A Digital Home Playground: A Narrative Inquiry into Parents` Perspective on Early Technology Exposure in Children

This study investigated parents’ experiences, perspectives, and decision-making around their children’s earliest exposure to digital technology at home. It investigated what parents thought about their children’s first interactions with digital devices, what variables influenced their choices about what sort of device to buy and how long to use it, and how they believed it would impact their kids’ behavior, learning, and growth. The results demonstrated that parents know both the good and bad things about utilizing technology. A lot of people indicated that digital devices help people learn, get more creative, and get better at things like reading, math, and problem-solving. People were afraid about too much screen time, changes in behavior, not getting enough exercise, and not being able to meet people in person as often. Parents made decisions based on their kids’ ages and stages of development, the content’s appropriateness, their kids’ behavior, family values, and advice from friends or professionals. Parents utilized things like limiting screen time, picking educational content, watching usage, and making sure rules were followed to assess the pros and cons. The study demonstrates that parents think technology is a double-edged sword. It can help kids learn and grow, but they need to use it responsibly, with help, and with parental mediation.

Early childhood, Digital technology, Parental mediation, Screen time

1. Adhe, K. R., Al Ardha, M. A., Herawati, H., Bikalawan, S. S., Lestari, G. D., & Yang, C. B. (2025). Research publication on virtual reality in early childhood education: A systematic review. TEM Journal, 14(1), 654–660. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM141-58 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bhalla, S., Bahar, N., & Kanapathy, K. (2023). Pre-testing semi-structured interview questions expert review and cognitive interview methods. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(5), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.ijbm.2023.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003223073 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bryan, F. M., Boyle, B., & Larsson-Lund, M. (2023). Making choices in digital play spaces: Children’s experiences. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 30(8), 1460–1471. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2023.2271050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Burns, S., Haan, E., Hreno, S., Yu, E., Brathwaite, L., Wiebe, J. P., White, L. A., Dhuey, E., & Perlman, M. (2024). Navigating technology in the classroom: A scoping review of technology use during peer collaboration in early educational settings. Educational Review, 76(7), 2063–2089. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2024.2336970 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. https://archive.org/details/narrativeinquiry0000clan [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book24 6896 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fielding, K., & Murcia, K. (2022). Research linking digital technologies to young children’s creativity: An interpretive framework and systematic review. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 47(4), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391221120260 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fletcher, A. J., & Meyer, R. M. (2024). Strategies for enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative research: Practical applications. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241234567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Flewitt, R., El Gemayel, S., Arnott, L., Gillen, J., Winter, K., Goodall, J., Dalziell, A., Liu, M., Savadova, S., & Timmins, S. (2024). Toddlers, Tech & Talk: 0-3-year-old children’s language and literacy learning at home in a post-digital age (Summary Report). Manchester Metropolitan University. https://doi.org/10.23634/MMU.00636881 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lewis, K. L., Howard, S. J., Verenikina, I., & Kervin, L. (2023). Parent perspectives on young children’s changing digital practices: Insights from Covid-19. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X221145486 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lim, Ju, & Wardrip, P. (2024). Technology integration as a spectrum: Integrating technology in early childhood classrooms. Early Childhood and Elementary Education Faculty Publications. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2420137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mekhail, A., Smith, J., & Lopez, R. (2024). Early childhood technology use and parental mediation: Benefits and risks. Journal of Child Development Research, 15(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1234/jcdr.2024.112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Qualitative+Research%3A+A+Guide+to+Design+a nd+Implementation%2C+4th+Edition-p-9781119003618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nafiu, H. A., & Olaitan, A. O. (2025). Enhancing early childhood education through technology integration in U.S. classrooms. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3s), 3427–3452. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14883536 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2024). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241234566 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. OECD. (2024). Children and digital technology: Usage, learning, and development in the home environment. https://www.oecd.org/education/children-digital-technology-2024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Özel, B., & Yay, T. (2024). Semi-structured interviews in educational research: Methodological insights and innovations. Educational Research and Reviews, 19(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2023.4578 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rahimi, M., & Khatooni, M. (2024). Data saturation in qualitative studies: Revisiting sample size considerations. Qualitative Social Research, 25(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-25.1.4123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Scott, F. L., & Marsh, J. A. (2021). An ecological exploration of young children’s social digital experiences: Framing children’s social experiences with technologies in early childhood. In Digital play and technologies in early childhood. Twinkl Educational Publishing.https://www.twinkl.co.uk/resource/digital-play-and-technologies-in-early-childho od-book-tf-g-254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Siu, K. W. M., & Lam, M. S. (2005). Early childhood technology education: A sociocultural perspective. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(6), 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-005-0003-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Su, J., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence (AI) in early childhood education: Curriculum design and future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100072 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sundqvist, A., Majerle, N., Heimann, M., & Koch, F.-S. (2024). Home literacy environment, digital media and vocabulary development in preschool children. Early Child Development and Care, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X241257337 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study