Bilateral Tubal Ligation in Southeast Nigeria: Indications and Uptake Trends Over Five Years

Background: Bilateral tubal ligation (BTL) is a highly effective and permanent method of contraception with a failure rate of less than 1%. Despite its safety and effectiveness, uptake remains low in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa, including Nigeria. This study assessed the uptake, indications, and clinical characteristics of BTL in a tertiary health institution in Southeast Nigeria.
Methods: This was a five-year retrospective descriptive study conducted at Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), Enugu, Nigeria. Records of all women who underwent BTL during the study period were reviewed. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, type of procedure, associated surgical interventions, indications; previous awareness and uptake of contraception, and complications were extracted and analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Bilateral tubal ligation, permanent contraception, uptake, obstetric indications

1. Peterson HB, et al. Sterilization. Contraception. 2008;78(2):109-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO; 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Contraceptive Use 2022. New York: UN; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Olakunde BO, et al. Uptake of permanent contraception among women in sub-Saharan Africa: barriers and facilitators. Contraception. 2019; 99(4):205-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. National Population Commission (Nigeria), ICF. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Abuja; 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ozumba BC, Ibekwe PC. Contraceptive use at UNTH Enugu. Public Health. 2001;115(1):51-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bello OO, et al. Trends in contraceptive uptake at a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Int J Med Health Dev. 2020; 25(1):45-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Omo-Aghoja LO, et al. Trends in contraceptive practice in Nigerian tertiary centers. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014;17:1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Okafor II, et al. The disappearing practice of permanent contraception in Southeast Nigeria. 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Eyong EM, et al. Six-year review of BTL uptake in Calabar. Int J Health Sci. 2022;6(S3):1011-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ugoji DPC, et al. Uptake of BTL in Abakaliki. Int J Res Sci Innov. 2019;6(7):37-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nigerian Med J. Five-year review of BTL at RSUTH. 2023;64(1):139-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. TJOG. Contraceptive preferences in Uyo Teaching Hospital. 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. Acceptability of BTL in Sokoto. 2020;9:1234-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Biores Scientia. Acceptability of BTL in Ibadan. 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Pan Afr Med J. Willingness to use female permanent contraception in Nigeria. 2025;50:96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. PMC Study. Predictors of willingness to undergo BTL in Osogbo. 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. OlaOlorun FM, Hindin MJ. Partner influence on contraceptive use in Nigeria. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;40:10-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Igweagu CP, et al. Knowledge and practice of contraceptive use at ESUTH. BJSTR. 2024;54(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. NJGP. Barriers to family planning uptake in Enugu. 2024;21(2):59-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nigeria fertility and contraceptive prevalence review. 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Contraception Journal. Global patterns in female sterilization uptake. 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Danforth N, et al. Counseling and contraceptive method choice. Stud Fam Plann. 2019;50:1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ezechi OC, et al. Postpartum sterilization practices in Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2012; 19:123-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Adeyemi AS, et al. Determinants of contraceptive choice among Nigerian women. Afr J Reprod Health. 2016; 20:90-98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Edu EM, Edet EE, Asuquo OO, Sylvester AE. A six-year review of uptake of bilateral tubal ligation at a tertiary health institution in Calabar, Nigeria. Int J Health Sci. 2022;16(3):XX-XX. 26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wekere FC, Enyindah CE, Udofia EA. Female sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation) at the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital: A five-year review. Niger Med J. 2023;64(2):XX-XX. 27 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Akinola OI, Fabamwo AO, Ottun TA, et al. Acceptability of bilateral tubal ligation among women attending antenatal clinic in University College Hospital, Ibadan. Afr J Reprod Health. 2021;25(4):XX-XX.28 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Yakubu A, Sagir TD, Panti A, et al. Perception and acceptability of bilateral tubal ligation among women attending antenatal clinic in Sokoto, Nigeria. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(5):XX-XX. 29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kibet PJ, Okeyo JA. Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards utilization of bilateral tubal ligation in Kenya. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2024;13(2):XX-XX. 30 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Babayemi OO, Sam-Agudu NA, Patel TY, et al. Uptake of permanent contraception among women in sub-Saharan Africa: Barriers and facilitators. Contraception. 2019;100(2):XX- 31 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Development and Evaluation of Floating Alginate Beads of Esomeprazole
• Determination of pKa Value for Ranolazine and Atenolol Using UV Spectroscopy
• The Science of Sustained-Release Medications
• Development of Proteomics in Clinical Medicine
• Advances on Quinoline Derivatives: A Review of Synthesis and Biological Activities