Utilization of Developer's Corporate Real Estate Resources for Agricultural Production Contributing to National Food Security: A Conceptual Study

This study aims to develop a conceptual idea for the temporary utilization of developers' corporate real estate resources, particularly land banking assets, to support agricultural production and enhance Malaysia's national food security. The critical challenge addressed is the rapid urbanization and speculative land banking practices that have reduced available arable land, increased reliance on food imports, and disrupted local food production systems. Recognizing the underutilized potential of developer-owned land banks, this study proposes strategic repurposing for fast-yield agricultural activities without compromising future real estate development plans. This study adopts a literature-based approach, drawing from scholarly articles, policy frameworks, and case studies related to land use, urban agriculture, and food security. Content analysis of existing literature identifies key perimeters influencing land utilization for agriculture. Through thematic analysis, the study identifies critical factors that influence the practicality of temporary agricultural activities on corporate land. This method allows for a comprehensive understanding of existing gaps and opportunities within the current development and planning landscape. The expected outcome is a conceptual idea that offers policymakers and developers a practical roadmap to temporarily leverage corporate land resources for agricultural use, contributing to sustainable urban development, enhanced food security, and socio-economic resilience. In addition, it aims to provide an initial conceptual direction that can inform future research, policy formulation, and private sector involvement in adaptive land use for food security. The findings provide both theoretical enrichment in the field of sustainable land management and practical strategies for balancing urban growth with agricultural sustainability in Malaysia.

Corporate land banking, urban agriculture, food security, land use policy, sustainable development.

1. Adair, A., Berry, J., Haran, M., Lloyd, G., & McGreal, S. (2020). The global financial crisis and real estate: Evidence from UK. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 13(1), 59–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-02-2019-0015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alexander, E. R. (2011). A transaction–cost theory of land use planning and development control: Towards the institutional analysis of public planning. Town Planning Review, 82(5), 517–544. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2011.31 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barakabitze, A. A., Fue, Z., & Sanga, C. (2017). The use of smart farming technology in agriculture. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(7), 185–190. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://doi.org/10.26483/ijarcs.v8i7.4422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chapple, K., Wexler, M., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2013). Temporary urbanism: Activating vacant land. Cities, 35, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.05.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Economic Planning Unit (EPU). (2021). Twelfth Malaysia Plan (RMK-12). Putrajaya: Prime Minister’s Department. https://www.epu.gov.my [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Evans, A. W. (2004). Economics, real estate and the supply of land. Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2021). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2021. Rome: FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4474en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gyourko, J., & Krimmel, J. (2021). The impact of land use regulation on housing and land markets. Annual Review of Economics, 13, 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-092420-121849 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hashim, H., & Roslan, A. H. (2019). Urban food security and resilience in Malaysia. Journal of Urban Management, 8(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.05.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hassan, M., & Hossain, M. I. (2020). Food insecurity and the COVID-19 pandemic: A global perspective. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 8(4), 345–351. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. https://doi.org/10.35495/ajab.2020.03.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hu, X., Huang, J., & Hou, L. (2019). Precision agriculture in Asia: Current status and prospects. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 162, 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.04.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lieder, M., & Schröter-Schlaack, C. (2021). Digital farming technologies and sustainability: A systems perspective. Sustainability, 13(2), 865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020865 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Louw, E. (2008). Land assembly for urban transformation: The case of the Netherlands. Land Use Policy, 25(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.05.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mbabazi, E., Lwasa, S., & Simon, D. (2021). Urban land governance and sustainable development: Evidence from African cities. Cities, 108, 102957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102957 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Monkkonen, P., & Ronconi, L. (2013). Land use regulations, compliance and enforcement in developing countries: Theory and evidence. World Development, 54, 222–236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.08.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rahman, S., & Sarker, J. R. (2022). Land fragmentation, technology adoption, and productivity in Southeast Asia. Agricultural Systems, 195, 103294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103294 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Shaharudin, M. I., Tan, L. F., & Othman, A. (2020). Agricultural innovation in Malaysia: Trends and policy perspectives. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 17(2), 123–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. https://doi.org/10.37801/ajad2020.17.2.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Singh, S., King, R., & Harrington, L. (2019). Agritech, food security, and land governance: A review. Land Use Policy, 81, 837–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tey, Y. S., Mad Nasir, S., & Shamsudin, M. N. (2009). Demand for rice in Malaysia and the impacts of price support. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(2), 123–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijar.2009.123.130 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Walter, A., Finger, R., Huber, R., & Buchmann, N. (2017). Smart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(24), 6148–6150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707462114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Zhang, Y., Zhao, L., & Wang, M. (2020). Strategic land banking and urban spatial structure. Urban Studies, 57(12), 2456–2473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019858214 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Analysis of Housing Deficit in Urban Cities: A Case Study of Port Harcourt
• Selection Factors for Security Service Companies in Strata Schemes in Malaysia
• Greed, Grievance, and Guns: A Resource-Driven Conflict in Zimbabwe's Mining Communities - A Case Study of Marange Diamond Mines
• Public Acceptance of Durian Farmland Real Estate Investment Via Crowdfunding in Malaysia
• Students’ Perceptions on Value-Added the Islamic Estate Planning Course in Real Estate Education