Interplay of Instructional Approaches, Appropriate Resources, Attitudes Towards Agriculture and Fieldwork Performance in Animal and Dairy Science

Effective agricultural education requires the bridging of theoretical knowledge with practical field competence. Grounded in Constructivist Theory, this study examined whether instructional approaches, appropriate resources, and students’ attitudes toward agriculture influence fieldwork performance in Animal and Dairy Science programs. A descriptive correlational research design was used. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire validated by experts and pilot-tested, demonstrating strong reliability and internal consistency. Confirmatory Factor Analysis established construct validity and acceptable model fit. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the study variables, while multiple regression analysis was used to test the influence of instructional approaches, appropriate resources, and students’ attitudes toward agriculture on fieldwork performance. The findings showed that instructional approaches and appropriate resources were rated as generally high, along with students’ attitudes toward agriculture, which were rated as generally very high. Fieldwork performance was at an average level, indicating that the students demonstrated a satisfactory level of foundational competence in performing basic practical field tasks. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the combined variables significantly influenced fieldwork performance, although they explained only a small proportion of the variance. Among these factors, only students’ attitudes toward agriculture significantly influenced fieldwork performance, while instructional approaches and appropriate resources showed no significant individual effects. The findings highlight the importance of fostering positive attitudes, providing adequate resources, and implementing effective instructional approaches. This study provides practical guidance for educators and program developers to strengthen experiential learning and prepare students for real-world agricultural practice. It recommends that future research incorporate institutionalized performance rubrics to more comprehensively assess practical skills.

Animal and dairy science, Appropriate resources, Attitudes towards agriculture, Fieldwork performance, Instructional approaches

1. Alrawashdeh, G. S., Lindgren, S. A., Reyes, M. R., & Pisey, S. (2022). Developing youth’s capacities as active partners in achieving sustainable global food security through education. IEEE International Conference on Solid Dielectrics. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022015028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arihana, A. A., & Iksan, Z. H. (2023). Acquiring practical and soft skills through field work among science students in higher education institutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i2/17482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Balachandran, A., & Mahalakshmi, T. (2023). E-Learning. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 132–137. https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-12924 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baliyan, S. P., Malebalwa, K., Keregero, K. J. B., & Mabusa, K. (2021). Poor academic performance of students in agriculture at primary schools in Botswana: Analysis of causes and ways to improve. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(9), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.20.9.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Calsamiglia, C., & Loviglio, A. (2020). Maturity and school outcomes in an inflexible system: Evidence from Catalonia. SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, 11(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13209-019-0196-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publication [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. David, D. J. (2022). Constructivism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138609877ree32-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Erickson, M., Ranathunga, S. D., & Wattiaux, M. A. (2020). Animal sciences undergraduate education since the ASAS centennial: A national survey and scoping review. Translational Animal Science, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/TAS/TXAA202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gisip, J., Ibrahim, N., Ratim, S., & Abdul Ghani, F. S. (2024). Open educational resources (OER) in e-learning for higher education. International Journal on E-Learning and Higher Education, 19(2), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijelhe.v19n2.19227 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lazaro, J. M. V., & Paglinawan, J. L. (2025). Laboratory resource availability and students’ engagement in science. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 9(12), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.51584/ijrias.2024.912015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mara, E.-L., & Morar, L.-L. (2024). Mentor and mentored person: Relationships and perspectives. KBO, 30, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2024-0066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mustika, B., & Hamidah, A. (2025). Facilities and infrastructure in improving learning quality based on recent literature review 2020–2025: A systematic literature review (SLR). Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 15(2), 562–568. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v15i2.2637 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Odili, N., Adetona, C. O., & Eneh, A. E. (2020). Online resources for e-learning in educational institutions: A case of Covid-19 era. International Journal of Research, 7(10),95–102. https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.7_Issue.10_Oct2020/IJRR0013.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pommerening, A. (2021). Empowering researchers: Academic mentoring (pp. 121). Springer Nature Link, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65467-2_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Putri, A. S., Radandima, G. U. E., & Setiawan, A. (2024). Analysis of the constructivist approach in the learning process of public policy. Jejaring Administrasi Publik, 162), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.20473/jap.v16i2.53461 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ragland, E. C., & Karcher, E. (2023). The implementation of inquiry-based learning activities in an introductory animal science course. NACTA Journal, 66(1). https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v66i1.66 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rayment, S. J., Evans, J., Coffey, M., Kirk, S. H., Sivasubramaniam, S., & Moss, K. (2023). The role of technology in undergraduate bioscience laboratory learning: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. Education Sciences, 13(8), 766. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Scott, J., Rubenstein, E. D., & Pringle, T. D. (2023). Examining the impact of experiential learning activities on student performance in an introductory animal science course. NACTA Journal, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Stwalley, R. (2023). Creating agricultural technology lessons for high school students to stimulate interest in long-term career possibilities and collegiate ABE and ASM matriculation. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-242796 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wang, F. (2024). The relationship between students and teachers and its implications. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54097/rzvpb402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ye, R., Kodo, T., Hirooka, Y., Sanara, H., Soben, K., Kobayashi, S., & Homma, K. (2022). Educational trials to quantify agronomic information in interdisciplinary fieldwork in Pursat Province, Cambodia. Sustainability, 14(16), 10007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Effect of Human Capital Formation on Agricultural Productivity in Southeast, Nigeria