Different Learning Modality Towards Academic Performance Among Working College Students

Academic performance refers to a student's ability to achieve learning objectives, typically measured through grades, test scores, and overall educational outcomes. The study aimed to examine the different learning modality on the academic performance of working college students. Data were gathered from the 98 working college students. This study used stratified random sampling technique. This study utilized quantitative non-experimental research through a descriptive correlational design. The instruments utilized in this study were modified and thoroughly examined for relevance and accuracy.
The statistical tools used in this study were mean and pearson r. Results revealed that different learning modality towards academic performance among working college students got a descriptive level of high which was oftentimes observed. Working college students' academic performance is positively impacted by a high level of involvement with various learning modalities because it offers them more flexibility, better time management, and easier access to learning materials. According to the relationship between different learning modality and academic performance, students' academic results can be improved by taking into account a variety of learning styles and timetables, especially for those who are juggling work and study obligations

Learning Modality, Academic Performance, Correlational Research Design, Philippine.

1. Adams, R., & Clarke, T. (2020, March 15). Factors influencing engagement and performance in online learning environments. Journal of Education Research, 45(3), 213-228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ally, M. (2019). Competency profile of the digital and online teacher in future education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Belli, G. (2019, January 10). Non-experimental research methods in education and social sciences. Educational Research Review, 12(1), 45-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bernardo, A. B., Cruz, A. G., & Reyes, M. T. (2021, June 20). Challenges of modular learning in the Philippines: Implications for student performance. Philippine Journal of Education, 58(2), 124-138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bernardo, M., Cruz, J., & Santos, R. (2021). Academic success and adaptation to new learning methodologies among college students. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(2), 134-145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bhandari, P. (2020). Quantitative research: The process of gathering and evaluating numerical data. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cahapay, M. B. (2020, July 5). How the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted higher education: A Philippine perspective on learning modalities. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 123-136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2020). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cruz, J., & Santos, R. (2020). Active learning and feedback: Keys to academic performance in college students. Philippine Journal of Education, 35(1), 44-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cruz, J., Mejia, L., & Santos, R. (2021). Online learning and instructional challenges in higher education. International Journal of Digital Learning, 6(3), 210-222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dayon, A. C., Cruz, M. R., & Santiago, L. M. (2018, December 12). Academic performance of working students in higher education institutions: Challenges and strategies. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 55(4), 478-495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. De Guzman, M., & Santos, R. (2021). Blended learning implementation and its effects on student performance and productivity. Asian Journal of Educational Innovation, 9(1), 56-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dorn, E., Hancock, B., Sarakatsannis, J., & Viruleg, E. (2020, May 28). COVID-19 and student learning in the United States: The hurt could last a lifetime. McKinsey & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Garcia, R. T. (2023, February 14). The role of institutional support in online learning: Challenges for working students. Philippine Educational Review, 62(1), 201-217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gonzales, A., & Mejia, L. (2022). Digital competencies and student independence in the online learning setup. Journal of Technology in Education, 10(2), 88-97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hernandez, J. P., & Santos, F. L. (2021, August 21). Balancing work and study: The struggles of working college students in the Philippines. Journal of Higher Education Studies, 44(3), 345-362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hussain, S., Kumar, R., & Singh, P. (2020, November 30). Learning modality preferences and their impact on student engagement. Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 112-125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ignacio, P. T., Dela Cruz, H. R., & Salazar, M. B. (2023, March 9). Impact of different learning modalities on the paramedical students of Dr. Carl Carlos S. Lanting College. Research in Health and Education, 29(2), 89-105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jones, K. (2022, May 14). Understanding learning preferences: How modality impacts academic outcomes in UK higher education institutions. British Journal of Education, 39(3), 184-202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Keskin, S. (2019). Factors affecting students’ preferences for online and blended learning: Motivational vs. cognitive. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning (EURODL), 22(2), 72-86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Khan, Z. (2020, September 4). Total sampling and research accuracy: A study on its effectiveness. International Journal of Research Methodology, 22(1), 41-55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2020, November 25). Experiential learning theory: A dynamic approach to understanding learning styles and their impact on education. Educational Psychology, 45(3), 321-338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lee, J. (2023, March 11). Digital divide in online learning: Examining the effects of poor connectivity on student achievement in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Research, 51(2), 97-113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Li, J., Zhao, W., & Xu, Z. (2020, July 7). Statistical methods in education research: Application of mean and correlation analysis. Educational Statistics Quarterly, 28(4), 412-428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lim, J., & Garcia, M. (2020). Influence of learning environment and motivation on academic outcomes. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 14(3), 102-115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. McLeod, S. (2017, October 20). Kolb's experiential learning theory and its applications in modern education. Educational Psychology Review, 42(1), 78-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2020, April 29). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of educational research. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2020, December 19). Student barriers to online learning: A comparative study of Brazil and the United States. Journal of Distance Education, 35(2), 123-145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Navarro, R., & Lim, J. (2020). Student focus and distraction in hybrid education models. Southeast Asian Review of Education, 8(2), 75-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nguyen, T. T., Brown, K. A., & Smith, L. H. (2020, March 8). Stratified random sampling in educational research: Advantages and limitations. Journal of Educational Research Methods, 44(1), 57-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Reyes, D. L., Santos, M. P., & Fernandez, R. A. (2022, August 6). Online learning management systems and their impact on student performance: A study in Davao City, Philippines. Southeast Asian Journal of Education, 19(1), 67-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Reyes, P., & Delos Santos, C. (2021). Evaluating the role of learning modality in academic achievement. Philippine Educational Journal, 18(1), 31-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Rosello, J. M., Cruz, R. P., & Velasquez, T. (2023, May 17). Adapting to online education: The impact of digital learning tools on student engagement and comprehension. Journal of Digital Education Research, 30(2), 102-120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Santos, R., & Rivera, K. (2021). Face-to-face learning and student engagement in higher education. Journal of Instructional Methods, 12(4), 90-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2021). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Stratton, J. R. (2019, February 12). Sampling methods in educational research: Ensuring precision and eliminating error. Educational Research Review, 17(1), 10-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019, October 30). Cognitive load theory in the digital age: Applications and future directions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), 281-304. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tadesse, T., & Gillies, R. M. (2021, December 3). Student academic performance in different learning environments: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 187-205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tadesse, T., Ware, H., Asmare, A., & Gillies, R. M. (2024). Enhancing Student Engagement and Outcomes: The Effects of Cooperative Learning in an Ethiopian University’s Classrooms. Education Sciences, 14(9), 975. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Torres, M., & Lim, J. (2023). Balancing responsibilities and academic success among working students. Education and Society Journal, 7(1), 23-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Walker, R., Smith, P., & Harris, L. (2024, January 28). Learning preferences and academic success: Exploring the impact of mismatched teaching strategies in higher education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 39(2), 98-115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Weisburd, D., Britt, C. L., & Kats, A. (2020, June 10). Statistics in criminology and criminal justice (5th ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Yardley, S., Teunissen, P. W., & Dornan, T. (2019, April 14). Experiential learning in medical education: Theoretical perspectives and practical applications. Medical Education Review, 53(1), 12-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Zarei, N., & Vijayan, K. (2023). The impact of learning styles on student's academic performance. Research Journal of English, 8(3), 83–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]