A Scoping Review of the Benedictine Rule of Leadership: A Contemporary Analysis Based on Galbraith and Galbraith

The focus of this review is The Benedictine Rule of Leadership, written by Galbraith & Galbraith (2004). It seeks to explore how a leadership framework dating back several centuries can remain relevant in present-day contexts. Based on the Rule of St. Benedict, the research highlights five central leadership principles: vision and purpose, empowerment and growth, culture and community, humility and integrity, and problem-solving and fairness. In a scoping literature review, thematic analysis was applied to academic sources found regarding the relationship between these principles and present-day ideas about leadership, such as servant leadership, ethical leadership, and authentic leadership. As shown by the findings, the Benedictine approach to leadership represents not only an interesting historical phenomenon but also a highly practical leadership ideology based on the interrelationship between ethics, personal integrity, and sustainable development. Although rooted in religion, this approach has universal applicability to various organizational settings where the establishment of trust, motivation, and stability is crucial. As can be seen, the relevance of this approach to modern organizational reality cannot be ignored, although there are potential limitations and challenges of applying Benedictine leadership in diverse, secular, or multicultural organizations.

Benedictine leadership, servant leadership, organizational sustainability, leadership theory

1. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00016-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Galbraith, C., & Galbraith, O. (2004). The Benedictine rule of leadership. Adams Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Grint, K. (2010). Leadership: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (6th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 855–869. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.35785678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Neubert, M. J., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Roberts, J. A., & Chonko, L. B. (2009). The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behavior: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0016-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nielsen, R., Marrone, J. A., & Slay, H. S. (2010). A new look at humility: Exploring a multifaceted concept. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809350894 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012). Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787–818. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Reave, L. (2005). Spiritual values and practices related to leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(5), 655–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.07.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J. C., & Santora, J. C. (2008). Defining and measuring servant leadership behaviour in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), 402–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00761.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. St. Benedict of Nursia. (2001). The rule of St. Benedict (J. McCann, Trans.). Penguin Classics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Vera, D., & Rodriguez-Lopez, A. (2004). Strategic virtues and leadership: Humility as a source of competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.08.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being