A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected Socio-Cultural and Socio-Political Memes among Nigerian Netizens

This study presents a critical multimodal analysis of memes of different socio-cultural and socio-political issues in Nigeria purposively collected from three dominant online platforms - X (Former Twitter), Facebook, and Nairaland, (seven memes each from socio-cultural and socio-political issues) within a period of six-month (December 2024 to May 2025), totalling fourteen memes. The analysis, informed by Theo van Leeuwen's socio-semiotic model and Norman Fairclough's socio-cultural approach to critical discourse studies (CDS), examines both linguistic and non-linguistic resources used to create meaning and impact in the selected memes through a qualitative and comparative methods of analysis. The findings reveal that these memes play crucial roles in mobilizing the electorate and influencing public opinion through persuasion and solidarity-building techniques. The study reveals that political and cultural identities are constructed in the discourse. Socio-political memes can mobilize action, raise awareness, or critique governance and may contribute to polarization or reinforce existing views; while socio-cultural memes foster social connection, shared laughter, or cultural pride and can spark conversations about social norms and cultural values. It confirms that both types of memes can increase engagement with social issues and politics and provide a platform for Nigerians to express themselves and be heard. The study highlights the construction of socio-cultural identities in the discourse and underscores the importance of online platforms in mediating socio-cultural and socio-political memes in Nigeria. The study concludes that memes are not meaningless constructs but are imbued with thoughts, anxieties, ideologies, and identities expressed by Nigerian netizens.

multimodal critical discourse, Nigerian Netizens

1. Adebayo, O. A. (2020). Comic Effect of Internet Memes Among Nigerian Netizens. Journal of The Linguistic Association of Nigeria, 23(1), 36-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adebayo, A. A., & Adeyemo, A. O. (2018). Social media and the political behavior of Nigerian politicians. The Information Society, 25(4), 12-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adebomi, O. (2020). A multimodal analysis of memetic representation of individuals and institutions in Nigeria’s President Muhammadu Buhari administration. Language. Text. Society 7 (1). https://ltsj.online/20 20 - 07 -1- adebomi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adegoju, A. A., & Oyebode, A. O. (2015). The use of Internet memes in the 2015 Nigerian presidential election. Journal of African Elections, 14(1), 111-130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ademilokun, A. (2018). Multimodal discourse analysis of political advertisements in Nigeria's 2015 elections. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(4), 20-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ademilokun M., & Olateju M. (2016). A multimodal discourse analysis of some visual images in the political rally discourse of 2011 electioneering campaigns in southwestern Nigeria. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 4(1):1-19. http://www.ijscl.net/article_14710_3010c06540ab7d35070352e76dd1248a.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ajayi, T., Filani, I., & Akinrinlola, T. (2022). Representation of assumptions and attitudinal perspectives in Nigerian COVID-19 memes. The African Symposium, 18, 22-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Alfred, Bukola (2019). “Analysing verbal and visual indexes in internet memes on the APC led administration and “change” slogan in Nigeria.” Covenant Journal of Language Studies 7(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.20370/xtms-c920. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chilton,P.(2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and Practice, London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dobson, K., & Knezevic, I. (2017). Liking and sharing: The stigmatization of poverty and social welfare: Representations of poverty and welfare through internet memes on social media. Triple C: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 15(2), 777–795. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dzanic, N. D., & Berberovic, S. (2017). ‘#ForgiveUsForWeHaveSinned: Conceptual integration theory and political internet humour. European Journal of Humour Research, 5(2), 4-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Elshierif, E. M. (2018). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Internet Memes about the Egyptian Revolution 2011. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 6(3), 55-65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Grundlingh, Lezandra. 2018. Memes as speech acts. Social Semiotics 28 (2). 147–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Herring, S. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. (eds.). The handbook of discourse analysis, (pp. 612-634). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Huttington, H. (2016). ‘Pepper spray cop and the American dream: using synecdoche and metaphor to unlock internet memes’ visual political rhetoric’. Communication Studies 67(1), pp. 77-93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2007). Online memes, affinities, and cultural production. New York: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication, London: Arnold Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Leong, P. (2015). Political communication in Malaysia: A study on use of new media in politics. Journal of Democracy- Creative commons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis. Los Angeles: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Olateju, M., Oyebode, O., & Ademilokun, M. (2014). Doing multimodal discourse analysis: A practical approach to multimodal analysis. Ibadan: College Press and Publisher Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ope-Davies, T., Adedeji, K., & Aina, O. (2021). Humourising Covid-19 Pandemic Crisis in Nigeria: A Discourse Study of the Selected Online Memes and Posts. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 5(II), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Oyebode, O. (2015). A multimodal discourse analysis of selected outdoor political advertisements for the 2011 elections in Nigeria. A thesis submitted to the Department of English, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Oyebode, O., & Unuabonah F. (2013). Coping with HIV/AIDS: A multimodal discourse analysis of selected HIV/AIDS posters in South-Western Nigeria. In Discourse & Society, 24(6): 810-827. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rezeki, T. I., Sagala, R. W., & Rabukit, R. (2024). From Humour to Impact: Internet Memes in Political Discourse through (de)legitimization. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 8(2), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Saker, M., & Evans, D. (2016). Internet memes and the 2015 UK general election. Information, Communication & Society, 19(8), 1119-1138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 18 (3): 362–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Shifman, L., Coleman, S. & Ward, S. (2007). ‘Only joking?: online humour in the 2003 UK [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. general elections’. Information, Communication and Society10 (4), pp. 465-487. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Tay, G. (2014). ‘Binders full of LOLitics: political humour, internet memes and play in the [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. 2012 US presidential election (and beyond)’. European Journal of Humour Research 2(4), pp. 46-73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Unuabonah, F. O., & Oyebode, O. O. (2021). ‘Nigeria is fighting Covid-419’: A multimodal critical discourse analysis of political protest in Nigerian coronavirus-related internet memes. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(3), 441-462. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Van Dijk T (1998) Opinions and ideologies in the press. In: Bell, A. and Garrett, P. (eds) Approaches to media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 21–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. The handbook of discourse analysis, 349-371 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Van Leeuwen, T. (2015). Multimodality discourse analysis, 447. https://books.google.com.pk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=B45FDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA447&ots=Dy_PIqP2bS&sig=f6euzKkFhXuVirvE12UW7zY3pXs [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Widdowson, H. (2000). Critical practice on representation of text. In Sarangi, S. & Coulthard, M. (eds.) Discourse and Social Life, pp. 155-169. London: Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about? In Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael (eds.) Methods of critical discourse analysis, (pp. 1-13). London: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Communication Strategies among Promoters During MATTA Fair 2025
• An Examination of Colleen Ballinger’s Experience in Social Media: Cancel Culture Chronicle
• Communication Patterns in Conflict Interactions in Premarital Couples Who Are in Abusive Relationships
• Social Media Use on Mental Health Outcomes among Adolescents and Young Adults in Port Harcourt City
• (Un)Successful Error Repairs in L2 Communication