A Comprehensive Review of Work Connectivity Behavior After-Hours and Its Impact on Employees

Authors

Wing-cheung TANG

MCGI, CMGR, FCMI, FIMA, DBA Candidate, Globalnxt University, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300346

Subject Category: Work Connectivity

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 4674-4685

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-19

Accepted: 2026-03-24

Published: 2026-04-08

Abstract

Work Connectivity Behavior After-Hours (WCBA) has become a prominent feature of the modern digital work environment, substantially reshaping how employees engage with their job responsibilities beyond standard hours. This article offers an extensive overview of the academic literature on WCBA, integrating studies from 2014 to 2025 to elucidate its theoretical underpinnings, empirical findings, and practical consequences. The analysis highlights four principal theoretical approaches (Conservation of Resources Theory, the Job Demands-Resources Model, Boundary Theory, and the Effort-Recovery Model) each providing unique perspectives on the impacts of after-hours connectivity on employees. The evidence suggests that WCBA presents a paradox: it may improve perceived job control and flexibility but also risks exhausting self-regulatory capacities, hindering psychological detachment, and fostering emotional exhaustion, burnout, and intentions to leave. Important moderating factors include individual characteristics such as core self-evaluations, personality traits, and segmentation preferences, alongside contextual elements like job complexity, social support, and organizational norms. Interventions designed to restrict after-hours connectivity, such as right-to-disconnect policies, seem to achieve only modest success unless accompanied by modifications in organizational culture and management practices. The review ends by pointing out important gaps in the research, such as unanswered questions about causality, cross-cultural applicability, technological nuances, and the effectiveness of interventions. It also suggests areas for future research.

Keywords

job performance, psychological detachment, right to disconnect, work connectivity behaviour after-hours, work-life boundary

Downloads

References

1. Bennett, A. A., Lanivich, S. E., Lyons, L. M., & Zhou, F. (2025). An effort-recovery model for early-stage entrepreneurs’ work demands: the role of recovery experiences. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 37(2), 173-197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bipp, T., Kleingeld, A., & Ebert, T. (2019). Core self-evaluations as a personal resource at work for motivation and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109556. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Carreri, A., Dordoni, A., & Poggio, B. (2022). Work-life balance and beyond: premises and challenges. In Research handbook on work–life balance (pp. 8-26). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chat-Uthai, M., Wanarat, P., & Kanitpong, T. (2019). The efficiency of human capital management for a fast-paced economies and business transformation. In Proceedings of NIDA International Business Conference 2019–Transforming Business to the Future. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, L., & Zhang, S. (2025). The dual effects of work connectivity behavior after-hours on employee behaviors: balancing psychological job control and ICT anxiety. Behavioral Sciences, 15(6), 796. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chiang, N. T., Kao, R. H., Ma, H. Y., & Cho, C. C. (2025). The impact of after-hours messaging on job stress and burnout among Taiwan’s border police: the roles of social support and coping strategies. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. (2025). What are mechanisms? Ways of conceptualizing and studying causal mechanisms. Organizational Research Methods, 10944281251318727. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2011). The job demands-resources model: Challenges for future research. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(2), 1-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Desrochers, S., & Sargent, L. D. (2004). Boundary/border theory and work-family Integration1. Organization Management Journal, 1(1), 40-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Giunchi, M., Peña-Jimenez, M., & Petrilli, S. (2023). Work-family boundaries in the digital age: a study in France on technological intrusion, work-family conflict, and stress. La Medicina del Lavoro, 114(4), e2023039. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resources theory: Its implication for stress, health, and resilience. The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping, 127-147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hu, Y., Kuang, T., & Lu, Y. (2024). The effect of work connectivity behavior after-hours on emotional exhaustion: The role of psychological detachment and work-family segmentation preference. Sage Open, 14(3), 21582440241281417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kao, J. C., Ma, H. Y., Rui-Hsin, K., & Cho, C. C. (2024). The effect of supervisors making after-hours work requests on employees’ job stress: the cross-level contextual effect of social support. Policing: An International Journal, 47(4), 617-634. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Li, H., Li, J., Zeng, L., & Su, L. (2025). A meta-analysis of the influence of work connectivity behavior after-hours on employees: The mediating role of work autonomy and psychological detachment. Advances in Psychological Science, 33(3), 411-424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Li, L., Shi, G., & Zheng, X. (2025). Differential effects of proactive and reactive work connectivity behavior after-hours on well-being at work: A boundary theory perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nilsen, W., Nordberg, T., Lescoeur, K., Ingelsrud, M. H,, Egeland, C. (2026). What do we know about limiting after-hours availability expectations and work-related connectivity? A systematic review of interventions and policies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 52(3), 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ogueji, I. A., Okoloba, M. M., & Demoko Ceccaldi, B. M. (2022). Coping strategies of individuals in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Psychology, 41(11), 7493-7499. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Park, Y., Fritz, C., & Jex, S. M. (2011). Relationships between work-home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: the role of communication technology use at home. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(4), 457-467. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Qu, J., Hu, H., Lv, S., Cheng, Z., Zhao, R., Wan, G., & Mao, J. (2025). Work connectivity behavior after-hours and occupational fatigue in OR nurse-parents: a latent profile analysis and the mediating role of psychological detachment. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1709488. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Quan, J., van Dierendonck, D., Wu, Z., & Feng, T. (2025). Constrained by work: Linking daily work connectivity behavior after-hours to next-day employee job performance. Journal of Business Research, 200, 115640. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rasulova, D., & Tanova, C. (2025). The constant ping: Examining the effects of after- work connectivity on employee turnover intention. Acta Psychologica, 254, 104789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Saadeh, I. M., & Suifan, T. S. (2020). Job stress and organizational commitment in hospitals: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 28(1), 226-242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Saleh, K. M., Hasan, A. A., & Jawad, A. B. (2023). The Moderating Effect of Burnout in Relationship Between Job Complexity and Psychological Detachment. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 17(8), 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tenakwah, E. S., Tenakwah, E. J., Amponsah, M., Eyaa, S., Boateng, E., & Okhawere, N. (2022). Adoption of sustainable technologies during crisis: examining employees’ perception and readiness across cultures. Sustainability, 14(8), 4605. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Thompson, M. J., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Vogel, R. M. (2020). The cost of being ignored: Emotional exhaustion in the work and family domains. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(2), 186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ulbegi, İ. D., & Iplik, E. (2025). Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. SAGE Open, 15(3), 21582440251359396. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wang, C., Huang, J., & Zhu, J. (2025). The Impact of Work Connectivity Behavior on Employee Time Theft: The Role of Revenge Motive and Leader–Member Exchange. Behavioral Sciences, 15(6), 738. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wang, M., & Zhao, Z. (2022). A cultural-centered model based on user experience and learning preferences of online teaching platforms for Chinese national university students: Taking teaching platforms of WeCom, VooV meeting, and DingTalk as examples. Systems, 10(6), 216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wentz, K., Gyllensten, K., Sluiter, J. K., & Hagberg, M. (2020). Need for recovery in relation to effort from work and health in four occupations. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 93(2), 243-259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wu, F., Ren, Z., Wang, Q., He, M., Xiong, W., Ma, G., ... & Zhang, X. (2021). The relationship between job stress and job burnout: the mediating effects of perceived social support and job satisfaction. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(2), 204-211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zong, S., Han, Y., & Li, M. (2022). Not my job, I do not want to do it: the effect of illegitimate tasks on work disengagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 719856. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles