A Comprehensive Review of SDG 16: Research Progress and Implementation Gaps in Peace and Justice

The study assessed methods, implementation strategies, and outcomes in observational research on SDG 16, which promotes peace, justice, and strong institutions. Thirteen major studies published between 2019 and 2024 were systematically evaluated using the STROBE checklist’s 22 criteria to assess study design, data sources, variables, and biases. The included studies systematic reviews, mixed-methods, case studies, and policy analyses focused on developing and conflict-affected regions, examining implementation efficacy, barriers, and outcomes across core SDG 16 components. Findings showed that 60-70% of developing nations experience corruption and resource constraints, while only 40% demonstrate adequate justice metrics. In peacebuilding, 85% of stakeholders highlighted higher education’s role, with university programs improving community engagement by 70%. However, 75-80% of studies identified resource and institutional capacity as major challenges. EU nations reported 85% policy compliance versus 60% cultural barriers in Southeast Asia. Indigenous groups, excluded in 75% of cases, face severe participation gaps. Technology shows potential 80% of AI projects enhance monitoring, though 65% face data quality issues. Overall, SDG 16 implementation remains uneven; strong institutions drive progress, but persistent resource gaps, weak capacity, and exclusion demand context-specific strategies, inclusive governance, and coordinated international support.

SDG 16; Peace and Justice; Strong Institutions; Institutional Reform; Peace-building; Justice Systems; Development Goals; Policy Implementation; Systematic Review; Global Governance

1. Adelman, S., & Paliwala, A. (Eds.). (2020). The limits of law and development: Neoliberalism, governance and social justice. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alam, M. M., Aktar, M. A., Idris, N. D. M., & Al-Amin, A. Q. (2023). World energy economics and geopolitics amid COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 policy direction. World Development Sustainability, 2, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2023.100048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Armingeon, K., Sager, F., Mavrot, C., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2024). Switzerland Report: Sustainable Governance Indicators 2024. SGI, (2020). https://doi.org/10.11586/2022120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandari, R., Moallemi, E. A., Lester, R. E., Downie, D., & Bryan, B. A. (2022). Prioritising Sustainable Development Goals, characterising interactions, and identifying solutions for local sustainability. Environmental Science & Policy, 127, 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.09.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bernstein, S. (2017). The United Nations and the governance of sustainable development goals. Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation, 213-239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bhargava, V., Elmendorf, E., Gray, S., Kafka, B., Ritchie, D., & Little, S. (2019). Expanding civil society contributions to the governance agendas of the sustainable development goals and international financial institutions. Partnership for Transparency. Washington. https://ptfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Expanding-Civil-Society-Contributions-to-Good-Governance.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bose, S., & Kumar, A. (2021). Conflict-Affected Areas and Sustainable Development Goal 16. In Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions (pp. 120-130). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95960-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Breuer, A., Janetschek, H., & Malerba, D. (2019). Translating sustainable development goal (SDG) interdependencies into policy advice. Sustainability, 11(7), 2092. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cipriano, P. F., Blanchard, K. A., & Rosa, W. E. (2021). Preventing violence to achieve peaceful and inclusive societies. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 121(9), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000790652.74669.ec [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Crawford, G. (2023). Power and civic action: mobilisation for human rights in developing societies. In Research Handbook on the Politics of Human Rights Law (pp. 79-98). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789908831.00011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dang, H. A. H., Pullinger, J., Serajuddin, U., & Stacy, B. (2023). Statistical performance indicators and index—a new tool to measure country statistical capacity. Scientific Data, 10(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-01971-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dasandi, N., & Mikhaylov, S. J. (2019). AI for SDG 16 on peace, justice, and strong institutions: tracking progress and assessing impact. In Position Paper for the IJCAI Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 1-3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Davila, D., & Murillo, E. (2021). Capacity Development and Sustainable Development Goals. In Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions (pp. 43-52). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95960-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. bmj, 315(7109), 629-634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. ESCAP, U. (2023). The changing landscape of regional cooperation in Asia and the Pacific. https://www.unescap.org/kp/2023/changing-landscape-regional-cooperation-asia-and-pacific [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Estes, R. J. (2024). United Nations development programme. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 7355-7357). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_3097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gaglio, B., Shoup, J. A., & Glasgow, R. E. (2013). The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. American journal of public health, 103(6), e38–e46. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301299 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological indicators, 60, 565-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hambrey, J. (2017). The 2030 agenda and the sustainable development goals: the challenge for aquaculture development and management. FAO fisheries and aquaculture circular, (C1141). https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/2030-agenda-sustainable-development-goals/docview/1948408161/se-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Healey, P. (2017). Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space. In Connections (pp. 357-374). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315573458-27/transforming-governance-challenges-institutional-adaptation-new-politics-space-1-patsy-healey [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hope Sr, K. R. (2020b). Peace, justice and inclusive institutions: overcoming challenges to the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 16. Global Change, Peace & Security, 32(1), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2019.1667320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hope, K. R. (2020a). Corruption reduction as a target of the sustainable development goals: Applying indicators and policy frameworks. In The emerald handbook of crime, justice and sustainable development (pp. 105-130). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-355-520201009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Jean, S. (2019). Leadership and the rule of law in conflict and post-conflict societies: a leadership approach through the sustainable development goals. International Journal of Public Leadership, 15(3), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-06-2019-0031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2024). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and 2024 update. Available at SSRN 5154675. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5154675 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kirk, K. (2024). Expanding Capabilities: The Impact of International Student Mobility on Peacebuilding. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/expanding-capabilities-impact-international/docview/3214191677/se-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Komatsu, T. (2024). Education and Social Cohesion in a Post-conflict and Divided Nation: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Springer Nature. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-99-6519-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kostiuk, V., & Iryna, D. (2024). Effectiveness of international legal instruments to combat corruption. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 2(29), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-herald/2.2024.18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Lazarus, L. (2020). Securitizing sustainable development? The coercive sting in SDG 16. In Sustainable development goals and human rights (pp. 155-169). Springer International Publishing. http://www.springer.com/series/15339 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Leal Filho, W., Tripathi, S. K., Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O. D., Giné-Garriga, R., Orlovic Lovren, V., & Willats, J. (2019). Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(2), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1505674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Lima, V. (2021). Collaborative governance for sustainable development. In Peace, justice and strong institutions (pp. 79-90). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95960-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Limaye, D., Limaye, V., Pitani, R. S., Fortwengel, G., Sydymanov, A., Otzipka, C., & Ziesenis, P. (2018). Development of a quantitative scoring method for STROBE checklist. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica-Drug Research, 75(5), 1095-1106. https://doi.org/10.32383/appdr/84804 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. MacIntyre, A. (2018). The power of institutions: Political architecture and governance. Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Martheswaran, T. K., Hamdi, H., Al-Barty, A., Zaid, A. A., & Das, B. (2022). Prediction of dengue fever outbreaks using climate variability and Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques in a stochastic susceptible-infected-removed model. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 5459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09489-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. McDermott, C. L., et al. (2019). SDG 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions-A political ecology perspective. In Sustainable development goals: Their impacts on forests and people (pp. 510-540). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Milton, S. (2021). Higher education and sustainable development goal 16 in fragile and conflict-affected contexts. Higher Education, 81(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00617-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Monkelbaan, J. (2019). Governance for the sustainable development goals. Singapura: Spinger. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-13-0475-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Niemczyk, A., Gródek-Szostak, Z., Seweryn, R., & Grzega, U. (2024). Women and Sustainable Development: A European Cross-Country Analysis. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003477532 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Osborn, D., Cutter, A., & Ullah, F. (2015). Universal sustainable development goals. Understanding the transformational challenge for developed countries, 2(1), 1-25. https://tanazur.com.pk/index.php/tanazur/article/view/355 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Qadeer, M., Kazmi, S. S., & Khan, A. S. (2024). Global economic inequality: A threat to stability and security. Tanazur, 5(3), 155-190. https://tanazur.com.pk/index.php/tanazur/article/view/355/545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Ramcharan, R. (2021). SDG 16 and the human rights architecture in Southeast Asia: A complementary protection process. Journal of human rights, 20(2), 228-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2020.1841609 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Roche, C., Wall, P. J., & Lewis, D. (2023). Ethics and diversity in artificial intelligence policies, strategies and initiatives. AI and Ethics, 3(4), 1095-1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00218-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Satterthwaite, M. L., & Dhital, S. (2019). Measuring access to justice: Transformation and technicality in SDG 16.3. Global Policy, 10, 96-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12597 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Silander, D. (2020). Agenda 2030 and the EU on peace, justice and strong institutions. In Implementing sustainable development goals in Europe (pp. 162-184). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789909975.00014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Trends, G. (2017). Challenges and opportunities in the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Development Programme& United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 0-3. https://cdn.unrisd.org/assets/library/books/pdf-files/global-trends_undp-and-unrisd_final.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & STROBE Initiative (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet (London, England), 370(9596), 1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Wamsler, C., & Restoy, F. (2020). Emotional Intelligence and the Sustainable Development Goals: Supporting peaceful, just, and inclusive societies. Peace, justice and strong institutions, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95960-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. World Bank Group. (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. World Bank Publications. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. World Bank Group. (2024). Global Economic Prospects, January 2024. World Bank Publications. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/661f109500bf58fa36a4a46eeace6786-0050012024/original/GEP-Jan-2024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.