A Pre-Test Post-Test Study Using the Design Thinking Framework to Evaluate an Augmented Reality Book for Informal Learning in Public Libraries

Augmented Reality has been widely investigated as an educational technology that overlays digital content such as 3D models, animations, audio narration, and interactive quizzes onto physical media. Most existing studies on augmented reality books focus on formal education (schools, classrooms, and STEM learning). Only a small number examine how augmented reality books influence learning, engagement, or knowledge recall among public library users, especially younger children and casual readers. While Design Thinking is often used to create prototypes, few studies use its Testing phase to systematically evaluate learning effectiveness through repeated measurement. The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an augmented reality book in enhancing students’ knowledge recall and understanding of key places of interest. A set of questionnaires is being used to measure change in knowledge recall and understanding to the augmented reality experience. This study employed a quantitative research design to explore the effectiveness of an augmented reality book using a pre-test and post-test design. 70 participants in this study represented a broad spectrum of library users, supporting the inclusiveness of the study sample. Findings from pre-test and post-test results showed a significant increase in students’ post-test scores, indicating improved knowledge recall and understanding. The positive gain score and paired t-test results further confirmed that the augmented reality book enhanced learning performance.

effectiveness; design thinking; augmented reality

1. Abdilah, D., & Wulandari, D. (2024). Development of augmented reality book (AR-book) based science learning media on human digestive system material to improve student learning outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(7), 4235-4245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akşab, H. V., Özyurt, M., & Akşab, Ş. (2025). The Use of Augmented Reality in English Language Teaching: A Meta-Thematic Analysis. Disiplinlerarası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(20), 251-267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2025). Teaching and Learning with Research Cognitive Theory: Unlocking Curiosity and Creativity for Problem-Solving Skills. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. bin Meor Othman, F., Adnan, W. A. W., & Nasruddin, Z. A. (2020). Augmented Reality Storytelling Teachers and Preschool Children Experience. Proceedings of Fifth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology: ICICT 2020, London, Volume 1, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard business review, 86(6), 84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 536-544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cao, Y., Ng, G.-W., & Ye, S.-S. (2023). Design and evaluation for immersive virtual reality learning environment: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(3), 1964. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, L., Zhao, H., Shi, C., Wu, Y., Yu, X., Ren, W., Zhang, Z., & Shi, X. (2023). Enhancing multi-modal perception and interaction: an augmented reality visualization system for complex decision making. Systems, 12(1), 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dunleavy, M., & Dede, C. (2013). Augmented reality teaching and learning. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 735-745. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Garzón Álvarez, J. F. (2021). Augmented reality as a tool to enrich educational settings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gatchalian, R., & Leon, I. (2023). Integrating Multimodal Inputs such as Text, Audio, and Visuals in Learning by Reading Systems to Enhance Long-Term Knowledge Retention. Transdisciplinary Advances in Social Computing, Complex Dynamics, and Computational Creativity, 13(11), 27-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Grace D, T., Abel, C., & Salen Tekinbaş, K. (2025). Learning Curiosity through Play: Exploring the Role of Games and Interactive Design in Museums. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Graser, S., Kirschenlohr, F., & Böhm, S. (2024). User experience evaluation of augmented reality: A systematic literature review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.12777. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kwiecien, K., Chansanam, W., & Tuamsuk, K. (2025). Digital Cultural Heritage in Southeast Asia: Knowledge Structures and Resources in GLAM Institutions. Informatics, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ladachart, L., Khamlarsai, S., & Phothong, W. (2022). Cultivating a design thinking mindset in educationally disadvantaged students using a design-based activity. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 30(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Latif, W. B., Yasin, I. M. Y., Rahaman, M. A., Forid, M. S., Islam, M. N., & Hossain, M. Z. (2024). Impact of Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) on Interactive Learning Systems. Pacific Journal of Advanced Engineering Innovations, 1(1), 23-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lazaro, M. J., & Kim, S. (2024). Mind the Mix: Exploring the Cognitive Underpinnings of Multimodal Interaction in Augmented Reality Systems. Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Li, X., & Zaki, R. (2024). Harnessing the power of digital resources in mathematics education: The potential of augmented reality and artificial intelligence. In IoT, AI, and ICT for educational applications: Technologies to enable education for all (pp. 191-223). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lin, L., Dong, Y., Chen, X., Shadiev, R., Ma, Y., & Zhang, H. (2024). Exploring the impact of design thinking in information technology education: An empirical investigation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Liu, S., Sui, Y., You, Z., Shi, J., Wang, Z., & Zhong, C. (2024). Reading better with AR or print picture books? A quasi-experiment on primary school students’ reading comprehension, story retelling and reading motivation. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 11625-11644. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Masmuzidin, M. Z., Aziz, N. A. A., & Suhaimi, S. (2022). A Systematic Review of Augmented Reality Design for Young Children. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(17). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Novawan, A., Ismailia, T., Zuhro, C., Utami, L. D., Pratama, M. R., Karimah, K., & Haq, R. N. (2024). Design thinking approach to powerful material development in educational contexts: From theory to practice. International Journal of Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities (IJOSSH), 1(2), 125-145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pepper, C. (2024). The student experience of informal learning spaces in UK campus universities Loughborough University]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rahim, R. H. A., Nizam, D. N. M., Naim, N. F. M., & Baharum, A. (2024). Technology Usage For Education: Polytechnic Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Student. 2024 IEEE 6th Symposium on Computers & Informatics (ISCI), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Salehi, N. (2025). Teaching vocabulary with augmented reality: voices from junior high school English teachers. Discover Education, 4(1), 230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Shé, C. N., Farrell, O., Brunton, J., & Costello, E. (2022). Integrating design thinking into instructional design: The# OpenTeach case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 33-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2004). Exploring a cognitive basis for learning spatial relationships with augmented reality. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 1(4), 323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Siregar, T. (2025). Literature review: The use of GeoGebra software on mathematical comprehension ability. Preprint. https://doi. org/10.20944/preprints202510, 925, v1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Snyder, L. (2025). Unboxing object-based learning: exploring teachers' object-based pedagogies with museum kits in elementary classrooms University of British Columbia]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sung, H.-Y., Abdullah, N., & Huyen, N. T. (2023). Early literacy and family engagement: A cross-country analysis of caregivers’ perceptions of the public library's role in the digital age in Taiwan, Malaysia, and Vietnam. Information Development, 39(3), 480-499. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Vogel, J., Schuir, J., Koßmann, C., Thomas, O., Teuteberg, F., & Hamborg, K.-C. (2021). Let’s do design thinking virtually: design and evaluation of a virtual reality application for collaborative prototyping. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Wenger, E. (2022). Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. Understanding and using educational theories, 257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Yang, G., Yan, Y., Guo, S., & Wei, X. (2025). The Impact of Embedding Interactive Tasks in Augmented Reality Storybooks on Children's Reading Engagement and Reading Comprehension. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study