A Systematic Literature Review on Academic Writing Among Academicians: Challenges and Solutions

This systematic literature review (SLR) examines academic writing among academicians with a specific focus on the challenges encountered and the solutions proposed within higher education contexts. Academic writing is a core scholarly practice that directly influences research productivity, professional identity, and knowledge dissemination; however, many academicians continue to experience persistent difficulties that hinder effective scholarly communication. Despite growing research on academic writing, existing studies remain fragmented, often addressing isolated aspects of writing challenges without offering an integrated synthesis of challenges and solutions. To address this gap, the present review systematically synthesizes recent empirical evidence on academic writing challenges and support mechanisms among academicians. Guided by the PRISMA protocol, a comprehensive search was conducted using two major databases, Scopus and Web of Science. Advanced searching strategies were applied using four key thematic keyword clusters: (1) cognitive and linguistic challenges, (2) lack of confidence, (3) ethical issues, and (4) solutions and support mechanisms. Inclusion criteria were limited to peer-reviewed journal articles published in English within a defined recent timeframe. Following identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and quality appraisal procedures, 18 primary studies were retained for qualitative synthesis. The analysis revealed four dominant themes. Cognitive and linguistic challenges emerged as the most frequently reported obstacles, encompassing difficulties in critical thinking, genre conventions, source integration, and language proficiency. Issues related to confidence and sense of belonging were closely linked to academic identity formation and writing motivation. Ethical concerns, particularly plagiarism awareness and responsible use of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, represented an increasingly prominent challenge. In response, pedagogical and institutional supports, including academic literacies approaches, writing communities, mentoring, and structured publication guidance, were identified as key solutions. Overall, the review highlights academic writing as a multidimensional and socially situated practice and underscores the need for coordinated pedagogical and institutional strategies to support sustainable academic writing development among academicians.

Academic writing; academicians; cognitive and linguistic challenges; research self-efficacy; pedagogical and institutional support

1. Abouzahra, A., Sabraoui, A., & Afdel.K. (2020). Model composition in Model Driven Engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 125(106316). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akosile, S., Ige, M., Abiri, T., Abiodun, P., & Owolabi, O. (2025). Perception and Adaptation of First-Year International Graduate Students Towards Academic Writing: A Case Study at a School of Engineering. 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--57033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Canli, Z., & Yağiz, O. (2024). A Contrastive Investigation into the Non-native Speakers of English Academicians’ Academic Writing Cognitions and Challenges in the First and Second Languages. Arab World English Journal, 15(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no1.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hadizadeh, A., & Kanık, M. (2025). Undergraduate Students’ Conceptions of Academic Writing at the Intersection of English Medium Instruction and the Digital Age. European Journal of Education, 60(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Harshalatha, S., & Sreenivasulu, Y. (2024). Exploring Academic Writing Needs and Challenges Experienced by ESL Learners: A Literature Review. . World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 406–412. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Harshalatha, S., & Sreenivasulu, Y. (2025). Investigating the language issues in academic writing: A study on the research scholars at VIT University-Vellore. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Horstmanshof, L., & Brownie, S. (2013). A scaffolded approach to Discussion Board use for formative assessment of academic writing skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.604121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Li, M. (2024). Non-native English-speaking (NNES) students’ English academic writing experiences in higher education: A meta-ethnographic qualitative synthesis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Listyani. (2025). EFL Students’ Challenges & Solutions During and After the Pandemic: A Four-Year Study in an Academic Writing Class. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(1), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1501.25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, A. D. (2009). PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram. In The PRISMA statement (Vol. 6, p. 1000097). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Pretorius, L., Huynh, H. H., Pudyanti, A. A. A. R., Li, Z., Noori, A. Q., & Zhou, Z. (2025). Empowering international PhD students: Generative AI, Ubuntu, and the decolonisation of academic communication. Internet and Higher Education, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Suleimanova, O. A., & Lykova, T. A. (2023). Academic writing details in critical perspective. Training, Language and Culture, 7(3), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2023-7-3-94-102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Tovar Viera, V. R., Medina Jerez, E. L., & Bajaña Pineda, M. L. (2024). Challenges in developing productive skills in English: learners’ insights. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia - Serie de Conferencias, 3. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.659 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Uzun, K. (2024). Enhancing written communication skills for academic purposes. In Teaching English for Academic Purposes: Theory into Practice (pp. 169–190). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Zhang, W., & Zhang, Z. (2025). Dissemination Mechanism of Internet Slang and Social Identity Construction among Youth Groups. Annals of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.65281/639270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zhang, Y., Eto, H., & Cui, J. (2025). Linguistic challenges of writing papers in English fo acholryl publication: perceptions of Chinese academics in science ad technology. PLos One, 20(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study