Work Function of Metal Back Contact Surface Alloy Molybdenum (Mo) With Tungsten (W) For Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (Cigs) Thin Film Solar Cell: Simulation Using Scaps-1d And Density Functional Theory (Dft) Using Winmostar Quantum Espresso

The rapid growth in today’s electronic technology and usage leads to a high demand of electrical power consumptions. Researchers around the globe are continuing finding for renewable sources of energy to meet the increasing demands of energy. This is because the high fossil fuel and carbon consumptions contribute greatly on the emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases which have become the primary contributor of global climate change. Global temperatures have risen sharply over the last few decades and the atmospheric concentrations of CO2 continue to rise while the global emissions have not yet peaked [1]. Research and development of CIGS solar cells was started in 1980s as one of the various renewable sources of energy. CIGS thin film solar cells efficiency remains become an interesting topic among the researchers. University of Maine achieved 5.8% CIGS thin film solar cells efficiency in 1976. The efficiency has significantly improved since then to 23.6% in 2023 by Evolar/UU [3]. This study aims to improve the efficiency by focusing on the metal back contact of the CIGS thin film solar cells. The simulations were conducted using SCAPS-1D and Winmostar Quantum Espresso for quantum chemical, molecular dynamics and first-principles calculations simulation tools. Back contact layer of CIGS solar cell acts as an optical reflector to reflect light back to the absorber layer. Molybdenum (Mo) is commonly used as the back contact because it forms low resistivity ohmic contact to CIGS absorber layer and has high conductivity. Furthermore, its conductivity does not degrade during deposition of CIGS at high substrate temperature, and it does not react strongly, chemically, with CIGS absorber layer. However, work function property of Mo is within the range of 4.36 eV to 4.95 eV. There is a need to increase the work function property of the back contact to improve carrier collection near the back contact. The findings from the study offers a critical insight into factors that could further improve the CIGS solar cells efficiency.

Renewable energy; CIGS thin film solar cells; SCAPS-1D; Winmostar Quantum Espresso

1. R.K. Pachauri, L.A. Meyer (eds.), IPCC, 2014: Climate change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. H. Ritchie et. Al, 2020. CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Published online at OurWorldInData.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL. US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Takuya Kato et. Al, Record Efficiency for thin-film polycrystalline solar cells up to 22.9% achieved by Cs- Treated Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dongxiao Wang et.al , Tuning the Work Function of the Metal Back Contact toward Efficient Cu2ZnSnSe4 Solar cells, Solar RRL 2021, 5, 2000391, Nov 16, 2020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. David R. Lide, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 84th Edition, CRC Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. W. W. Coblentz, The Reflecting Power of Various Metals [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sanghyun Lee et al., Engineering of Effective back-contact barrier of CZTSe: Nanoscale Ge solar cells – MoSe2 defects implication, Solar Energy 194 (2019)114-120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Winmostar Quantum Espresso, X-Ability Co. Ltd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. [Materialsproject.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. M. F. Rahman et al., A qualitative Design and optimization of CIGS-based Solar Cells with Sn2S3 Back Surface Field: A plan for achieving 21.83% efficiency, Multidisciplinary, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. H. K. Park and W. Jo, Flexible Cu(In,Ga)Se2 photovoltaics for bending applications, Journal of Materials Chemistry C, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. S. Ramesh, Energy yield framework to simulate thin film CIGS solar technology performance, Scientific Reports, Nature Publishing Group, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. M. Fathi et al., Study of Thin Film Solar Cells in High Temperature Condition, Procedia Engineering, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. C. L. Chuang, M. W. Chang, N. P. Chen, C. C. Pan, and C. P. Liu, Improving Performance of CIGS Solar Cells by Annealing ITO Thin Films Electrodes, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. M. E. M. Soudagar, Effect of electron transport layer thickness and solar cell performance in CIGS devices, Solar Energy, Elsevier, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. A. Elmelouky, In-depth study of CIGS layer properties with silicon layer impact for solar cell enhancement, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, Elsevier, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. N. Khoshsirat et al., Numerical simulation of CIGS thin film solar cells using SCAPS-1D, Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. M. Izaki et al., Finding a way to boost efficiency of CIGS solar cells, Progress in Photovoltaics, Wiley, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Jackson P., Hariskos D., Lotter E., Paetel S., Wuerz R., Menner R., Wischmann W., Powalla M., New world record efficiency for Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells beyond 20%, Prog. Photovoltaics: Res. Appl., Volume 19, 2011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Biodegradable Materials and Renewable Materials Innovation with Eggshell Powder in Sustainable Product Design