A Qualitative Case Study of a Community-Based Knowledge Intermediary Support Independent Smallholders
Authors
Faculty of Applied Social Science, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu (Malaysia)
Faculty of Applied Social Science, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu (Malaysia)
Faculty of Applied Social Science, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu (Malaysia)
Faculty of Applied Social Science, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu (Malaysia)
Faculty of Applied Social Science, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700015
Subject Category: Communication
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 186-199
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-06
Accepted: 2026-07-11
Published: 2026-07-22
Abstract
Sustainable palm oil certification, such as the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), was introduced as a voluntary global scheme to promote environmentally responsible palm oil production. The certification has become an important mechanism for strengthening sustainability practices in the palm oil sector while also aiming to improve socio-economic outcomes among independent smallholders. However, independent smallholders often face challenges in adopting and maintaining RSPO certification due to limited access to technical knowledge, administrative capacity, and institutional support, resulting in a gap between formal sustainability standards and everyday farming practices. This study examines how a community-based knowledge intermediary facilitates knowledge transfer to support independent smallholders in sustaining RSPO certification, drawing on a social innovation perspective. A qualitative case study approach was employed, involving in-depth interviews with members of a smallholder association and representatives from supporting institutions in Johor, Malaysia, supplemented by field observations and document analysis. The data were analyzed using QSR NVivo version 14. The findings indicate that the intermediary organization plays a critical role in translating certification requirements into practical, locally relevant guidance, delivering training programs, and assisting smallholders in record-keeping and compliance processes. These mechanisms enhance smallholders’ capacity to understand and sustain certification requirements over time. This study contributes to the literature on sustainability certification and social innovation by demonstrating how community-based knowledge intermediaries function as mediating actors that bridge institutional sustainability standards and local smallholder practices, thereby supporting the long-term sustainability of certification systems in resource-constrained contexts.
Keywords
Sustainable Palm Oil Certification, Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, Community-Based Knowledge Intermediary, Social Innovation
Downloads
References
1. Abad, A. G., & Ezponda, A. G. (2022). Controversies in social innovation research. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(2), 224–244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abdul Majid, N., Ramli, Z., Md Sum, S., & Awang, A. H. (2021). Sustainable palm oil certification scheme frameworks and impacts: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(6), 3263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adwiyah, R., Syaukat, Y., Indrawan, D., & Mulyati, H. (2023). Examining sustainable supply chain management performance in the palm oil industry with the triple bottom line approach. Sustainability, 15(18), 13362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Alamsyah, R. T. P., Wulandari, E., Saidah, Z., & Hapsari, H. (2024). Discovering sustainable finance models for smallholder farmers: A bibliometric approach to agricultural innovation adoption. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Amarathunga, M. K. S. L. D., Mahindarathne, M. P., Senevirathna, M. R. M., Welhena, C., & AMC, A. A. (2023). The effectiveness of farmer field school extension approach for technology transfer to tea smallholders in Sri Lanka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Aziz, N. F., Chamhuri, N., & Batt, P. J. (2021). Barriers and benefits arising from the adoption of sustainable certification for smallholder oil palm producers in Malaysia: A systematic review of literature. Sustainability, 13(18), 10009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bauwens, T., Huybrechts, B., & Dufays, F. (2020). Understanding the diverse scaling strategies of social enterprises as hybrid organizations: The case of renewable energy cooperatives. Organization & Environment, 33(2), 195–219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bucio-Mendoza, S., & Solis-Navarrete, J. A. (2024). Institutionalising social innovation in the Global South: Lessons learned. Heliyon, 10(20), eXXXXX. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Cawley, A., Heanue, K., Hilliard, R., O’Donoghue, C., & Sheehan, M. (2023). How knowledge transfer impact happens at the farm level: Insights from advisers and farmers in the Irish agricultural sector. Sustainability, 15(4), 3226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Cunha, J., Silva, F., Ferreira, C., Araújo, M., Nunes, M. L., & Dall-Orsoletta, A. (2025). Determining the impact of social innovation across different contexts: A review and survey on supporting metrics. SN Social Sciences, 5(9), 140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Degli Innocenti, E., & Oosterveer, P. (2020). Opportunities and bottlenecks for upstream learning within RSPO certified palm oil value chains. Journal of Rural Studies, 78, 426–437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. De Vos, R. E., Suwarno, A., Slingerland, M., Van Der Meer, P. J., & Lucey, J. M. (2021). Independent oil palm smallholder management practices and yields: Can RSPO certification make a difference? Environmental Research Letters, 16(6), 065015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. De Vos, R. E., Suwarno, A., Slingerland, M., Van Der Meer, P. J., & Lucey, J. M. (2023). Pre-certification conditions of independent oil palm smallholders in Indonesia: Assessing prospects for RSPO certification. Land Use Policy, 130, 106660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Ekaputri, A. D., Gaveau, D. L., Heilmayr, R., & Carlson, K. M. (2025). Uneven participation of independent and contract smallholders in certified palm oil mill markets in Indonesia. Communications Earth & Environment, 6(1), 721. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Genov, N. (2021). Paradigmatic upgrading of social innovation studies. Journal of Sociology, 57(4), 825– 841. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Irawan, N. C., & Supriyadi, T. (2024). What are the major barriers and challenges faced by independent oil palm smallholder farmers in RSPO certification? Journal of Rural and Urban Community Studies, 2(2), 39– 53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Jalonen, H. (2022). Complexity-informed interpretation of social innovation. Public Money & Management, 42(5), 356–359. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Johnson, A. (2022). The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) and transnational hybrid governance in Ecuador’s palm oil industry. World Development, 149, 105710. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Judijanto, L. (2025). Empowerment of oil palm smallholders for sustainable palm oil. Veredas do Direito, 22, e3323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Kale, R. B., Dangi, P. A., Nikam, V., Khandagale, K., Gadge, S. S., & Mahajan, V. (2025). How are new collective models transforming support for smallholder farmers? Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, 1542676. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Klerkx, L., & Begemann, S. (2020). Supporting food systems transformation. Agricultural Systems, 184, 102901. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Korir, L., Manning, L., Moore, H. L., Lindahl, J. F., Gemechu, G., Mihret, A., et al. (2023). Adoption of dairy technologies in smallholder dairy farms in Ethiopia. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1070349. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Le, P. B., & Tuyen, N. T. (2025). Fostering organizational learning capability through leadership practices and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Martinez-Nuñez, C., Velado-Alonso, E., Avelino, J., Rey, P. J., ten Hoopen, G. M., Pe’er, G., et al. (2025). Tailored policies for perennial woody crops are crucial to advance sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, 8(2), 133–141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Mazorodze, A. H., & Buckley, S. (2020). A review of knowledge transfer tools in knowledge-intensive organisations. South African Journal of Information Management, 22(1), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Mesfin, H., Tessema, Y. M., Tirivayi, N., & Nillesen, E. (2023). Effective knowledge transmission and learning in agriculture. Africa Development/Afrique et Développement, 48(1), 213–244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Naidu, L., & Moorthy, R. (2021). A review of key sustainability issues in Malaysian palm oil industry. Sustainability, 13(19), 10839. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Nicholls, A., & Murdock, A. (Eds.). (2011). Social innovation: Blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. OECD. (2025). Starting, scaling and sustaining social innovation. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Ochago, R., Dentoni, D., & Trienekens, J. (2024). Unraveling the connection between coffee farmers’ value chain challenges and experiential knowledge. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 30(2), 181–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Ostfeld, R., & Reiner, D. M. (2024). Seeing the forest through the palms. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Ouerghemmi, H., Frija, A., Souissi, A., Carpentier, I., Shiri, Z., Dhehibi, B., & Rejeb, H. (2024). Are farmer organizations effective intermediaries? Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, 1440086. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Pareira, S. P. (2021). RSPO certification in Indonesia: A complex case of global environmental governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Pel, B., Haxeltine, A., Avelino, F., Dumitru, A., Kemp, R., Bauler, T., et al. (2020). Towards a theory of transformative social innovation. Research Policy, 49(8), 104080. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Pretty, J., Attwood, S., Bawden, R., van den Berg, H., Bharucha, Z. P., Dixon, J., et al. (2020). Assessment of the growth in social groups for sustainable agriculture. Global Sustainability, 3, e23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Rajasekhar, D. (2020). Concept and theories of social innovation. In Cooperatives and Social Innovation. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Reich, C., & Musshoff, O. (2025). Oil palm smallholders and the road to certification. Journal of Environmental Management, 375, 124303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Rizal, A. R. A., & Nordin, S. M. (2022). Smallholders participation in sustainable certification. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 978993. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Rosdin, R., Cheah, W. Y., & Moslim, R. (2023). Systematic literature review on social and economic impacts of palm oil certification. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. RSPO. (2020). RSPO who we are: 2020 data. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. RSPO. (2024). RSPO Impact Report 2024. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Saito, K., et al. (2023). Towards agricultural innovation systems. Scientific African, 19, e01576. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Silici, L., Rowe, A., Suppiramaniam, N., & Knox, J. W. (2021). Building adaptive capacity of smallholder agriculture. Environmental Research Communications, 3(12), 122001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Siti-Dina, R. P., Er, A. C., & Cheah, W. Y. (2023). Social issues and challenges among oil palm smallholders in Malaysia. Sustainability, 15(4), 3123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Suhardjo, I., Akroyd, C., & Suparman, M. (2024). ESG score disparity in palm oil companies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(7), 296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Thar, S. P., Ramilan, T., Farquharson, R., & Chen, D. (2021). Decision support tools for smallholder farmers. Agriculture, 11(6), 516. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Veriasa, T. O., Nurrunisa, M., & Fadhli, N. (2024). Implications of RSPO certification on farm productivity in Riau. Forest and Society, 8(1), 123–139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Wibowo, L. R., Erdi, E., Hutabarat, S., Nurfatriani, F. N., Utomo, M., Nawireja, I. K., et al. (2023). Accelerating certification of oil palm smallholders. Forest and Society, 7(2), 263–294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Watts, J. D., Pasaribu, K., Irawan, S., Tacconi, L., Martanila, H., Wiratama, C. G. W., et al. (2021). Challenges faced by smallholders in achieving sustainable palm oil certification in Indonesia. World Development, 146, 105565. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Zeng, R., Abate, M. C., Baozhong, C., Addis, A. K., Yi, X., Jiang, S., et al. (2025). Agricultural socialized services in China’s smallholder farming systems. Frontiers in Agronomy, 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Zhang, X. (2024). Collective transformation: Fostering peer-driven transformational leadership in communities of practice. In European Conference on Knowledge Management Proceedings, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Communication Strategies among Promoters During MATTA Fair 2025
- An Examination of Colleen Ballinger’s Experience in Social Media: Cancel Culture Chronicle
- Communication Patterns in Conflict Interactions in Premarital Couples Who Are in Abusive Relationships
- Social Media Use on Mental Health Outcomes among Adolescents and Young Adults in Port Harcourt City
- (Un)Successful Error Repairs in L2 Communication