A Study of Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge among ALIVE Teachers

Authors

Cahar R. Cader, LPT, MA

Mindanao State University- Marawi City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0067

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 778-782

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-15

Accepted: 2026-01-21

Published: 2026-02-06

Abstract

This study investigated the levels of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge among Arabic Language and Islamic Values Education (ALIVE) teachers using a descriptive–correlational research design. Data were gathered through a validated self-assessment questionnaire grounded in the TPACK framework. Descriptive statistics were used to determine teachers’ knowledge levels across the three domains.
Results showed that ALIVE teachers demonstrated a very satisfactory level of knowledge in technology, pedagogy, and content. While strong content mastery and pedagogical competence were evident, lower ratings were observed in engagement with professional development activities and experimentation with new technologies. The findings highlight the need for sustained institutional support and continuous professional development to strengthen instructional innovation in ALIVE education.

Keywords

ALIVE teachers, TPACK, technology, pedagogy, content knowledge

Downloads

References

1. Al-Hadabi, A., & Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2021). Technology integration in Islamic and Arabic education: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 45–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Mahdi, A., & Bukhatir, M. (2020). Pedagogical practices and teacher effectiveness in Islamic education. Journal of Islamic Studies and Education, 7(1), 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Asum, S., & Abarquez, R. (2024). Implementation of ALIVE program in Philippine public schools: Teacher perceptions and challenges. Philippine Journal of Islamic Education, 12(1), 34–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. DepEd. (2011). Curriculum guide for Arabic Language and Islamic Values Education (ALIVE). Department of Education, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. DepEd. (2017). Department of Education Order No. 51, s. 2004: Implementation of the ALIVE program. Department of Education, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Emmer, E. T., & Evertson, C. M. (2016). Classroom management for middle and high school teachers (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ismail, H., & Manaros, R. (2021). ALIVE teachers in the Philippine context: A review of teaching practices and challenges. Asian Journal of Islamic Education, 5(2), 22–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Marasigan, J. (2019). ALIVE education and cultural identity in Muslim Filipino learners. Mindanao Studies, 17(1), 55–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Solaiman, R. (2020). Teacher perceptions on the implementation of ALIVE in Marawi City. Journal of Philippine Islamic Studies, 9(1), 15–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Teo, T. (2013). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 64, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. Paris: UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles