A Semiotic Analysis of Fairness Cream Advertisements and Its Impact on the Perception of Indian Women on Beauty Standards

Authors

Ranjitha Bala

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Southern University College, Johor (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100170

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 2130-2147

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-21

Accepted: 2025-11-28

Published: 2025-12-03

Abstract

Advertisements serve as pivotal cultural tools that shape consumer perceptions, influence purchasing behavior and construct social meanings. In the context of beauty and cosmetics, their persuasive force is particularly directed toward women, often reinforcing the long-standing association between fair skin and desirability. This study examines the semiotic strategies employed in fairness cream advertisements to demonstrate how they commodify the female body and reproduce normative beauty standards among Indian women. Drawing on multimodal semiotic theories from Structuralist Model of Signification of Saussure, Barthes (1972) and Kress and van Leeuwen (2006) the analysis explores how signs, symbols, color schemes, narrative structures and ideological mythologies collectively sustain the notion that fairness signifies beauty, confidence, success and social approval. The study focuses on both lexical and visual semiotics, analyzing linguistic choices, metaphors, presuppositions and transformation narratives that implicitly encode colorist ideologies. Complemented by feminist theory and postcolonial perspectives, the analysis further interrogates the gendered pressures, patriarchal expectations and colonial residues embedded within fairness discourse. Findings reveal that fairness cream advertisements systematically normalize colorism by idealizing lighter skin tones while marginalizing darker complexions. These representational patterns shape self-perceptions of women, contributing to internalized bias, diminished self-esteem, and aspirational conformity to Eurocentric beauty norms. The study highlights the urgent need for inclusive media practices that challenge discriminatory beauty narratives and support diverse representations. By examining the intersections of semiotics, gender and postcolonial identity, this research contributes to broader discussions on beauty, power and inequality in contemporary Indian society.

Keywords

Semiotics, colorism, beauty, Indian women, advertising

Downloads

References

1. Banala, B., Turkson, S., & Yanushevskaya, I. (2023). Fairness cream advertising and the creation and re-creation of beauty ideology in the Indian context. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 26(4), 1005–1022.https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494231157090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (2023). The social construction of reality. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 92-101). Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320609 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Case, A. (2020). Challenging The Fairness Paradigm in India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chand, P., & Chaudhary, S. (2012). Advertising discourse: Studying creation and perception of meaning. International Journal of English and Literature, 3(2), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEL11.070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Correa, D. M. (2011). The construction of gender identity in India through television advertisements: A semiotic analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Australian Catholic University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Crasta, M. M. (2020). The Fair and Lovely Phenomenon: A case study into a country's obsession with fairness and the media that pursues it. Bayan College International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(1). https://bayancollegeijmr.com/index.php/ijmr/issue/view/1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Eco, U. (1979). A theory of semiotics (Vol. 217). Indiana University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., Bardone-Cone, A. M., Bulik, C. M., Wonderlich, S. A., Crosby, R. D., & Engel, S. G. (2014). Examining an elaborated sociocultural model of disordered eating among college women: The roles of social comparison and body surveillance. Body image, 11(4), 488-500.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.07.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of women quarterly, 21(2),173-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Glenn, E. N. (2008). Yearning for lightness: Transnational circuits in the marketing and consumption of skin lighteners. Gender & society, 22(3), 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208316089 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: a meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological bulletin, 134(3), 460. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Huppatz, D. J. (2011). Roland barthes, mythologies. Design and Culture, 3(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470810X12863771378833 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Iqbal, A., Danish, M. H., & Tahir, M. R. (2014). Exploitation of women in beauty products of Fair and Lovely: A critical discourse analysis study. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 2(9), 122-131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jha, A. K., Raj, A., & Gangwar, R. (2017). A semiotic analysis of portraying gender in magazine advertisements. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(5), 1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jha, B. (2016). Representation of fair-skin beauty and the female consumer. IOSR. Journal Of Humanities and Social Scienc, 21(2), 01-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Khan, M. Saussure’s Theory of Sign and Signification. International Journal of English: Literature, Language & Skills. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kress, G & van Leeuwen, T. (1996; 2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Machin, D. (2007). Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Hodder Arnold. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Parameswaran, R., & Cardoza, K. (2009). Melanin on the margins: Advertising and the cultural politics of fair/light/white beauty in India. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 11(3), 213-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/152263790901100302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Patel, N. C., & Bhutiani, S. R. (2018). A semiotic approach through print advertisements: the changing Indian urban male. In Global Observations of the Influence of Culture on Consumer Buying Behavior (pp. 146-170). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Peirce, C. S. (1867). The philosophy of signs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Posner, R. (2009). Semiotics as a Theoretical Basis of Human Sciences. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 1(1), 78-103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Priss, U. (2001, August). A triadic model of information flow. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS’01), Stanford, CA, USA (pp. 159-171). Random House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Razi, S., Warris, S., Anjum, T., Fatima, M., & Kiran, S. (2024). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. The influence of fairness-cream advertisements on consumer attitude and behavior. Journal of Business Strategies, 18(1), 75–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Santoso, M., Duran, V., Lu, J., Austin, S. B., & Raffoul, A. (2025). # Skin-Lightening: A content analysis of the most popular videos promoting skin-lightening products on TikTok. Body Image, 52, 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101846 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Saha, S. (2019). A Semiotic Analysis of Select Beauty Products Ad Images and Their Impact on Self-Confidence. IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 13(3). IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 2019, Vol 13, Issue 3, p21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Shushmita, H. K. (2020). A multimodal analysis of Bangladeshi fairness product advertisements/Shushmita Hossain Khan (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Malaya). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Van Leeuwen, T. & Jewitt, C. (2001). Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wolf, N. (2013). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wollen, P. (2019). Signs and Meaning in the Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing. New Media & Society, 25(11), 3456–3472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Yelle, R. A. (2021). Semiotics. In The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion (pp. 434-444). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles