A Critical Review of Board Diversity and Corporate Financial Sustainability: Synthesizing Evidence from Global Markets

This article critically reviews literature on the relationship between board diversity and corporate financial sustainability (CFS) in global markets. A systematic search of the Scopus database resulted in 119 peer-reviewed articles published between 2020 and 2025. The review develops a comprehensive conceptual framework consisting of five independent variables (board gender diversity, board cultural diversity, board independence, board skills, and board tenure), three mediators (ESG performance, carbon emissions performance, and sustainability reporting), three moderators (firm size, industry sensitivity, and national culture), and four control variables (firm leverage, profitability, ownership structure, and firm age). The synthesis shows that while board diversity generally has a positive effect on CFS through improved ESG outcomes, this relationship depends on reaching a critical mass of female directors and is significantly influenced by contextual factors. The review critically assesses the main theoretical foundations, agency, resource dependence, stakeholder, and critical mass theories, and highlights ongoing methodological limitations, especially the predominance of quantitative archival research that treats boardroom dynamics as a black box. The findings suggest that translating diversity into better financial sustainability is neither automatic nor consistent, but rather relies on a complex interaction between internal governance structures and external institutional environments. The article concludes by proposing a future research agenda that emphasizes methodological diversification, the investigation of intersecting dimensions of diversity, and an increased focus on under-researched geographical regions.

Board Diversity, Critical Literature Review

1. Abdelkader, M. G., Gao, Y., & Elamer, A. A. (2024). Board gender diversity and ESG performance: The mediating role of temporal orientation in South Africa context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 440(140728). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140728 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abed, A., Al-Najjar, B., & Salama, A. (2025). Breaking down barriers: How board composition drives sustainability in GCC countries. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 36(4), 513–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2025.2452971 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Agnese, P., Arduino, F. R., Bruno, E., & Vento, G. A. (2024). On the road to sustainability: The role of board characteristics in driving ESG performance in Africa. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 95(101994). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101994 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Agustina, R. P., & Barokah, Z. (2024). Women on boards and ESG performance: Empirical evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia and Malaysia. Corporate Governance, 24(3), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-2023-0415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Aladwan, M., Samara, H., Alsinglawi, O., Elamer, A. A., & Moustafa, M. W. (2025). Do women on boards drive corporate sustainability? Evidence from the European Union. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(6), 8144–8160. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Alahdal, W. M., Hashim, H. A., Almaqtari, F. A., Salleh, Z., & Pandey, D. K. (2024). The moderating role of board gender diversity in ESG and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Gulf countries. Business Strategy & Development, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Alawadi, A., Kakabadse, N., Khan, N., & Bodolica, V. (2025). Institutional context matters: Board diversity and ESG outcomes in the UAE. Corporate Governance, 25(6), 1324–1341. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-03-2024-0135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Alawadi, A., Kakabadse, N., Morley, M., & Khan, N. (2024). Diversified boards and the achievement of environmental, social, and governance goals. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 33(3), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12606 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Aljammaz, A. A., Ramakrishnan, S., Sulimany, H. G. H., F.A. Khatib, S., Ali, A., Almoataz, E., & Alharbi, A. A. (2025). Mediating role of financial sustainability between board diversity and firms’ resilience: Evidence from Saudi listed firms. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06195-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Alkurdi, A., Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. A. (2024). The mediating role of carbon emissions in the relationship between the board attributes and ESG performance: European evidence. EuroMed Journal of Business, 19(4), 1016–1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/emjb-08-2022-0144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Al-Sarraf, J., Al-Swidi, A. K., & Al-Hakimi, M. A. (2025). Board diversity matters: Assessing ESG performance through the lens of firm size. Corporate Governance, 25(7), 1809–1833. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-11-2023-0495 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Amin, M. H., Ali, H., & Mohamed, E. K. A. (2025). Does industry sensitivity affect the relationship between board diversity and ESG performance? Fresh evidence from the G-7 countries. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 26(3), 732–755. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-11-2023-0364 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Arhinful, R., Mensah, L., & Owusu-Sarfo, J. S. (2024). Board governance and ESG performance in Tokyo stock exchange-listed automobile companies: An empirical analysis. Asia Pacific Management Review, 29(4), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2024.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Arora, A., & Sharma, D. (2022). Do environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance scores reduce the cost of debt? Evidence from Indian firms. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 16(5), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v16i5.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Aziz, A., Abdul Latiff, N. H., Osman, A. R., & Alshdaifat, M. N. H. (2025). The interaction effect of family ownership, board gender and skills on CSR strategy with ESG performance: Evidence from ASEAN-5 countries. Corporate Governance, 25(4), 948–961. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2024-0113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Baharom, Z. (2025). How ESG reporting is transforming corporate financial reporting: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(XIV), 1970–1977. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.914mg00148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Bel-Oms, I., Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2025). Do CEO attributes in the energy sector matter in sustainability performance? The moderating role performed by board gender diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(3), 3997–4018. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Bukari, A., Agyemang, A. O., & Bawuah, B. (2024). Assessing the moderating role of ESG performance on corporate governance and firm value in developing countries. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2333941 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Cambrea, D. R., Paolone, F., & Cucari, N. (2023). Advisory or monitoring role in ESG scenario: Which women directors are more influential in the Italian context? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4299–4314. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3366 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Chen, J., Qiu, Y., Ding, Q., & Geng, Y. (2025). Climate transition risk and corporate environment, social and governance performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 30(3), 2829–2848. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Cosma, S., Principale, S., & Venturelli, A. (2022). Sustainable governance and climate-change disclosure in European banking: The role of the corporate social responsibility committee. Corporate Governance, 22(6), 1345–1369. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-09-2021-0331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Fan, P., Qian, X., & Wang, J. (2023). Does gender diversity matter? Female directors and firm carbon emissions in Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77(101931). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101931 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Fathoni, A. F., Hanafi, M. M., & Tandelilin, E. (2025). Women on boards and sustainability performance: The moderating roles of national culture-international evidence from the banking sector. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2517245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gidage, M., & Bhide, S. (2025). Impact of ESG performance on financial risk in energy firms: Evidence from developing countries. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 19(4), 913–939. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijesm-05-2024-0021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Grassa, R., Elhout, R., Rafeea, R., Hassan, O. Y., & Humaid Al Suwaidi, S. (2025). Sustainable development goals: Investigation of the driving forces underlying the narratives in integrated reports. Society and Business Review, 20(3), 566–591. https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-08-2024-0283 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Grau Grau, A., Bel-Oms, I., & Núñez-Almonte, J. (2025). Board structure and ESG performance: The moderating role of country‐level gender parity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(6), 7254–7275. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Gull, A. A., Haq, I. U., Ghafoor, A., Ahsan, T., & Bayraktar, Y. (2025). When do female directors curb corporate ESG controversies? Evidence from the USA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 528(146746). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146746 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hasan, A., Hussainey, K., & Aly, D. (2022). Determinants of sustainability reporting decision: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(1), 214–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1964813 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hipólito, R., Borges, M. F. R., Tavares, M. C., Vale, J., Azevedo, G., & Oliveira, J. (2025). Determinants of environmental, social, and governance measures: Evidence from European insurance companies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(5), 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hossain, M. S., Ling, C. C., Pathiranage, N. W., & Fung, C. Y. (2025). Do female directors matter? Exploring the link between corporate sustainability disclosures and earnings management in Malaysia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(3), 3150–3166. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Islam, R., French, E., & Ali, M. (2022). Evaluating board diversity and its importance in the environmental and social performance of organizations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1134–1145. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2259 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Issa, A., & Hanaysha, J. R. (2023). Breaking the glass ceiling for a sustainable future: The power of women on corporate boards in reducing ESG controversies. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 31(4), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-03-2023-0053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Kampoowale, I., Kateb, I., Salleh, Z., & Alahdal, W. M. (2025). Board gender diversity and ESG performance: Pathways to financial success in Malaysian emerging market. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 20(11), 4666–4688. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-03-2024-0488 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Khatri, I. (2023). Board gender diversity and sustainability performance: Nordic evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 1495–1507. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Lewellyn, K., & Muller-Kahle, M. (2024). ESG leaders or laggards? A configurational analysis of ESG performance. Business and Society, 63(5), 1149–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503231182688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Makhija, H., Raghukumari, P. S., & Sethiya, A. (2025). Does board gender diversity moderate the impact of ESG on firms’ economic value added? Evidence from an emerging economy. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 74(3), 819–840. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-12-2023-0664 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Méndez, C., Arrondo, R., & Fonseca-Díaz, A. R. (2025). Sustainability practices, board’s gender diversity and quota regulations in European markets. Review of Managerial Science, 19(10), 3177–3227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00846-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Moussa, A. S., & Elmarzouky, M. (2023). Does capital expenditure matter for ESG disclosure? A UK perspective. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(10), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16100429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Najaf, K., Kee, H. W., Singh, J., Gultom, N. D., & Chin, A. (2025). Board characteristics and ESG performance: An evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 15(1), 105–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2024.2401360 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Nguyen, D. T., Hoang, T. G., Phi, N. T. M., & Truong, T. H. H. (2023). Do ESG ratings mediate the relationship between board gender diversity and firm financial performance? Evidence from the U. S. Market. Economics and Finance Letters, 10(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.18488/29.v10i2.3396 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Odriozola, M. D., Blanco-González, A., & Baraibar-Diez, E. (2024). The link of ESG performance and board gender diversity in European firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31, 5656–5669. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2881 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Pandey, A., & Chaturvedi Sharma, P. (2025). Boardroom dynamics in Indian private banks: How nonexecutive and women directors affect financial performance. Corporate Governance, 25(5), 1036–1054. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-01-2024-0002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Paolone, F., Pozzoli, M., Chhabra, M., & Di Vaio, A. (2024). Cultural and gender diversity for ESG performance towards knowledge sharing: Empirical evidence from European banks. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(11), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-05-2023-0445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Piñeiro-Chousa, J., López-Pérez, M. L., López-Cabarcos, M. Á., & Šević, A. (2025). Busy boards and environmental, social and governance performance: A gender perspective on NASDAQ-100 firms. Review of Managerial Science, 19(12), 3663–3686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00863-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Primacintya, V. A., & Kusuma, I. W. (2025). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and earnings management: The role of gender diversity. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 10(3), 294–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajar-12-2023-0414 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Putri, N. E., Juanda, A., & Wicaksono, A. P. N. (2025). The role of the board of directors’ gender diversity moderation in the relationship between carbon emissions and ESG performance. Corporate Board Role Duties and Composition, 21(4), 56. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv21i4art5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Qureshi, M. A., Ahsan, T., Gull, A. A., & Umar, Z. (2024). The impact of economic policy uncertainty on sustainability (ESG) performance: The role of the firm life cycle. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 20(4), 872–891. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-04-2022-0158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Rahi, A. F. (2025). Unpacking women’s power on corporate boards: gender reward in board composition. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 22(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00228-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Samsudin, Z. A., Ariff, A. M., Kamarudin, K. A., & Abdullah, A. A. (2025). Board gender diversity, audit committee independence and environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. International Journal of Business and Society, 26(3), 1100–1123. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.8928.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Sandretto, D., Rizzi, A., & Esposito, G. (2025). Gender diversity leadership and ESG performance: The influence of women on boards and in management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(4), 5075–5094. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Shakil, M. H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72(102144). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Słomka-Gołębiowska, A., De Masi, S., Zambelli, S., & Paci, A. (2023). Towards higher sustainability: If you want something done, ask a chairwoman. Finance Research Letters, 58(104308). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Vitale, G., Cupertino, S., Schiuma, G., & Troise, C. (2025). Investigating how mandatory sustainability reporting influences corporate governance effects on ESG performance: From obligation to impact for sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(5), 6261–6282. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Yadav, P., & Prashar, A. (2023). Board gender diversity: Implications for environment, social, and governance (ESG) performance of Indian firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(9), 2654–2673. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-12-2021-0689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Yulianti, E., & Waworuntu, S. R. (2025). The effect of company size, profitability, leverage, media exposure, and liquidity on carbon emissions disclosure. Annals of Data Science, 12(4), 1285–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-024-00564-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Zhang, C., Tian, X., Sun, X., Xu, J., & Gao, Y. (2024). Digital Transformation, Board Diversity and Corporate Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 16(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177788 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Zhu, N., Abdullah, Hashmi, M. A., Shah, M. H., & Yang, J. (2024). ESG performance and the cost of debt of Chinese firms: Do board idiosyncrasies matter? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(2), 9684–9714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02255-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Zhu, Y., & Chen, J. (2025). How does board gender diversity shape ESG performance? Finance Research Letters, 74(106717). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106717 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors