Investigating the Influence of Value in Learners’ Motivation to Learn

Authors

Ahmad bin Wan Abd Rahman

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, University Technology MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Mohamad Nor Amin bin Samsun Baharun

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, University Technology MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Abdul Azim Mohamad Isa

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, University Technology MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Fahed Maromar

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, University Technology MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Abderrahmane Hibaoui

Dar el- Hadith El Hassania Instituition, Al Quaraouiyine University (Morocco)

Noor Hanim Rahmat

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, University Technology MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.924ILEIID0043

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/24 | Page No: 414-425

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-23

Accepted: 2025-09-30

Published: 2025-10-30

Abstract

Motivation among the learners is one of the most critical issues when it comes to engagement in academic activities, perseverance and performance. Based on the ERG Theory by Alderfer, the paper will examine the relationship between three essential motivational dimensions, which include value, expectancy, and affective dimensions against the background of Malaysian undergraduate language learners. The quantitative research design was adopted and a structured questionnaire was administered to 220 undergraduates. Results have shown that the value element of learning motivation serves as a primary driver of learning motivation, which has a strong influence on expectancy beliefs as well as on affective experiences. Extrinsic goal orientation, positive task-value beliefs, and moderate intrinsic orientation were high, moderate, and high respectively. The measures pertaining to expectations were also high in self-efficacy and moderate in affective measures displayed moderate levels of test anxiety. The results confirm previous findings that value, persistence, and emotional involvement are related and the applicability of ERG Theory in educational motivation studies. The implications emphasize the need to ensure that learning environments are designed to add value to tasks, build self-efficacy and resolve affective learning barriers.

Keywords

Learning motivation, ERG Theory, value, expectancy

Downloads

References

1. Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(2), 142–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90004-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Dhamit, Y., & Kreishan, L. (2013). Gifted students' intrinsic and extrinsic motivations and parental influence on their motivation: From the self‐determination theory perspective. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ceylan, N. (2024). The contribution of motivational beliefs to motivational and affective strategy use. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4470447/v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Deci, E., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Diarta, L., & Saluy, A. (2022). The role of competence, psychological capital, and intrinsic motivation interventions in influencing teacher performance in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Law Policy and Governance, 1(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.54099/ijlpg.v1i2.396 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dong, L., Liu, M., & Yang, F. (2022). The relationship between foreign language classroom anxiety, enjoyment, and expectancy-value motivation and their predictive effects on Chinese high school students’ self-rated foreign language proficiency. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 860603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.860603 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Feldman, D. C., & Arnold, H. J. (1978). Position choice: Comparing the importance of organizational and job factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(6), 706–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.6.706 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fischer, C., Malycha, C., & Schafmann, E. (2019). The influence of intrinsic motivation and synergistic extrinsic motivators on creativity and innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Graen, G. B., Scandura, T. A., & Graen, M. R. (1986). A field experimental test of the moderating effects of growth need strength on productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 484–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.484 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hamdan-Mansour, A. M., Hamaideh, S. H., Azzeghaiby, S. N., Hanouneh, S. I., & Aboshaiqah, A. E. (2015). Psychosocial correlates of motivation for academic accomplishment among university students. Open Journal of Medical Psychology, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmp.2015.41001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach (5th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jha, S. (2010). Need satisfaction, motivation and job satisfaction of university teachers: A case of Nepal. International Bulletin of Business Administration, 9, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kim, C., & Pekrun, R. (2022). Emotions and motivation in learning and performance. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 9, pp. 117–153). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2021.12.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kusurkar, R. A., Cate, O. T. J., Vos, C. M. P., Westers, P., & Croiset, G. (2012). How motivation affects academic performance: A structural equation modelling analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rahmat, N. H., & Thasrabiab, T. (2024). Exploring motivation and self-regulation from the social cognitive view. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 14(10), 3276–3290. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i1/20476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tze, V. M. C., Daniels, L. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2022). Evaluating the control-value theory of achievement emotions in the classroom: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09627-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wanous, J. P., & Zwany, A. (1977). A cross-section test of need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(77)90052-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wouters, A., Croiset, G., Galindo‐Garre, F., & Kusurkar, R. (2016). Motivation of medical students: Selection by motivation or motivation by selection. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0560-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zargar, M., Vandenberghe, C., Marchand, C., & Ayed, A. (2013). Job scope, affective commitment, and turnover: The moderating role of growth need strength. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(2), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles