Assessment of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Recycling Practices in Keffi Metropolis, Nasarawa, Nigeria

Authors

Peter Bolaji Oladeji

Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Environmental Design and Management, Lead City University, Ibadan (Nigeria)

Benjamin Lungu BARKA

City University, Ibadan (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300617

Subject Category: Environment

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 8658-8668

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-26

Accepted: 2026-03-31

Published: 2026-04-22

Abstract

The research paper focuses on assessment of recycling PET activity in the city of Keffi Metropolis, the state of Nasarawa with the purpose to develop a more sustainable and friendly waste management model. A survey design of quantitative descriptive study was used that utilised 399 respondents chosen through stratified and simple random sampling methods. The data were collected via structured questionnaires and analysed descriptively using statistical analysis as well as thematically. The results show that the consumption rate of PET bottles is high in Keffi with little formal recycling systems. The waste management of PET is organised mostly through informal sources, which include waste pickers, small scale pickers, and household level reuse of the waste to local beverages. Over half of the participants were found to have limited knowledge of official techniques of PET recovery, and recycling operations in general are still mostly unorganised. Even though 44.7% of the respondents attributed the economic value of PET collection and resale, 55.3% indicated that they were not directly involved when it comes to recycling, highlighting the imbalanced presence in the value chain of recycling. Spatial inequalities on the waste management infrastructure also led to indiscriminate dumping and burning especially in the peripheral neighbourhoods. However, inadequate infrastructure, lack of awareness by people, coordination of policies and formalisation of the integration process of the PET recycling hinder the overall benefits of PET recycling. In conclusion, the PET waste management improvement in Keffi requires the development of the formal collection system, unification and formalisation of informal recyclers, the increase of the public awareness campaign, and the support of the policy that aligns with the principles of the circular economy. The solution to these shortcomings will allow Keffi to streamline towards a more inclusive, efficient, and sustainable process of PET recycling.

Keywords

Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) ,Recycling ,Practices, Keffi Metropolis, Nasarawa

Downloads

References

1. J. R. Sadler, Food, Beverage, and Packaging Technology (Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2018), 112–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. M. A. Al-Sabagh et al., “Greener routes for recycling of polyethylene terephthalate,” Egyptian Journal of Petroleum 25, no. 1 (2016): 53–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. S. P. McKeen, “Plastics for Beverage Packaging,” in The Effect of Sterilization on Plastics and Elastomers, 3rd ed. (Oxford: William Andrew Publishing, 2022), citing data from PubMed Central (PMC). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Africa Waste Management Outlook (Nairobi: UNEP, 2018). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. World Bank, What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2018). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Jambeck, J. R., et al., “Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean,” Science 347, no. 6223 (2015): 768–771. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. O. O. Afon, “Solid waste management in Nigerian cities: Challenges and opportunities,” Waste Management & Research 35, no. 4 (2017): 355–365. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Environmental Statistics Report (Abuja: NBS, 2020). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Plastics Industry Association of Nigeria (PLAN), Plastic Waste and Recycling in Nigeria (Lagos: PLAN, 2021). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hopewell, J., R. Dvorak, and E. Kosior, “Plastics recycling: challenges and opportunities,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364, no. 1526 (2009): 2115–2126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ragaert, K., L. Delva, and K. Van Geem, “Mechanical and chemical recycling of solid plastic waste,” Waste Management 69 (2017): 24–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. A. A. Aderogba, “Challenges of plastic waste management in Lagos Metropolis,” Journal of Human Ecology 34, no. 2 (2011): 87–96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. A. O. Babayemi and K. T. Dauda, “Evaluation of solid waste generation, categories and disposal options in Ilorin, Nigeria,” Journal of Applied Sciences in Environmental Sanitation 4, no. 3 (2009): 189–194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. O. O. Ogwueleka, “Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Nigeria,” Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering 6, no. 3 (2009): 173–180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. S. O. Adeyemi, I. A. Olorunfemi, and O. A. Adewoye, “Waste scavenging in third world cities: A case study in Ilorin, Nigeria,” The Environmentalist 21, no. 2 (2001): 93–96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. A. C. Ogbonna and I. I. Aderibigbe, “Plastic recycling practices and prospects in Nigeria,” Nigerian Journal of Environmental Sciences 14, no. 1 (2020): 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. O. A. Ajayi and T. A. Oyedele, “Sustainable plastic waste recycling in Nigeria: Opportunities and constraints,” Journal of Cleaner Production 297 (2021): 126–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. National Population Commission (NPC), Population Distribution by Age and Sex: 2006 Census Priority Tables (Abuja: NPC, 2009). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nasarawa State Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management Report (Lafia: NSME, 2021). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. City Population, “Keffi Local Government Area Population Statistics,” 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. S. A. Eneh, “Urban waste management and environmental sustainability in Nasarawa State,” Journal of Environmental Policy and Development Studies 9, no. 1 (2021): 61–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles