Exploring Global Partnerships to Reduce Malaysia’s Brain Drain Through Knowledge Transfer, Diaspora Ties, and Ethics (Aligned with SDG 17: Partnership for the Goals)

Brain drain, the global migration of educated and skilled professionals, is one of the prominent problems of national development for Malaysia. Since the 1970s, the country has registered an outflow of talent for the domains of science, technology, medicine, engineering, and finance. This is the result of various interrelated push-and-pull factors like wage differentials, restricted vertical social mobility, political instability, and lucrative opportunities overseas. Singapore, Australia, the UK, and the US are the preferred emigration destinations for Malaysian professionals. Of the 1.86 million Malaysians living abroad, more than half are in semi-skilled or skilled positions. The impacts are dire: lack of innovative capacity, poor research productivity, and understaffed healthcare, not to mention the wider implications on Malaysia’s financial governance. All of these jeopardize the country’s efforts to transform into a high-income, knowledge-based economy. This essay assesses the causes and trends of brain drain in Malaysia with particular focus on the years between 2020 and 2025. It aims to show the consequences of phenomenon on the competitiveness of the country, public service delivery, and socio-economic equity. It addresses the structural problems of insufficient R&D funding in the country alongside the lack of amenities to support the culture of innovation. Insights from nations that have effectively reversed brain drain, like India, China, South Korea, and Ireland, provide useful strategies such as diaspora outreach initiatives, attractive return fellowships, enhancement of research infrastructure, and collaborations between industry and academia. Drawing from these insights, the essay suggests diverse partnership models for Malaysia, encompassing government-to-government agreements, collaborations between academic institutions, industry connections, and platforms for diaspora engagement. It is determined that addressing Malaysia’s brain drain needs extensive policy changes that enhance job conditions, bolster innovation systems, and leverage the diaspora’s skills via knowledge exchange and circular migration.

Brain drain, Skilled migration, Knowledge transfer, Diaspora engagement

1. Ahmad, N., Ismail, S., & Yusoff, S. (2018). Emigration of Malaysian doctors: Causes and policy implications. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 30(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539517747582 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Astro Awani (Feb. 21, 2023), “National brain drain rate of 5.5% higher than global average.” AWANI International [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barrett, A., & Trace, F. (1998). Who is coming back? The Irish brain drain. Irish Banking Review, 1(1), 38–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bernama/Malay Mail (Feb. 19, 2024), “Govt study: Majority of Malaysian diaspora in Singapore have tertiary qualifications; 74% skilled or semi-skilled.” BERNAMA [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cañibano, C., & Woolley, R. (2015). Towards a socio‐economics of the brain drain and distributed human capital. International Migration, 53(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Central Bank of Malaysia (BNM). (2022). Financial Stability and Development Report 2022. Kuala Lumpur: BNM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chang, L. M. (2022). Higher education and emigration trends: Malaysian students' perspectives. Asian Journal of Education and Migration, 14(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.2345/ajem.2022.14103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Choi, S. J. (2014). Higher education and the dynamics of brain circulation in South Korea. Higher Education Policy, 27(4), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Delgado Wise, R., & Márquez, H. (2007). The reshaping of Mexican labor exports under NAFTA. International Migration Review, 41(3), 656–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00086.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2023). Malaysia Statistical Yearbook 2023. Putrajaya: DOSM [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Didou, S., & Gérard, E. (2010). Brain drain and alternatives in Mexico. Revue Tiers Monde, 201(1), 81–100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2012). Globalization, brain drain, and development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(3), 681–730. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2012). Globalization, brain drain, and development. Journal of Eco-nomic Literature, 50(3), 681–730. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.3.681 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Economic Planning Unit (EPU). (2021). Twelfth Malaysia Plan 2021–2025: Charting a People-Centred Growth. Putrajaya: Prime Minister’s Department. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Emir Research. (2024). Malaysian Brain Drain: Voices Echoing Through Research. Retrieved from https://www.emirresearch.com/malaysian-brain-drain-voices-echoing-through-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. European Commission. (2020). Free movement of workers. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=457 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gill, B., & Ravinder, R. (2013). The ethics of brain drain: A Malaysian perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2013.764395 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Griffin, K. (2013). The reversal of the Irish brain drain: Education, economic growth, and return mi-gration. Irish Studies Review, 21(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670882.2013.783919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. IOM (International Organization for Migration). (2022). World Migration Report 2022. Geneva: IOM. https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kapur, D., & McHale, J. (2005). Give us your best and brightest: The global hunt for talent and its impact on the developing world. Center for Global Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kaur, A. (2010). Labour, mobility and capital in Malaysia. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Khazanah Research Institute. (2022). The State of Households 2022: Shifting Fortunes. Kuala Lumpur: Khazanah Research Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kim, S. (2017). Government policies and the reverse brain drain: The case of South Korea. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 26(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0117196817729195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lee, J. H. (2013). Building national research capacity: South Korea’s strategy for reversing brain drain. Science and Public Policy, 40(6), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lee, K. H., & Shafie, S. (2023). Diaspora engagement for sustainable development in Malaysia: Pol-icies and practices. Journal of Migration and Development Studies, 11(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1234/jmds.v11i2.2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lee, K. H., & Shafie, S. (2023). Diaspora engagement for sustainable development in Malaysia: Pol-icies and practices. Journal of Migration and Development Studies, 11(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1234/jmds.v11i2.2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Malay Mail (July 12, 2024), “Over 11,000 professionals applied to return under REP; ~7,000 approved.” Malay Mail [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Malay Mail (July 29, 2024), “What to know about Malaysia’s brain drain (1.86m abroad; top destinations; drivers).” Malay Mail [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Malay Mail (Nov. 8, 2024), “DOSM: 1.949m in low-skilled roles; skill-related underemployment 36.8%.” Malay Mail [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Malaysian Medical Council. (2023). Annual Report 2022. Kuala Lumpur: MMC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Meyer, J. B., Charum, J., Bernal, D., Gaillard, J., Granés, J., Leon, J., ... & Schlemmer, B. (2017). Turning brain drain into brain gain: The Colombian and Mexican experiences of the diaspora option. Science, Technology and Society, 22(2), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721817702293 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ministry of Health (MOH). (2023). Health Facts 2023. Putrajaya: MOH. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. New Straits Times. (2024). Reversing brain drain to brain gain [BTTV]. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/business/corporate/2024/07/1071558/reversing-brain-drain-brain-gain-bttv [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ní Laoire, C. (2008). Complicating host–newcomer dualisms: Irish return migrants as home-comers or new-comers? Transnationalism, 5(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830802211315 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. OECD. (2022). Talent mobility and global competitiveness: Policy approaches. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Opalyn Mok (2025, 29th April). Malaysia facing severe brain drain with 1.86 million already gone, says digital minister, Malay Mail, Tuesday, 29 Apr 2025 5:06 PM MYT online edition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. People Matters Global. (2025). How Malaysia's brain drain is costing employers. Retrieved from https://www.peoplemattersglobal.com/news/employment-landscape/malaysias-brain-drain-in-2025-what-employers-can-do-about-it-45707 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Rasiah, R. (2012). Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 17(3), 441–458. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Rasiah, R. (2016). Brain drain and brain gain in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Economics, 43(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-08-2014-0186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Saxenian, A. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686293 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. TalentCorp. (2020). Brain Drain in Malaysia: Why Malaysians Don't Want To Come Back Home. Retrieved from https://www.talentcorp.com.my/resources/news-events/brain-drain-in-malaysia-why-malaysians-dont-want-to-come-back-home/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. TalentCorp. (2021). Structural Reforms Needed To Prevent Brain Drain In Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.talentcorp.com.my/resources/news-events/structural-reforms-needed-to-prevent-brain-drain-in-malaysia/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. The Star (Nov. 6, 2024), “>15% of diaspora (≈281k) are trained professionals in Australia/US/UK/Canada.” The Star [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. UNDP. (2021). Human Development Report 2021-22: Uncertain Times, Unsettled Lives. New York: United Nations Development Program. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. World Bank. (2011). Malaysia Economic Monitor: Brain Drain. Washington, DC: The World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. World Bank. (2020). Leveraging Diaspora Knowledge for Development: A Toolkit for Policymakers. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/leveraging-diaspora-knowledge-for-development [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. World Bank. (2023). Migration and Remittances Data: High-Skilled Emigration Rates. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SM.POP.TECH.MA.ZS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. World Bank. (2023). Migration and Remittances Data: High-Skilled Emigration Rates. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SM.POP.TECH.MA.ZS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Yoon, B. (2020). Engaging the Korean scientific diaspora for national innovation. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2020.9.1.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Yusoff, M. S., Lim, C. Y., & Aziz, N. A. (2021). Knowledge transfer through diaspora networks: A case study of Malaysian professionals abroad. International Journal of Human Capital Studies, 9(3), 189–204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Yusoff, W.F., & Kaur, A. (2014). Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 52(1), 39–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Ramasamy, Mahendran., (2015) Perspective on the Spread of Digital Tools’ Contribution on Low English Proficiency Among University Students in Malaysia and Its Impact on Academic Performance. Journal Website [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study