Quality of Training and Management Practices as Key Drivers of Livelihood Sustainability in DOLE-Assisted Projects in a Municipality in Bukidnon

Livelihood programs in the Philippines aim to empower beneficiaries to establish microenterprises and improve socio-economic conditions. Despite these interventions, sustaining livelihood projects remains a persistent challenge due to beneficiaries’ limited managerial skills and inconsistent access to high-quality training. Studies show that deficiencies in financial and managerial competencies can hinder the long-term success of livelihood initiatives, particularly among small-scale and community-based enterprises (Nunnally & Bernstein, 1994; Sachs, 2015). However, existing literature has largely focused on program outputs, with limited examination of how the quality of training and management practices influences long-term sustainability outcomes.
Anchored on Becker’s Human Capital Theory (Becker, 2018), this study assessed the quality of training and management practices among beneficiaries of a government-assisted livelihood project in a municipality in Bukidnon and examined their influence on livelihood sustainability. Using a quantitative, descriptive-correlational design, data were collected from 154 beneficiaries via a factor-analyzed, researcher-modified survey questionnaire and analyzed using means, standard deviations, and multiple linear regression.
Findings revealed high levels of perceived effectiveness and relevance of training, indicating that participants viewed it as practical, skill-enhancing, and aligned with their livelihood activities. Management practices, including monitoring, financial record-keeping, and technical support, were also rated highly, indicating effective program implementation and ongoing guidance. Multiple regression analysis showed that both training quality and management practices significantly influence livelihood sustainability, with management practices emerging as the stronger predictor.
It is recommended to strengthen post-training support mechanisms, enhance monitoring and evaluation systems, and improve organizational and financial management practices. Future researchers are encouraged to examine additional factors such as market access, entrepreneurial competencies, social support, and financial resources, and to replicate similar studies in other localities to validate and expand these findings. These insights provide a foundation for policy refinement and program enhancement of government-assisted livelihood initiatives.

Quality of Training, Management Practices, Livelihood Sustainability

1. Abdullahi, I. M., & Abdullahi, R. (2024). Entrepreneurial marketing practices and SME performance in developing economies—Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adewale, A., & Adeniran, O. (2023). Role of entrepreneurial training on financial literacy and business sustainability in microenterprises. Journal of Small Business Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akther, S., Rahman, M., & Hossain, L. (2024). Management capabilities and sustainable business performance in women-owned SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 62(1), 101–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alam, M., Rahman, M., & Hossain, L. (2020). Financial management practices and operational efficiency among small businesses. Asian Journal of Business and Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arinaitwe, R., & Kobusingye, D. (2025). The impact of financial management practices on the financial performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Uganda. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391046126_The_Impact_of_Financial_Management_Practices_on_the_Financial_Performance_of_Small_and_Medium_Enterprises_SMEs_in_Uganda [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Becker, G. S. (2018). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Briones, R. M. (2017). Sustaining microenterprise development: Lessons from DOLE-assisted livelihood programs. Philippine Journal of Development Studies, 44(2), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE). (2022). Integrated Livelihood Program (DILP) Annual Report. DOLE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Exguria, A. (2016). Livelihood program implementation and sustainability in rural communities. Journal of Philippine Local Government Research, 8(1), 23–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Galang, M. B., & Reyes, L. S. (2025). Effects of livelihood training on enterprise sustainability: A systematic review. International Journal of Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hisrich, R. D., Peters, M. P., & Shepherd, D. A. (2017). Entrepreneurship (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kuratko, D. F. (2021). Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, and practice (12th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Markman, G. D., & Chen, C. C. (2005). Entrepreneurship and self-efficacy: The role of personal belief in venture success. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(2), 157–176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Manasan, R. G. (2016). Evaluation of government livelihood programs in rural areas. Philippine Institute for Development Studies Working Paper Series, 2016-03. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. Institute of Development Studies Working Paper, 72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. STI Extension Livelihood Study. (2024). Sustainability assessment of community-based livelihood programs in the Philippines. STI Research Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar