A Comparative Analysis of Cesarean Section Prevalence and Associated Feto-Maternal Outcomes between Booked and Unbooked Patients at the Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital: A 5-Year Retrospective Study

Background: Antenatal care (ANC) booking status is a vital indicator of maternal healthcare engagement and is widely considered to significantly influence delivery outcomes. In low-resource settings like Nigeria, understanding how booking status influences cesarean section (CS) rates and associated feto-maternal morbidity and mortality is essential for designing effective public health strategies and hospital-level interventions.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the prevalence of cesarean section and associated fetomaternal outcomes between booked and unbooked patients who had childbirth at the Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital (EKSUTH) over a five-year period.
Methods: For this research, a retrospective analysis of 5,650 delivery records from April 2020 to March 2025 was conducted. Patients were classified as "booked" if they had at least two scheduled ANC visits at EKSUTH or "unbooked" if they had no prior ANC at EKSUTH. Data extracted included the mode of delivery (Spontaneous vaginal delivery or Cesarean section), maternal outcomes (Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage and mortality), and neonatal outcomes (APGAR scores and stillbirths). Statistical analyses included independent-samples t-tests and chi-square tests; p-values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results: The overall prevalence of CS was 47.36% (2,676/5,650). Unbooked patients had a slightly higher CS rate (46.50%) than their booked counterparts (45.85%). Maternal mortality (p=0.802) and the incidence of Primary PPH (p=0.602) did not significantly differ statistically across both groups. On the other hand, unbooked patients had considerably poorer neonatal outcomes. The mean APGAR scores at one minute (6.19 ± 2.46 vs. 7.30 ± 1.33, p<0.0001) and five minutes (7.67 ± 2.77 vs. 8.83 ± 1.33, p<0.0001), for their newborns were considerably lower. Similarly, the group also had a significantly higher stillbirth rate (9.53% vs. 1.32%, p<0.0001).
Conclusion: While the CS rate at EKSUTH is high overall and slightly elevated among unbooked patients, the most critical finding is the severe disparity in neonatal outcomes. The most significant finding is the stark difference in neonatal outcomes, despite the high overall CS incidence at EKSUTH and a somewhat higher rate among unbooked patients. Poorer immediate newborn viability and much greater risks of stillbirth are closely linked to a lack of organized antenatal care. These results highlight the critical role of early and frequent antenatal booking as a key strategy for increasing neonatal survival, and the urgent need for focused initiatives to close this care gap.

Cesarean Section, Antenatal Care, Booked

1. Angolile CM, Max BL, Mushemba J, Mashauri HL. Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action. Health science reports. 2023 May;6(5):e1274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Shalaby MA, Maged AM, Al-Asmar A, El Mahy M, Al-Mohamady M, Rund NM. Safety and efficacy of preoperative tranexamic acid in reducing intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in high-risk women undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2022 Mar 14;22(1):201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adepoju VA, Abdulrahim A, Adnani QE. A systematic review of Government-Led free caesarean section policies in low- and middle-income countries from 2009 to 2025. InHealthcare 2025 Oct 4 (Vol. 13, No. 19, p. 2522). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Pham HT, Le TQ, Tran NH. Benchmarking Cesarean Section Trends: A Case Study from Tu Du Hospital Using Robson’s Model. InHealthcare 2025 Aug 21 (Vol. 13, No. 16, p. 2070). MDPI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ojo TT, Adeaga O, Gbokan T. Caesarean section: prevalence, determinants, and socio-cultural influences on decision-making. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences. 2025;6:67-93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Rahman R. Literature Survey on Factors Influencing the Cesarean Section (CS) Delivery in Bangladesh: Evidence from Global. 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Oguejiofor CB, Okafor LU, Eleje GU, Okafor CG, Ezeigwe CJ. Outcomes in Unbooked Pregnancies Managed in a Tertiary Hospital in Nnewi, Nigeria. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Mother Health 1 (1), 01. 2023;6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Adenaya OR, Ibrahim AM, Ojo OO, Grillo EO, Ade-Onojobi AO, Odelola OI. Comparative Study of the Obstetric Outcome between Booked and Unbooked Mothers at the Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta: A Two-Year Review. Western Journal of Medical and Biomedical Sciences. 2022 Feb 13;3(1):59-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ghafoor M, Qureshi QI, Soomro S, Shah F, Mughis A, Maqsood Z. Feto-Maternal Outcomes of Labouring Patients in Booked and Unbooked Patients: Feto-Maternal Outcomes of Laboring Patients. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences. 2022 Nov 30:83-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Oguejiofor CB, Okafor LU, Eleje GU, Okafor CG, Ezeigwe CJ. Outcomes in Unbooked Pregnancies Managed in a Tertiary Hospital in Nnewi, Nigeria. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Mother Health 1 (1), 01. 2023;6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ugwu AO, Adebayo A, Adefemi AK. A Comparative Study of Fetal and Maternal Outcomes in Booked and Unbooked Mothers Delivering at a Tertiary Health Care Institute in Lagos: A Retrospective Cohort Study. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Zheng F, Wen H, Shi L, Wen C, Wang Q, Yao S. Incidence of postpartum hemorrhage based on the improved combined method in evaluating blood loss: A retrospective cohort study. PloS one. 2023 Jul 28;18(7):e0289271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. World Health Organization. Maternal mortality measurement: guidance to improve national reporting. World Health Organization; 2022 Jun 30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ago B. Obstetric outcome of booked and unbooked deliveries at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria. Qeios. 2022 Nov 17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Awoyesuku PA, Ohaka C, Chijioke S, Amadi DB, Ngeri B, Iwo-Amah RS. Maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies beyond 40 weeks of gestation at a tertiary care hospital in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Adenaya OR, Ibrahim AM, Ojo OO, Grillo EO, Ade-Onojobi AO, Odelola OI. Comparative Study of the Obstetric Outcome between Booked and Unbooked Mothers at the Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta: A Two-Year Review. Western Journal of Medical and Biomedical Sciences. 2022 Feb 13;3(1):59-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. McGready R, Mola GD, Rijken MA, Nosten FH, Mutabingwa T. Obstetrics in the Tropics. Manson’s Tropical Infectious Diseases. 2014 Jan 1:1177-96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Oguejiofor CB, Okafor LU, Eleje GU, Okafor CG, Ezeigwe CJ. Outcomes in Unbooked Pregnancies Managed in a Tertiary Hospital in Nnewi, Nigeria. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Mother Health 1 (1), 01. 2023;6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Oguejiofor CB, Okafor LU, Eleje GU, Okafor CG, Ezeigwe CJ. Outcomes in Unbooked Pregnancies Managed in a Tertiary Hospital in Nnewi, Nigeria. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Mother Health 1 (1), 01. 2023;6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kipkore SJ. Risk Factors, Indications and Outcomes of Post Cesarean Section Readmission at Knh: a Case-control Study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sethi N, Rajaratnam RK, Abdullah N. Caesarean Section on Maternal Request. InNew Aspects in Cesarean Sections 2023 Jan 11. IntechOpen. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gaikwad V, Bhadoriya A, Gaikwad S, Gaikwad SV. A comparative study of fetal and maternal outcomes in registered and unregistered antenatal cases in a tertiary care center. Cureus. 2024 Aug 3;16(8). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Khajotiya, S., Sharma, A., and Asha Yadav, H., 2025. A Study to Compare Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Antenatal Women Undergoing Elective and Emergency Caesarean Section at A Tertiary Care Center in North West Rajasthan. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 30, pp.60-66 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mansoor J, Hafeez U, Khan NU, Ali A, Zubair R, Swathi NL, Nadeem A, Mansoor F. Fetal and Neonatal Outcomes in Booked vs. UnBooked Deliveries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Global Literature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Aziz H, Ahmed RI, Ashfaq K, Javed I, Javed M, Ahmed N. Risk Factors of Birth Asphyxia in Neonate Born to Booked Vs Un-booked Mothers at SKBZ Muzaffarabad. Journal of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Pakistan. 2024 Jun 1;14(2):239-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Njie AE, Nyandiko WM, Ahoya PA, Moutchia JS. A comparative analysis of APGAR score and the gold standard in the diagnosis of birth asphyxia at a tertiary health facility in Kenya. PLoS One. 2023 May 24;18(5):e0285828. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Metwali NY, Ahmed RA, Timraz JH, Irfan H, Makarfi SM, Metwali MY, Orfali MT, Fadl JK, Fadl J. Evidence-Based strategies to minimize unnecessary primary Cesarean sections: A comprehensive review. Cureus. 2024 Nov 29;16(11). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Okojie OH, Ogboghodo EO, Omoijuanfo EA. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of booked and UN-booked pregnancies in Benin City, Southern Nigeria: a comparative study. Journal of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care. 2022 Aug 9;34(2):109-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. McCarthy F. Antenatal care. InObstetrics by Ten Teachers 2024 May 22 (pp. 15-28). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ogah PO, Uguru N, Okeke C, Mohammed N, Ogbe O, Ashiver WG, Aina M. Primary health care in Nigeria: best practices and quality of care in Nigeria. BMC Health Services Research. 2024 Aug 21;24(1):963. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Adenaya OR, Ibrahim AM, Ojo OO, Grillo EO, Ade-Onojobi AO, Odelola OI. Comparative Study of the Obstetric Outcome between Booked and Unbooked Mothers at the Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta: A Two-Year Review. Western Journal of Medical and Biomedical Sciences. 2022 Feb 13;3(1):59-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Statistics IS. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. Armonk. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Measuring Waste of Patient Time in Health Care at Non-Digitized Hospital: An Observational Study in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh
• Reaffirming Clinical Confidence in Atorvastatin Therapy: A Digital Outreach Case Study from Tamil Nadu, India
• Clinical Manifestations and Therapeutic Response in a Patient with Hypothyroidism: A Case Report
• Eranda (Ricinus Communis) In Gridhrasi (Sciatica): Classical Rationale, Pharmacology and Clinical Evidence- A Narrative Literature Review
• Magnetotherapy in Pain Management: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives – A Review