Job Satisfaction and Career Growth Opportunities for Gig-Based Virtual Assistants in Bicol Region

Authors

Karen Joy A. Sapico

Graduate School, School of Business and Accountancy, University of Nueva Caceres, Naga City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300500

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 6870-6876

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-23

Accepted: 2026-03-28

Published: 2026-04-14

Abstract

This study examined job satisfaction, perceived career growth opportunities, and challenges experienced by gig-based virtual assistants in the Bicol Region, Philippines. Using a quantitative descriptive research design, data were collected from 60 virtual assistants through structured questionnaires. Job satisfaction was measured in terms of compensation, autonomy, and work–life balance, while career growth opportunities were assessed through training, skill development, and advancement prospects. Results revealed that respondents were generally satisfied with compensation (WM = 3.65) and work–life balance (WM = 3.52), while autonomy showed a moderate level of satisfaction (WM = 3.40). Career growth opportunities were positively perceived, particularly in training and skill development, although advancement pathways were less clearly defined. Among the challenges, workload management emerged as the most significant concern, followed by communication barriers and misaligned client expectations. The findings indicate that while virtual assistant work provides flexibility and income opportunities, improvements in workload management, communication systems, and structured career pathways are necessary to enhance long-term sustainability. The study contributes to the growing literature on gig economy employment by providing localized insights and practical recommendations for virtual assistants and stakeholders.

Keywords

job satisfaction, virtual assistants, gig economy

Downloads

References

1. Fiers, F. (2024). Digital skills in the gig economy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmae014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.) 31. 75-77. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Kässi, O., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2021). Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Graham, M., & Anwar, M. A. (2021). The global gig economy: Towards a planetary labour market? First Monday, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i4.9913 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. George, A. S. (2024). Gig economy 2.0: Examining how smart technologies could revolutionize on-demand work. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13334926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Sarmiento, A. G. (2025). The labor market transitions of young workers. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(9), 622–635. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2021). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Heeks, R. (2021). Decent work and the digital gig economy: A developing country perspective. Development Informatics Working Paper Series. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Sutherland, W., Jarrahi, M. H., Dunn, M., & Nelson, S. B. (2020). Work precarity and gig literacies in online freelancing. Work, Employment and Society, 34(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019886511 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Niebuhr, F., Borle, P., Börner-Zobel, F., & Voelter-Mahlknecht, S. (2022). Healthy and happy working from home? Effects on job satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1122. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Qiu, F., & Dauth, T. (2022). Virtual work intensity and job satisfaction. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 36(1), 77–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002221998227 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. García-Salirrosas, E. E., Rondon-Eusebio, R. F., Geraldo-Campos, L. A., & Acevedo-Duque, Á. (2023). Job satisfaction in remote work. Behavioral Sciences, 13(11), 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110916 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands–resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Buonomo, I., De Vincenzi, C., Pansini, M., D’Anna, F., & Benevene, P. (2024). Work–life balance in remote work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(6), 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21060770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles