A Comparative Study in the Delivery of Ethics for Engineering Undergraduates

Authors

Ruslan Hassan, FASc

Department of Civil Engineering, IIUM, Jalan Gombak, 53110 Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800278

Subject Category: Information Technology

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 4180-4185

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-21

Accepted: 2026-08-26

Published: 2026-09-02

Abstract

Ethics has resulted from the human faculty of thinking and differs from akhlak, which is faith in action. Humility can be used as an indicator of good akhlak and is worthy of being used for defining the moral competence of engineers. Akhlak, after all, signifies morality and mannerism. This affective trait is to be converged with mastery, representing the cognitive domain. The two modes of delivery of ethics, humility, were then assessed through a mixed-method sequential exploratory research. Two groups of students were subjected to formal and informal teaching programs. Humility is used as the moderating effect of Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) of the Mastery-Humility model. It was found that the group comprising of 163 students (Group P) that underwent an informal delivery of ethics (humility) met the fit indices of the model. This is further confirmed by the Independent t-test. The other group comprising a similar number of students (Q), however, failed to do so despite having more ethics-related taught subjects. Several likely reasons for the teaching modules’ ineffectiveness are the necessity of passing ethics as an examination subject, perceived as a lesser value for students to become industry ready, and it being treated as a stand-alone subject.

Keywords

Social Science

Downloads

References

1. L. O. Wilson, The second principle. Retrieved on Sept. 28 2020, at https://thesecondprinciple.com/instructionAl-design/threedomainsoflearning/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. C.M. Veach,, There’s no such thing as engineering ethics. Journal of Leadership and Management in Engineering, Vol.6, Issue 3 Retrieved Aug. 17, 2006, https://ascelibrary.org/doi/full/10.1061/(ASCE)1532– 6748(2006)6%3A3(97) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. M.N. Omar, Ethics in Islam: A Critical Survey, Islammiyyat 32, 157-171, 2010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. J.P. Tangney,. Humility: Theoretical perspectives, empirical findings and directions for future research, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 70-82. 2000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. J.C. Elliott, Humility: Development and analysis of a scale. PhD diss., University of Tennessee. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/795, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. J.J. Exline. & A.L.Geyer, . Perceptions of humility: A preliminary study. Self and Identity, 3: 95-114. 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. R. Hassan, Developing a Convergent Mastery-Humility model for a Tawhidic-based Engineering Curriculum, [Unpublished PhD thesis], IIUM, 2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. S.A. Dayang. Effect of spiritual well-being on academic performance : A case study among students of the Faculty of Electrical Engineering, UiTM. (unpublished Master’s thesis). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia,2013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles