A Sociological Inquiry into Literature in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

This article explores literature in the age of artificial intelligence as a site where technology, power, and human imagination converge and quietly collide. It advances a sociological inquiry into how algorithmic systems reshape authorship, authority, and the production of meaning. Artificial intelligence is not treated merely as a tool but as a structural actor within the literary field, reconfiguring symbolic capital, institutional hierarchies, and the boundaries between creator and creation. Drawing on theories of cultural production and social systems, the study examines how machine learning models alter narrative form, aesthetic evaluation, and the circulation of texts. It argues that literature is entering a phase in which authorship becomes distributed, creativity hybridized, and interpretation increasingly mediated by computational infrastructures. Beneath the surface of efficiency and innovation lies a deeper transformation of epistemic power. Who speaks when a text is generated by an algorithm trained on collective memory. Who owns imagination when data becomes the raw material of culture. The article situates these questions within broader trajectories of digital modernity, considering both emancipatory potentials and new regimes of control. It proposes that literature remains a critical arena for negotiating human agency in technologically saturated societies. Rather than announcing the end of the human author, the analysis suggests a redefinition of literary subjectivity, one that reflects shifting configurations of knowledge, authority, and social legitimacy. In this emerging epoch, literature becomes a diagnostic instrument of civilizational change, revealing not only what we create with machines, but what we are becoming through them.

Sociology of Literature, Cultural Production, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Society

1. Anam, R. K. (2025). Anthony Giddens's structuration theory and relevance with sociology of knowledge. SOCIAL EDU: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 1(2), 73-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Antons, D. B. (2023). Computational literature reviews: Method, algorithms, and roadmap. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 107-138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chun, H. &. (2025). Toward New Organizational Sociology of Quantification: From Interlopers to Plurality and Contestation. Sociology Compass, 19(7). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Emigh, R. J. (2024). Whither Digitality? Relationship Between Orality, Literacy, and Digitality, Past and Present: From Spoken Traditions to Digital Media. The Annual Review of Sociology, 50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Finkielsztein, M. (2025). The sociology of boredom. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gregory, S. C. (2025). Introduction: Imagining Equitable Working Life in the Creative Industries–Constructions, Challenges, Contradictions. Journal of Sociology, 61(3), 363-372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hammer, R. &. (2025). Rethinking Historical Sociology: Learning from WEB Du Bois and the Black Radical Tradition. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 22(1), 171-189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Labadze, L. G. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review. International journal of Educational Technology in Higher education, 20(1), 56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Latinović, B. &. (2025). Social and Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in International Political Communication. Journal of UUNT: Informatics and Computer Sciences, 2(2), 15-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Latinović, B. (2023). THE SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE OF TRANSHUMANISM THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE SPORTS-MARKETING INDUSTRY. Sports Science & Health/Sportske Nauke i Zdravlje, 13(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Latinović, B. K. (2025). The Sociology of Artificial Intelligence Through the Lens of Ethics in the Digital Age. Journal of UUNT: Informatics and Computer Sciences, 2(1), 1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Liu, Z. (2021). Sociological perspectives on artificial intelligence: A typological reading. Sociology Compass, 15(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lowenthal, L. (2020). On sociology of literature. In Critical Theory and Society . Routledge, 40-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Papa, E. (2025). (Re) Thinking Literary Interpretation in the Digital Age: AI, Virtual Reality, and Immersive Reading. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 13(4), 46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Perreault, G. P. (2025). Epistemologies of digital news Production: Power and technological Adaptation in Knowledge Production. Digital Journalism, 13(3), 351-361. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Váňa, J. (2020). Theorizing the social through literary fiction: For a new sociology of literature. Cultural Sociology, 14(2), 180-200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Váňa, J. (2025). Sally Rooney and Cultural Sociology of Literature: Towards Epistemological Symmetry within Literature-and-Society Research. Journal of literary theory. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Woolgar, S. (1985). Why not a sociology of machines? The case of sociology and artificial intelligence. Sociology, 19(4), 557-572. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
• Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
• Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
• Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
• Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study