The Use of Humor in Da’wah: A Study Based on the Qur’an

Authors

Saifulazry Mokhtar

The Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning (PPIB), Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Irma Wani Othman

The Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning (PPIB), Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Romzi Ationg

The Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning (PPIB), Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Aisah Ahmad

Fakulti Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Kasoma Thia

SMK Tebobon, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Ku Hasnan Ku Halim

Pusat Pengajian Umum dan Kokurikulum, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300588

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 8119-8131

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-19

Accepted: 2026-03-26

Published: 2026-04-21

Abstract

This study examines the concept and use of Humor in Islamic da’wah from the perspective of the Qur’an, focusing on the biography of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), the practices of the Companions, and the distinction between permissible and impermissible Humor according to the principles of Shariah. Islam recognizes Humor as part of human nature and as an effective means of communication, provided it is grounded in truth, good character, and wisdom. Through qualitative analysis of Qur’anic verses, hadith, the Prophet’s biography, the views of classical and contemporary scholars, and literature on da’wah communication, the study finds that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) used Humor moderately as a medium of education, a psychological approach, and a da’wah strategy, without involving lies, insults, or negligence. The Companions also emulated this approach by maintaining a balance between religious seriousness and cheerfulness in social interactions. The findings indicate that permissible Humor in da’wah includes light jokes, educational analogies, and subtle, creative forms of constructive criticism that do not offend others. This type of Humor is effective in attracting the audience’s attention, enhancing understanding of the message, strengthening moral and ethical values, and reducing the communication gap between preachers and society, especially in digital media contexts such as religious lectures, da’wah cartoons, short videos, and social media content. In contrast, impermissible Humor includes harsh mockery, insults, slander, exposing others’ faults, and Humor that promotes immorality and division, as these contradict Islamic ethics and may undermine the objectives of da’wah. The study also proposes a Qur’an-based Humor in Da’wah Model that encompasses the sources of Humor, delivery strategies, objectives of da’wah, and Shariah ethics as a practical guide for preachers. In conclusion, the study emphasizes that Humor in da’wah should be applied in a balanced (wasatiyyah) manner, guided by the Qur’an and Sunnah, and tailored to the audience’s context so that da’wah becomes more effective, relevant, and ethical without compromising the sanctity of the Islamic message.

Keywords

Humor in da’wah; Qur’an-based da’wah

Downloads

References

1. Abdul-Raof, H. (2006). Arabic rhetoric: A pragmatic analysis. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abu Bakar, A. H., & Hashim, M. (2018a). The effectiveness of humor as a communication strategy in Islamic preaching. Journal of Islamic Communication, 7(2), 75-90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abu Bakar, M. A., & Hashim, R. (2018b). “Penggunaan Humor dalam Dakwah Kontemporari: Analisis dari Perspektif Islam.” Jurnal Dakwah dan Pengurusan Islam, 15(2), 45-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Abu Dawud, S. (n.d.). Sunan Abi Dawud. Beirut: Dar al-Risalah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ahmad, N., & Rosli, S. (2017). Humor dalam penyampaian ceramah: Kajian keberkesanan terhadap audiens. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 10(1), 12-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ahmad, R., & Rosli, A. R. (2017). Humor in Islamic lectures: Enhancing audience engagement and message retention. Journal of Islamic Studies and Communication, 14(1), 45-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ahmad, R., & Rosli, N. (2017). The effectiveness of humor in Islamic lectures. International Journal of Islamic Studies, 9(2), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Al-Bukhari, M. I. (n.d.). Sahih al-Bukhari. Beirut: Dar Ibn Kathir. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Al-Ghazali, A. H. (1995). The Alchemy of Happiness. Tehran: Islamic Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Al-Ghazali, A. H. (2004). Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din (Jilid 3). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Al-Ghazali, A. H. (2005). Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din (Vols. 1–4). Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Al-Ghazali. (1995). Ihya’ ‘ulum al-din (Revival of the religious sciences). Dar al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ali, A., & Hassan, S. (2019). The role of social media in contemporary Islamic da‘wah. Journal of Islamic Communication, 5(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Al-Nawawi, Y. S. (2001). Riyadh al-Salihin. Beirut: Dar al-Minhaj. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Al-Qadi ‘Iyad. (2002). Al-Shifa bi Ta‘rif Huquq al-Mustafa. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1996). Fiqh al-da‘wah. Cairo: Maktabah Wahbah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Al-Tirmizi, M. I. (n.d.). Sunan al-Tirmizi. Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Banas, J. A., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S. J. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60(1), 115–144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Bergson, H. (1900). Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Paris: Félix Alcan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Freud, S. (1905). Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. Vienna: Franz Deuticke. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hafifi H. Horace dan Musirin Mosin. (2021). Kaedah Humor dalam Pengajaran oleh Guru Bahasa Melayu di Sekolah Rendah : Satu Kajian Fenomenologi. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH) Volume 6, Issue 7, July 2021. 63-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Horace, S., & Mosin, F. (2021). Kaedah humor dalam pengajaran guru Bahasa Melayu di Sekolah Rendah: Satu kajian kualitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 8(1), 23-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ibn al-Jawzi, A. R. (2001). Talbis Iblis. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ibn Kathir, I. (2000). Tafsir al-Qur’an al-‘Azim. Riyadh: Dar Tayyibah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ibn Kathir, I. U. (2003). Al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ismail, M. F. (2019a). Humor in Islamic communication: A critical review. Islamic Studies Journal, 32(1), 50-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ismail, M. F. (2019b). Humor dalam Al-Quran: Kajian konseptual dan aplikasinya dalam dakwah moden. Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat, 6(1), 55-72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kant, I. (1790). Critique of Judgment. Berlin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Martin, R. A. (2007). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310–331. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Mokhtar, S. (2014). Strategi Pelaksanaan Dakwah Jabatan Hal Ehwal Agama Islam Negeri Sabah (JHEAINS) dan Penilaian Modul Kerohanian di Penjara Sandakan. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. Fakulti Pengajian Islam, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mokhtar, S., Ahmad Shukri, J. A., Norudin, M. H., Rahmat, S. N., Thia, K. & Jupiter, H. (2026c). Analysis of Dakwah Approaches in the “Dekat Di Hati Anak Malaysia” Program at Kampung Pahu Sarayo, Ranau, Sabah. , 10(3), 799-813. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Mokhtar, S., Japkin, S., Thia, K., Mohd Talib, M. N., Abdullah, M. A., Lebai Ahmad, M. K. (2026a). Language Approaches in Da’wah: A Review from an Islamic Perspective. 10(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Mokhtar, S., Othman, I. W., Ationg, R., & Esa, M. S. (2021a). Implementasi Dakwah Terhadap Etnik Sungai Di Sabah: Satu Analisis Awal. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development (JISED), 6(40), 164 - 178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Mokhtar, S., Othman, I. W., Moharam, M. M., & Maidin, I. (2021c). Dakwah Bil Akhlak Kontemporari: Satu Pendekatan Dalam Konsep Keusahawanan Islam. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business (IJAFB), 6 (37), 111 - 123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Mokhtar, S., Othman, I. W., Thia, K., Abdullah, M. A., Mohd Talib, M. N., Japkin, S. (2026b). Prospects of the Islamic Communication Model in the Qur’an as a Theoretical Framework for Da'wah. 10(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Mokhtar, S., Thia, K., & Ramlie, H. (2019). Pendekatan Dakwah JHEAINS terhadap Banduan di Penjara Sandakan: Satu Tinjauan Awal. Jurnal al-Hikmah. 11(2). 68-87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Mokhtar, S., Thia, K., Esa, M. S., Ibrahim, M. A., Talib, M. N. M. (2023b). Peranan Media Digital Dalam Dakwah Kontemporari Bagi Membentuk Kesepaduan Nasional Masyarakat Di Malaysia. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 8 (31), 47-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Mokhtar, S., Thia, K., Jampadin, A., Ibrahim, M. A., Shukri, J. A. A. (2025). Rekayasa Dakwah Terhadap Masyarakat Suku Kaum Murut Di Sabah: Satu Analisis. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 10 (41), 210-227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Mokhtar, S., Thia, K., Othman, I. W., Mohd Mokhtar, R. A., Abd Rahim, S., & Zaini, M. S. (2023a). Dakwah Bi Al-Nafs: Pemangkin Penularan Virus Mazmumah Dalam Kepimpinan Kendiri. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development (JISED), 8 (53), 230 - 241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Mokhtar, S., Thia, K., Othman, I.W., & Moharam, M.M.H. (2021b). Prospek dan Cabaran Implementasi Dakwah dalam Media Kontemporari: Satu Analisis. Prosiding 5th International Conference on Teacher Learning and Development (ICTLD) 2021. 03 – 05 August 2021. 408-418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Monib, S. A., Yasim, M. A. A., Jamari, M. N. T., Nurodin, M. H., Sattar,A. A. A., Talib, M. N. M., & Mokhtar, S. (2025). Cabaran Dan Implementasi Dakwah Dalam Program Amali Dakwah IPDAS 2024 Di Beaufort, Sabah. International Journal of Modern Education, 7 (25), 895-910. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Muhammad, A. S. (2010). Islamic communication: Principles and practices in dawah. Islamic Studies Quarterly, 22(4), 142-160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Muhammad, S. (2010). Communication Techniques in Islamic Da‘wah. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Muslim, I. H. (n.d.). Sahih Muslim. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Nabi, R. L., Moyer-Gusé, E., & Byrne, S. (2007). All joking aside: A serious investigation into humor. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 29–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Noor, H. (2015). Cabaran penggunaan humor dalam dakwah: Perspektif etika dan syariah. Jurnal Dakwah Kontemporari, 4(2), 33-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Noor, N. M. (2015). The role of wisdom in Islamic preaching. Journal of Islamic Thought and Culture, 14(3), 30-45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Omar, M. N., & Rahman, A. S. (2020). Islamic memes as a modern approach in religious preaching. International Journal of Social Media and Religion, 5(1), 101-115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Omar, N., & Rahman, A. (2020). “Humor as a Tool in Religious Preaching: A Study of Its Impact on Youth Engagement.” International Journal of Islamic Studies, 12(1), 23-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Rahman, N. A. (2018). Pendekatan komunikasi dakwah dalam masyarakat moden. Jurnal Dakwah dan Pembangunan Insan, 5(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Schopenhauer, A. (1818). The World as Will and Representation. Leipzig. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Shukri, J. A. A., Matarsat, D. E. A., Nayai, M. I. M., Rahmat, S. N., Salleh, M. S., Talib, M. N. M., & Mokhtar, S. (2025a). Pendekatan Dakwah Dalam Program Amali Dakwah IPDAS Tahun 2022 -2024 Di Sabah. International Journal of Modern Education, 7 (25), 847-863. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Shukri, J. A. A., Zainal, A. N., Ismail, M. S., Talib, M. N. M., & Mokhtar, S. (2025b). Implementasi Dakwah Menerusi Program Dekat Di Hati ‘Anak Malaysia’ Di Kampung Mesilou Kundasang, Sabah: Satu Analisis. International Journal of Modern Education, 7 (25), 864-882. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Zulkiple, A. G., & Mohd Fauzi, H. (2014). Humor sebagai elemen komunikasi berkesan dalam dakwah. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 3(1), 23–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles