From Awareness to Action: Understanding Flood Risk Perception in Flood-Prone Communities of Malaysia

Malaysia is a country that frequently experiences natural disasters such as floods during the monsoon season, particularly along the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia, which has significantly affected local communities. This situation has influenced flood risk perception among communities in Terengganu, which is shaped by several variables, including knowledge, preparedness, and awareness. This study was conducted to examine the association between knowledge, preparedness, awareness, and flood risk perception among communities in Terengganu. A quantitative approach was employed in this study, involving descriptive analysis and chi-square tests on data collected through questionnaires. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 26.0. The analyses conducted included descriptive statistics and chi-square testing. The results show that all variables, knowledge, preparedness, awareness, and flood risk perception among communities in Terengganu were at a high level, with mean values ranging from 2.34 to 3.67. Furthermore, the chi-square test results reveal a strong and significant association between knowledge and flood risk perception, indicating a moderate relationship. This study highlights the importance of flood risk perception, as critical situations persist with the increasing number of flood victims in Terengganu. In conclusion, this research is expected to provide new insights and inspiration to readers and researchers in the field of flood disaster studies.

Awareness, Flood Risk Perception, Knowledge

1. Agrawal, N. (2018). Disaster perceptions. In natural disasters and risk management in Canada: An Introduction (pp. 193-217). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1283-3_5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andress, K. (2010). Healthcare facility preparedness. Cambridge University Press EBooks, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511841415.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Botzen, W. J. W., Aerts, J. C. J. H., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2009). Dependence of flood risk perceptions on socioeconomic and objective risk factors. Water Resources Research, 45(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009wr007743 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brown, V. (2014). Risk perception: It’s personal. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122, A276 - A279. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.122-A276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cisternas, P. C., Cifuentes, L. A., Bronfman, N. C., & Repetto, P. B. (2023). The influence of risk awareness and government trust on risk perception and preparedness for natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 44(2), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cohen, J. Y., Huguet, G., Vera, L., & Dardennes, R. (2017). Cognitive-behavioural therapies and motivational interviewing for methamphetamine use disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy, 5(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.47739/1030. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ferrer, R., & Klein, W. (2015). Risk perceptions and health behavior. Current opinion in psychology, 5, 85-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COPSYC.2015.03.012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hauke, E. (2019). Understanding the world today: The roles of knowledge and knowing in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(3), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1544122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Houston, D., Cheung, W., Basolo, V., Feldman, D., Matthew, R., Sanders, B. F., Karlin, B., Schubert, J. E., Goodrich, K. A., Contreras, S., & Luke, A. (2017). The influence of hazard maps and trust of flood controls on coastal flood spatial awareness and risk perception. Environment and Behavior, 51(4), 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517748711 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Heriaty Berutu, & Manik, Y. (2023). Pengetahuan dan sikap kesiapsiagaan masyarakat terhadap bencana tanah longsor di desa gunung tua kecamatan tanah pinem kabupaten dairi. Jurnal Ilmiah Keperawatan IMELDA, 9(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.52943/jikeperawatan.v9i1.1236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Huang, J., Cao, W., Wang, H., & Wang, Z. (2020). Affect path to flood protective coping behaviors using SEM based on a survey in Shenzhen, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 940. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kellens, W., Zaalberg, R., & De Maeyer, P. (2011). The informed society: An analysis of the public’s information-seeking behavior regarding coastal flood risks. Risk Analysis, 32(8), 31(7), 1369–1381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01743.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lin, S., & Opdyke, A. (2024). University student flood risk perceptions and flood probability knowledge in Greater Sydney. Natural Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06757-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ridolfi, E., Albrecht, F., and Baldassarre, G.D. (2020). Exploring the role of risk perception in influencing flood losses over time. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65 (1), 12–20. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/02626667.2019.1677907. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sales, R., & Rescia, A. J. (2024). Managing risk mitigation in urban expansion areas of Argentina’sِ Drylands:ِ Theِ gap between perception and environmental [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. behaviour. Land, 13(8), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081216 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5 (2), 207–232.Elsevier. doi:10.1016/0010- 0285(73)90033-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yatnikasari, S., Asnan, M. N., & Agustina, F. (2021). Kesiapsiagaan rumah tangga terhadap bencana banjir di kelurahan Gunung Lingai kecamatan Sungai Pinang, Kota Samarinda. 4(1) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Yesil T.,ِ S.,ِ Dedeoğlu,ِ N.,ِ Braun-Fahrlaender, C., & Tanner, M. (2011). Earthquake awareness and perception of risk among the residents of Istanbul. Natural Hazards, 59(1), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9764-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Yildiz,ِ A.,ِ Teeuw,ِ R.,ِ Dickinson,ِ J.,ِ &ِ Roberts,ِ J.ِ (2020).ِ Children’sِ earthquake preparedness and risk perception: A comparative study of two cities in Turkey, using a modified PRISM approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 49, 101666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101666 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Yusoff, I. M., Ramli, A., Alkasirah, N. A. M., & Nasir, N. M. (2018). Exploring the managing of flood disaster: A Malaysian perspective. Geografia, 14(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria