Academic Stressors, Coping Strategies, and Online Learning Challenges among Malaysian Health Science Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Authors
Faculty of Applied Sciences (FTAS) Open University Malaysia (OUM), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
Faculty of Applied Sciences (FTAS) Open University Malaysia (OUM), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
Faculty of Applied Sciences (FTAS) Open University Malaysia (OUM), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
Faculty of Applied Sciences (FTAS) Open University Malaysia (OUM), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
Faculty of Applied Sciences (FTAS) Open University Malaysia (OUM), Kuala LumpurFaculty of Applied Sciences (FTAS) Open University Malaysia (OUM), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
Faculty of Applied Sciences (FTAS) Open University Malaysia (OUM), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
Faculty of Applied Sciences (FTAS) Open University Malaysia (OUM), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100609
Subject Category: Public Health
Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 7811-7820
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-11
Accepted: 2025-12-18
Published: 2025-12-26
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic reshaped higher education worldwide, creating unprecedented challenges for students, particularly those enrolled in health science programs that depend heavily on laboratory work, clinical exposure, and competency-based assessments. This study investigates the academic stressors, coping strategies, and online learning challenges experienced by Malaysian Diploma in Health Science students during the pandemic, with the goal of understanding how these factors interacted to influence student well-being and academic performance. Employing a quantitative cross-sectional design, the study collected data from 120 respondents through an online structured questionnaire that included demographic variables, standardized academic stress scales, coping behaviour indicators, and online learning experience measures. Findings indicate that academic stress remained significantly elevated throughout the pandemic, with a majority of students reporting moderate to high levels of psychological strain. Key stressors included unclear assessment expectations, increased academic workload, disrupted practical and clinical training, and difficulties adapting to rapidly shifting online learning formats. The absence of in-person laboratory and clinical sessions created substantial anxiety regarding future professional competence. Many students expressed fear of graduating without adequate practical skills, a concern intensified by inconsistent access to simulation tools and limited lecturer-student interaction in virtual environments. Technological barriers further compounded stress levels. Challenges such as unstable internet connectivity, limited access to personal digital devices, and unconducive home learning environments were widespread, particularly among students from lower-income households. These inequities not only affected academic engagement but also contributed to frustration, demotivation, and academic fatigue. Coping strategy analysis revealed that students predominantly relied on adaptive methods such as social support seeking, religious and spiritual practices, and cognitive reframing. However, a notable portion also reported maladaptive coping behaviours, including avoidance and emotional suppression, indicating deeper psychological distress. Overall, the study highlights that academic stress among health science students during the COVID-19 pandemic was multidimensional, interconnected with structural, technological, and psychological factors. The findings emphasize the urgent need for educational institutions to strengthen mental health support systems, redesign online and hybrid teaching methods, expand digital accessibility, and provide additional clinical training opportunities to rebuild student confidence. By understanding these stressors and coping patterns, policymakers and educators can develop a more resilient and equitable post-pandemic educational landscape that safeguards student well-being while ensuring academic continuity and professional readiness.
Keywords
depression, anxiety, stress, hybrid learning
Downloads
References
1. G. O. Young, “Synthetic structure of industrial plastics,” in Plastics, 2nd ed., vol. 3, J. Peters, Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964, pp. 15–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. W.-K. Chen, Linear Networks and Systems. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1993, pp. 123–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. H. Poor, An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985, ch. 4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. B. Smith, “An approach to graphs of linear forms,” unpublished. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. E. H. Miller, “A note on reflector arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., to be published. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. M. Cao, P. Wen, & H. Zhao, “Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on university students in China,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 287, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. C. Brooks et al., “The psychological impact of quarantine and isolation,” The Lancet, vol. 395, pp. 912–920, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. M. AlHadi & A. Alhuwaydi, “Prevalence of depressive symptoms post-pandemic among students,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 330, pp. 85–94, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. C. Son et al., “Stress and anxiety in university students during COVID-19,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 22, no. 9, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. T. Aristovnik et al., “Impacts of COVID-19 on student well-being and academic performance,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 20, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. R. Rahman et al., “Academic anxiety and competency concerns among medical students during COVID-19,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 21, pp. 1–9, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. T. Mustapha et al., “Academic disruptions and mental health during the pandemic,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, pp. 7559–7580, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. S. Wattick et al., “Student stress and academic exhaustion in post-pandemic transitions,” Journal of American College Health, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. N. Samsudin et al., “Effect of online learning on practical skill development among Malaysian students,” Asian Journal of University Education, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 25–38, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. M. Nagib et al., “Digital inequality and academic performance during COVID-19,” Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. R. Salimi et al., “Reliability and validity of DASS during post-pandemic recovery,” International Journal of Psychology, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Tribal Child Nutrition and Health in District of Sundargarh: A Public Health Review of ICDS Intervention
- Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Towards Prostate Cancer Screening Amongst Men Aged 40-60 Years in The Buea Health District: A Cross-Sectional Study
- Compliance with JCI Protocols: A Focus on Employee Safety
- Influence and Involvement of Teachers in Menstrual Hygiene Management of Female Secondary School Students in Kogi State, Nigeria
- A Critical Evaluation of Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana in Bihar