A Review of Theories of Reading and Writing Development in Literacy Instruction

This article reviews major theories of reading and writing that have shaped literacy instruction and examines their implications for classroom practice. It discusses influential perspectives in reading, including maturation theory, emergent literacy, family literacy, phonics-based and decoding theories, whole language, interactive models, the Simple View of Reading, Scarborough’s Reading Rope, psycholinguistic accounts, metacognitive theory, constructivist perspectives, and sociocultural and critical literacy theories. In relation to writing, the article examines cognitive process theory, genre theory, sociocultural perspectives, and process-oriented approaches. The central argument is that no single theory sufficiently explains the complexity of literacy development. Rather, effective literacy instruction requires an integrated perspective that recognizes the reciprocal relationship between reading and writing, the need for explicit instruction in foundational skills, and the centrality of meaning-making, discourse, culture, and context. The review concludes that balanced, evidence-informed, developmentally responsive, and context-sensitive instruction provides a strong foundation for developing proficient, critical, and adaptable readers and writers.

Theory, literacy theories, literacy development theories, literacy instruction

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the Simple View of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ehri, L. C. (2002). Phases of acquisition in learning to read words and implications for teaching. In R. Stainthorp & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Learning and teaching reading (pp. 7–28). British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135–154). Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation. Bergin & Garvey. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Erlbaum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Goodman, K. S. (1990). The reading process. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 11–21). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gough, P. B., Juel, C., & Griffith, P. L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 35–48). Erlbaum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Alliance for Excellent Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hempenstall, K. (1996). The whole language approach to reading: An empiricist critique. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1(3), 22–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Holdaway, D. (1979). The foundations of literacy. Ashton Scholastic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Klein, M. L., Peterson, S., & Simington, L. (2004). Teaching reading in the elementary grades. Pearson Education Canada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kim, Y.-S. G. (2020). Interactive dynamic literacy model: An integrative theoretical framework for reading-writing relations. In R. Alves, T. Limpo, & M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (pp. 11–34). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Morphett, M. V., & Washburne, C. (1931). When should children begin to read? The Elementary School Journal, 31(7), 496–503. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nkhata, B., Simui, F., & Mkandawire, S. B. (2019). Teaching literacy in the primary school. University of Zambia Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 291–309). International Reading Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Rapcsak, S. Z., Henry, M. L., Teague, S. L., Carnahan, S. D., & Beeson, P. M. (2007). Do dual-route models accurately predict reading and spelling performance in individuals with acquired alexia and agraphia? Neuropsychologia, 45(11), 2519–2524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Rodgers, G. (2001). The history of beginning reading: From teaching by sound to teaching by meaning (Vol. 2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rumelhart, D. E. (2005). Toward an interactive model of reading. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1149–1179). International Reading Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading disabilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Shanahan, T. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 171–183). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Stanley, S. (2007). An analysis of Rx for Discovering Reading RTM for elementary students below average in reading. ProQuest Information and Learning Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Taylor, D. (1983). Family literacy: Young children learning to read and write. Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Weaver, C. (1988). Reading: Process and practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests