The Lived Experiences of College Students Navigating Technostress Through AI Learning Tools

This qualitative phenomenological study explored the experience of college students in navigating technostress while using AI learning tools in higher education. Through purposive sampling, 10 undergraduate students who use AI tools such as ChatGPT or AI‑integrated learning management systems for at least one month were invited to participate in semi‑structured interviews. Thematic analysis yielded nine themes across four dimensions: affective, behavioral, cognitive and ethical reflecting students’ emotional strain, patterns of reliance, metacognitive regulation and academic integrity concerns. Findings showed that unclear institutional policies and inconsistent faculty expectations intensify technostress while students cope through peer support, self‑imposed digital boundaries and critical verification of AI‑generated outputs. Participants articulated tensions between efficiency and originality. The study emphasizes the need for culturally grounded AI literacy, clearer guidelines on responsible AI use, and supportive learning environments that foster critical thinking, academic integrity and sustainable technology practices in line with quality and well‑being goals in higher education.

Technostress, AI learning tools, Academic integrity

1. Abbas, A., Rincón, G. B., Wang, L., & Siddiqui, M. K. (2023). Investigating the impact of technostress on perceived hybrid learning environment and academic performance. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 21(4), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.4.3084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abubakar, S., Jeilani, A., & Yusuf, M. (2025). The role of over-reliance on AI in the negative consequences of student learning: The moderating effects of ethical concerns and institutional policies. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2591503 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al Nabhani, F., Hamzah, M. B., & Abuhassna, H. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in personalizing educational content: Enhancing the learning experience and developing the teacher’s role in an integrated educational environment. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(2), ep573. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16089 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5261–5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Azevedo, R., & Aleven, V. (2013). Metacognition and learning technologies: An overview of current interdisciplinary research. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bahamondes-Rosado, M. E., Cerdá-Suárez, L. M., & Espinosa-Cristia, J. F. (2023). Technostress at work during the COVID-19 lockdown phase (2020–2021): A systematic review of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1173425. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Balalle, H., & Pannilage, S. (2025). Reassessing academic integrity in the age of AI: A systematic literature review on AI and academic integrity. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101299 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bohari, A., Kaliappan, A., & Loh, S. L. (2025). AI LITERACY BEYOND STEM: RETHINKING TEACHER EDUCATION FOR THE AI ERA. International Journal of Humanities Technology and Civilization, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijhtc.v10i2.13274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chan, C.K.Y., Hu, W. Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 20, 43 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, L., Chen, P. and Lin, Z. (2020) Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chukwuere, J. E., & Chukwuere, G. C. J. . (2025). Technostress factors among students in the adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education: A rapid review narrative. International Conference on Emerging Technology and Interdisciplinary Sciences, 37–45. Retrieved from https://conferences.jozacpublishers.com/index.php/icetis/article/view/53 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cook, G., Van Belle, J., Ali, W., Atanasoff, L., Venable, M., Chiappetta, M., Daud, K., Khidzir, N., Ismail, A., Abdullah, F., Dragano, N., Lunau, T., Fuglseth, A., Sreb, Hauk, N., Gritz, A., Krumm, S., Ginsberg, S., Torre, L., ... Armstrong, D. (2022). Analysis of technostress experienced by students at the University of Cape Town during the COVID-19 pandemic. Issues in Information Systems, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.48009/1_iis_2022_106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. De Guzman, M. J. A. (2024). Technostress among college students in the new normal. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 13(12), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR241202081157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gopo, C. (2022). The role of technology in the 21st century education of learners. The Official Research Journal of Tagum City Division, 18(6), 357–361. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gutierrez, R. (2025). Development of adaptive and emotionally intelligent educational assistants based on conversational artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Computer Science, 7, Article 1628104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1628104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Handayani, Y. S., & Sulastri, A. (2022). Teacher resilience facing technostress in the implementation of synchronous hybrid learning in elementary school. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 639. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220203.027. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Heckman, S., Lim, H., & Montalto, C. (2024). Factors Related to Financial Stress among College Students. Journal of Financial Therapy, 5 (1) 3. https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-9771.1063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hennekeuser, Darius & Vaziri, Daryoush & Golchinfar, David & Schreiber, Dirk & Stevens, Gunnar. (2024). Enlarged Education – Exploring the Use of Generative AI to Support Lecturing in Higher Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 35. 10.1007/s40593-024-00424-y. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57, 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Idroes, G. M., Noviandy, T. R., Maulana, A., Irvanizam, I., Jalil, Z., Lensoni, L., Lala, A., Abas, A. H., Tallei, T. E., & Idroes, R. (2023). Student perspectives on the role of artificial intelligence in education: A survey-based analysis. Journal of Educational Management and Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v1i1.58 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Rabe, M. N., Schmidt-Alfen, J., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Khlaif, Z. N., Hamamra, B., Bensalem, E., Mitwally, M. A. A., & Sanmugam, M. (2025). Factors influencing educators’ technostress while using generative AI: A qualitative study. Technology,. Knowledge, and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09885-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kofinas, A. K., Tsay, C.-H., & Pike, D. (2025). The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 2522–2549. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kumar, P. S. (2024). TECHNOSTRESS: A comprehensive literature review on dimensions, impacts, and management strategies. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 16, 100475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100475 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: Higher education students’ perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Pacheco, A. J., Boude Figueredo, O. R., Chiappe, A., & Fontán de Bedout, L. (2025). AI-powered learning analytics for metacognitive and socioemotional development: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1672901. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1672901 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Paja, P. J. L., Serado, M. A., Romanillos, P. D., Aguadera, D. D., & Buladaco, M. V. M. (2020). The relationship of technology as a learning tool to student motivation in education among college students in Davao Del Norte State College. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 4(6), 266–277. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Pilapil, A. P., Espra, N. J. C., Colubio, E. P., Enerio, R. S., Jr., Lintuan, C. A., Malbas, A., & Tubera, F. D., Jr. (2024). AI-driven learning: Navigating the experiences of BSED students in utilizing AI tools in technology-integrated classrooms in Kolehiyo ng Pantukan. Kolehiyo ng Pantukan. https://doi.org/10.17613/11jtf-qq465 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Salo, M., Pirkkalainen, H., & Koskelainen, T. (2019). Technostress and social networking services: Explaining users’ concentration, sleep, identity, and social relation problems. Information Systems Journal, 29(2), 408–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Saleem F, Chikhaoui E and Malik MI (2024) Technostress in students and quality of online learning: role of instructor and university support. Front. Educ. 9:1309642. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1309642. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Senayah, W. K., & Tei-Narh, N. (2025). Unpacking technostress and continuance intention in AI adoption: A uses and gratification theory. International Journal of Home Economics, 18(1), 84–107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Sichterman, B., Noroozi, O., Boetje, J., van Ginkel, S., Khosravi, H., & Versendaal, J. (2025). Supporting peer learning with artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(5), 1648–1664. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2530118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., & Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sulasula, J. (2023). Exploring the viability of smart public universities in the Philippines’ Zamboanga Peninsula Region. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4519456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. TALILI, Z. R. J., & LUCERO , J. J. (2025). A Qualitative Study of Teachers & Students’ Perspectives on AI-assisted Academic Writing. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 2(7), 228-237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Tan, M. J. T., & Maravilla, N. M. A. T. (2024). Shaping integrity: why generative artificial intelligence does not have to undermine education. Frontiers in artificial intelligence. 7:1471224. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1471224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Torales J.Torres-Romero A. D. Di Giuseppe M. F. Rolón-Méndez E. R. Martínez-López P. L.Heinichen-Mansfeld K. V.et al. (2022). Technostress, anxiety, and depression among university students: a report from Paraguay. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 68, 1063–1070. doi: 10.1177/00207640221099416 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2015). Technostress: Negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Tarafdar, M., Maier, C., Laumer, S., & Weitzel, T. (2020). Explaining the link between technostress and technology addiction for social networking sites: A study of distraction as a coping behavior. Information Systems Journal, 30(1), 96–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12253 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. eBooks. https://doi.org/10.54675/ewzm9535. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Upadhyaya, P., & Vrinda. (2021). Impact of technostress on academic productivity of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1647–1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10319-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Vallone F, Galvin J, Cattaneo Della Volta MF, Akhtar A, Chua S, Ghio E, Giovazolias T, Kazakou Z, Kritikou M, Koutra K, Kovacevic S, Lee-Treweek G, Mašková I, Mavritsaki E, Nastic J, Plassova M, Stuchlíková I and Zurlo MC (2023) Technostress and academic motivation: direct and indirect effects on university students' psychological health. Front. Psychol. 14:1211134. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15, Article 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Yadav, A., & Rahaman, A. (2020). Technostress level of teachers in higher education with reference to socio-demographic variables. Periodic Research, 9(2), pp 58-65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Yang, D., Liu, J., Wang, H., Chen, P., Wang, C., & Metwally, A.H. (2025). Technostress among teachers: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 168, 108619. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Zhou, X., Zhang, J., & Chan, C. (2024). Unveiling students’ experiences and perceptions of artificial intelligence usage in higher education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. https://doi.org/10.53761/xzjprb23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being