Bridging the ESG Gap: Tailored Implementation Frameworks for Heterogeneous Firm Sizes and Sectors in Malaysia's Consumer Industry

Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) integration has assumed a strategic necessity to the entire corporation of the world, and the consumer product sector in Malaysia is at the crossroad. Though most of the research on the impact of ESG on firm performance has continued to increase, the findings are typically not consistent, hence offering a lot of confusion to corporate managers and shareholders. The formulation of the present situation of ESG research in Malaysia offered in this study recognizes three gaps in the existing body of knowledge. The first one is the impossibility to take into account the heterogeneity of the firms’ size and sector risk, the second issue is the specific implementation challenges of the Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), and the third problem is the unresolved trade-offs between the short-term cost of the financial investment in environmental projects and long-term value creation. To address these lapses, this paper proposes the Contingent ESG Implementation Framework (CEIF) a conceptual framework within which companies can employ in prioritizing ESG pillars based on their field of operation. The framework is further developed according to the analysis of 50 major studies as well as a mixed-methods research design is provided to validate it empirically. The CEIF indicates that a one-size-fits-all approach is not perfect; firms, particularly SME and operating in risky sectors need to adopt a progressive approach whereby, in most instances, governance and social considerations are prioritized before firms and corporations undertake capital-intensive environmental initiatives. This research adds value to stakeholder and resource-based theories by building a contingency strategy of ESG strategy and offering practical and evidence-based recommendations to managers, investors, and policymakers taking into account maximization of sustainable development and competitive advantage in the context of Malaysian dynamic consumer market.

Keywords

ESG Malaysia, Consumer Firms, SMEs, Corporate Strategy

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. Adenan, N. H., Shafie, S. A., & Sairuly, N. (2024). Navigating the sustainability landscape: ESG commitment and financial performance of Malaysian SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 31(2), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2023-0015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agu, I., Odoom, R., & Anning-Dorson, T. (2024). Sustainable practices, brand loyalty and competitive advantage: A literature review of the consumer perspective. Journal of Business Research, 165, Article 114651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114651 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmad, N., Nordin, N., & Mohammad, J. (2023). ESG controversies and firm performance: The moderating role of social and governance pillars in Malaysia. Pacific Accounting Review, 35(4), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-04-2022-0061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alam, M. S., Uddin, M., & Yazdifar, H. (2022). Corporate governance and ESG disclosure: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 12(5), 835–856. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-01-2022-0012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alyasa-Gan, C. K., Mohamad, A., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). The impact of ESG disclosure on initial public offering performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2023.100987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Atan, R., Mohamad, A., & Jaffar, R. (2018). The impact of corporate governance on ESG disclosures and firm value. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(3), 452–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-01-2018-0015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Burki, S., Jusoh, S., & Raza, H. (2024). ESG disclosure and firm performance in ASEAN markets: Evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Emerging Markets Review, 48, Article 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2023.101014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. E-Vahdati, S., Zainal, D., & Ali, M. (2023). CSR awards and ESG value relevance: A comparative study of Malaysia and Japan. Asian Review of Accounting, 31(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-10-2021-0321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hamoudah, A. (2025). Management accounting practices and ESG reporting quality: The role of institutional pressures. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 21(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-03-2023-0062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ibrahim, M., Ismail, M., & Ghani, E. (2024). Carbon footprint disclosure among Malaysian manufacturers: A content analysis. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(2), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2023-0034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jasni, N., & Zulkifli, S. (2024). Sector risk and the ESG-financial performance relationship: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 20(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-05-2023-0195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kamaludin, N., Sanusi, Z., & Bader, M. (2022). Board attributes and ESG disclosure quality in Malaysia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(8), 1901–1921. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2021-0538 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kurniawan, R. (2023). The impact of ESG scores on company performance: Evidence from Indonesia and Malaysia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33369/jaai.27.1.1-15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lee, C., Pettersson, T., & Svanberg, J. (2023). The impact of ESG disclosure on firm performance: Evidence from FTSE4Good index members. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 3456–3471. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mahdi, S., Ali, H., & Omar, W. (2024). The green economy framework and ESG integration: A bibliometric review and future agenda for Malaysia. Environmental Science & Policy, 149, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103464 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Manokaran, N., Othman, R., & Hussein, N. (2023). Corporate governance and CSR disclosure: The role of external auditors in Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 38(7), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2022-0280 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ming, L., Yee, C., & Zainal, D. (2024). ESG scores and financial performance: A GMM approach for Malaysian consumer firms. Applied Economics Letters, 31(15), 2185–2190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2023.2293736 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mohammad, J., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2021). ESG disclosure and firm performance: The moderating role of competitive advantage. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, Article 101575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101575 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mukhtar, M., Ismail, M., & Othman, R. (2023). ESG practices and green innovation: The moderating role of innovation orientation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, Article 135678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Murali, R., Pathak, R., & Rani, P. (2012). CSR and consumer loyalty: A case study in the Malaysian consumer market. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(3), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1475-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ratnasingam, J., Ma, C., & Lim, H. (2023). ESG awareness and adoption in the Malaysian wood and furniture industry. Journal of Forestry Research, 34(4), 987–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01519-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rosley, M., Aman, A., & Rahman, R. (2023). Governance disclosure and firm performance: Evidence from emerging markets. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 20(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDG-07-2022-0060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ruhaini, M., Ali, S., & Yusoff, H. (2025). ESG integration and market valuation: Evidence from Malaysian listed consumer firms. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 98, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2024.08.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Samidi, M., & Kwan, B. (2024). Firm characteristics and ESG ratings: The role of gender diversity in Malaysia. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 39(5), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-01-2023-0016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Shad, M., Nisar, A., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Green organizational culture, CSR, and green innovation: The moderating role of ESG disclosure. Journal of Business Research, 157, Article 113578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113578 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Shahrun, N., Nor, M., & Kassim, A. (2023). ESG scores and firm profitability: A panel data analysis of Malaysian PLCs. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 16(3), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-02-2022-0080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Tang, L. (2023). The evolution of ESG regulatory frameworks in Southeast Asia. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2085417 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wong, W. (2024). ESG practices and financial performance: A critical review of evidence from Malaysia. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 17(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol17no1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Yusoh, S., Siti-Nabiha, A., & Fuad, N. (2023). Institutional pressures and the adoption of environmental management accounting systems in Malaysia. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(6), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2021-1276 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zainon, N., Mohamad, Z., & Alias, N. (2022). The relevance of ESG disclosure to cost of capital: Evidence from Malaysia. Accounting Research Journal, 35(4), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-07-2021-0145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Bridging the ESG Gap: Tailored Implementation Frameworks for Heterogeneous Firm Sizes and Sectors in Malaysia's Consumer Industry

Authors

Article Information

Publication Timeline

Abstract

Keywords

Downloads

References

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles