & Vista, E. (2022). Impact and satisfaction level among members of people’s cooperative. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 7(3), 41–51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. https://www.ejournal.aibpmjournals.com/index.php/IJABIM?article/download/1379/1832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4288(91)90011-Z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ribas, W. P., Pedroso, B., Vargas, L. M., Picinin, C. T., & de Freitas Júnior, M. A. (2022). Cooperative organization and its characteristics in economic and social development (1995 to 2020). Sustainability, 14(14), 8470. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8470 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zeng, L., & Wan, J. (2024). Substitution or complement: How do contractual and relational governance shape members’ organizational commitment to farmer cooperatives? Journal of Rural Organizational Studies, 19(2), 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• IFRS S1 and S2: A Global and Indian Perspective with Implications for Auditors
• A Study on Consumer Attitudes and Buying Behavior towards organic Food Products
• India’s Transfer Pricing Framework: Evolution, Challenges, and Future Directions
• Application of Statistical Methods in Business Administration: A Quantitative Study on Organizational Performance
• Decoding Fintech Adoption: The Role of Trust, Risks and Perceived Benefits