“Elderly Rights in India: A Critical Review of Laws, Policies, and Practices”

India’s elderly population, projected to surge to 230 million (15% of total) by 2036, faces acute vulnerabilities amid nuclear families, migration, and rising elder abuse. This critical review dissects the normative architecture of laws, policies, and practices governing elderly rights, exposing a persistent implementation deficit that undermines constitutional promises of dignity and security.
The foundational framework rests on Article 21 (Right to Life with Dignity) and Article 41 (Public Assistance in Old Age) of the Constitution. The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (MWPSC Act) imposes a statutory duty on children and relatives to provide maintenance (Sections 4–5), establishes Maintenance Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals for summary proceedings, and, crucially, under Section 23, deems property transfers (gifts, sales, etc.) voidable if the transferee fails to furnish basic amenities, medical care, or shelter, treating such failure as fraud or undue influence. Complementary measures include the National Policy on Older Persons (1999), the National Policy for Senior Citizens (2011), the National Programme for Health Care of the Elderly (NPHCE), Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme, and the Senior Citizens Welfare Fund. The 2019 Amendment Bill, which sought to broaden definitions of “Children” and “Parents”, remove maintenance ceilings, mandate police nodal officers, and establish care homes, lapsed without enactment, reflecting legislative inertia.
Critically, the MWPSC Act’s welfare intent is diluted by structural infirmities: chronic delays in tribunals, abysmal rural awareness, inadequate old-age homes (far below one-per-district mandate), weak inter-ministerial coordination, and judicial overload. Elder neglect—financial, emotional, and physical—thrives in urbanising India, while property disputes reveal entrenched filial entitlement and patriarchal property norms. Schemes remain fragmented, underfunded, and urban-biased, failing to address geriatric healthcare, digital exclusion, or long-term care.
Judicial activism has partially bridged these gaps through purposive, liberal construction. In Urmila Dixit v. Sunil Sharan Dixit (2025 INSC 20), the Supreme Court (Karol & Ravikumar, JJ.) annulled a 2019 gift deed despite an implicit (not express) maintenance condition evidenced by a contemporaneous promissory note, affirming tribunals’ power to declare transfers void, order eviction, and restore possession. The Court mandated a beneficial, non-technical interpretation to advance the Act’s object. Reinforcing this, Kamalakant Mishra v. Additional Collector (2025 SCC OnLine SC 2077, Nath & Mehta, JJ.) upheld eviction of a financially independent son from two Mumbai properties after he denied his 80- and 78-year-old parents re-entry. The Court corrected the Bombay High Court’s erroneous senior-citizen presumption and reiterated that tribunals possess inherent authority to evict for breach of statutory obligations, construing the Act liberally as welfare legislation.
These decisions uphold the broad remedial competence of tribunals, but they also draw attention to inconsistencies: certain High Court opinions warn against compulsory eviction in cases where maintenance is provided without harassment (Samtola Devi, 2025). This discrepancy emphasizes the necessity of Supreme Court rules, mandated deadlines, tribunal capacity-building, and digital file integration.
In conclusion, structural flaws such as enforcement deficiencies, policy obsolescence, and the sociocultural deterioration of filial obligation continue to put older people in precarious situations, even if the MWPSC Act and court interventions represent positive progress. In order to convert legal rights into lived dignity, immediate reforms are required, including the adoption of a new comprehensive policy, national awareness campaigns, specialized geriatric infrastructure, and strict monitoring. Only then will India be able to fulfil its moral and constitutional obligations to its elderly population.

Elderly Rights in India, Maintenance and Welfare of Parents

1. NITI Aayog, Government of India. Senior Care Reforms in India – Reimagining the Senior Care Paradigm: A Position Paper. 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Gregor-Issac, T., Ramesh, A., et al. Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007: A Critical Appraisal. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2021;43(5 Suppl):S107-S112. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176211043932 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Gupta,A. Understanding Elderly Care in India: Cultural and Social Insights. Samarth Care. 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adv. Agarwal, P. Understanding the Rights of Senior Citizens. 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Yodda. Navigating Government Policies on Elder Care in India. 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. TribecaCare. Elder Rights and Expectations. 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Neel, A. Landmark Judgments on the Rights of Elderly Parents. 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Asst, Prof. Mahadeo-Chavan, A. PROTECTING THE ELDERLY: JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE RESPONSES TO PROPERLY TRANSFERS UNDER THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007. Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law. 2025;V(V): 1105-1115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. AGGRWA, A. The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007: Safeguarding Elderly Rights in India. KHURANA & KHURANA. 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Tanushree & Pandey, S. EXPLORING HOW LAWS PROTECT OLDER PEOPLE: A STUDY ON WHAT RULES HELP SENIORS LIVE WELL?”. Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law. 2024;IV(II):212-225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. PRS LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH. The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Bill, 2019. Social Jusitice and Empowerment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Esther-Thomas, S. Law and its discontents: ageing and Family Law in India. Journal of Social and Economic Development. 2023: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-022-00211-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. National Human Rights Commission, India. RIGHTS OF SENIOR CITIZENS. 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Amanullah & Dr. Kumar, R. The Legal Aspects of Rights of Senior Citizens and Their Maintenance in India. KRONIKA JOURNAL. 2025;25(2):62-72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kaur-Uppal, R & Veer-Singh, U. Legal Protection to Elderly Person’s Rights in India: A Socio-Legal Study in Present Context. Advances in Consumer Research. 2025; 5: 2287-2291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Your Rights. Senior Citizen Rights. CSIC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. RIGHTS OF MINORITIES AND OTHER MARGINALISED GROUPS. 21. Rights of the Elderly in India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The Gazette of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sandhu, A.S. The Legal Framework for the Protection of Senior Citizens in India. Smalegal. 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Priya, K. & Jha, M. Policy Response to Prevent Elder Abuse in India and Selected Countries. Handbook of Aging, Health and Public Policy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7842-7_60 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Citizen Rights Protection Council. WHAT ARE SENIOR CITIZEN RIGHTS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. altacit global. Laws Protecting Rights and Interests of Senior Citizens in India. 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Chanchlani Law World!. ELDERLY ABUSE – AN OVERVIEW OF SOCIAL AND LEGAL RIGHTS IN INDIA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INTELLIGENCE. Senior Citizen Rights. 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kumar-Iyer, A. Important Legislations and Schemes related to Senior Citizens in India. Senior Living Assessment Form. Elements. 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Government of India. An Umbrella Scheme for Senior Citizens: National Action Plan for Welfare of Senior Citizens (NAPSrC). Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Social Welfare/Rehabilitation Services. National Policy on Older Persons. Government of NCT of Delhi. 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. National Health Mission. National Programme for Healthcare of Elderly (NPHCE). Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Chopra, A. March Benefits Alert! Social Security Payment Schedule and Timeline Every Recipient Should Track. The Daily Finance. Boscoindustry. 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Utsav, R. & Abhiruchi, G. The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 – Helping the conditions of the elderly in India. Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine. 2019; 5(2): 157-161. DOI: 10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_40_19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Social Policies and Administration. Addressing the Needs of Senior Citizens in India. PubAdmin Institute. 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Pathak, S. Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007: A review paper. International Journal of Law. 2026; 12(1): 286-289. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Jiyauddin, Md & Dr. Banerjee,S. “An Examination of Older Persons’ Issues and Legal Rights under the Indian Constitution from a Critical Perspective”. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities (2024). Vol. No. 7(3): 3623-3633. DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.117862 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Neel, A. “Landmark Judgments on the Rights of Elderly Parents”. Legal Bites. 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Social Justice. “National Policy for Senior Citizens”. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Helpage. “Policy-in-practice case study: India”. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Prof. (Dr). Ahmad, M. & Chaudhary, D.K. “LEGAL RESPONSES TO POPULATION AGEING: ANALYSING ELDER CARE LAWS AND POLICIES IN INDIA, JAPAN, AND THE UNITED STATES”. Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law. Vol. V(III): 298-312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. United Nations. “United Nations Principles for Older Persons”. Human Rights Instruments. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. United Nations. “Implementation of the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing, 2002, in Asia and the Pacific: a summary of the outcomes of stakeholder consultation”. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Mital, K. “Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act: An Inadequate Care Regime”. Law School Policy Review. 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Rau, J, “What Long-Term Care Looks Like Around the World”. KFF Health News. 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Supreme Court of India. “Eviction is a Discretionary Remedy under the Senior Citizens Act: A Clarification from the Supreme Court”. Casemine. 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.