Academic Writing in Higher Education: A PRISMA-Guided Systematic Literature Review of Pedagogical Approaches, Challenges, Genre Practices, and Emerging Trends

Academic writing is a cornerstone of higher education, serving as a medium for knowledge construction, disciplinary communication, and scholarly dissemination. Despite extensive research, existing studies remain fragmented across pedagogical approaches, writing challenges, genre practices, and emerging technological developments. This study addresses this gap through a PRISMA-guided Systematic Literature Review (SLR) that synthesizes contemporary evidence on academic writing in higher education. Guided by four research questions, the review systematically identified, screened, and evaluated studies retrieved from the Scopus and Web of Science databases using the PRISMA framework. Following rigorous screening, eligibility assessment, and quality appraisal, 18 high-quality empirical studies published between 2021 and 2026 were included in the final analysis. The findings were organized into four major themes: (1) academic writing pedagogy, (2) challenges and perceptions, (3) academic writing genres and rhetorical features, and (4) emerging trends and collaborative practices. The review reveals that pedagogical innovation—including discipline-specific writing instruction, curriculum integration, peer-assisted learning, and writing support programmes—remains the dominant research focus. Persistent challenges such as writing anxiety, plagiarism, language proficiency, and academic conventions continue to influence students' writing performance, while genre awareness enhances disciplinary communication. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI), collaborative writing, and scholarly writing communities are transforming academic writing practices and expanding opportunities for teaching and learning. Overall, this review demonstrates that academic writing is a multidimensional construct shaped by pedagogical, psychological, rhetorical, and technological factors. The study contributes a comprehensive synthesis of current scholarship and offers evidence-based implications for educators, researchers, policymakers, and higher education institutions seeking to strengthen academic writing instruction and inform future research directions.

Academic Writing; Higher Education; Systematic Literature Review; PRISMA; Writing Pedagogy

1. Abad, J. V., & Salazar, M. F. A. (2024). Collaborative writing in higher education and its contribution to the training of teacher researchers. Forma y Función, 37(1), Article 104674. https://doi.org/10.15446/fyf.v37n1.104674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alfehaid, A., & Alkhatib, N. (2024). (Non)-conformity to native English norms in postgraduate students' writing in UK universities: Perspectives of native and non-native students and academic staff. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 24(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v24i1.562 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Auten, B., Glauner, D., Lefoe, G., & Henry, J. (2016). Educating faculty members on the importance of requiring high-quality information resources at a community college. Community & Junior College Libraries, 22(1–2), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763915.2016.1246314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Henry Holt and Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dillon, A., Chell, G., Ameri, N. A., Alsayed, N., Salem, Y., Turner, M., & Gallagher, K. (2024). The use of large language model tools such as ChatGPT in academic writing in English medium education postgraduate programs: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Educators Online, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2024.21.2.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Forero-Gómez, A., Rosado-Mendinueta, N., Jiménez, W. V., Rojas-Chávez, A., Lalinde, J. M. M., & Chirinos, M. Y. P. (2024). Writing from within: How learning to write occurs in a communication studies curriculum. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada, 40(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460X202440366879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Forero-Gómez, A., Valdez Jiménez, W., Rojas-Chávez, A., Rosado-Mendinueta, N., Benítez-Velásquez, T., Yepes-Martínez, J., Muñoz, V. J., & Pastrán Chirinos, M. Y. (2025). Exploring the role of writing in the mechanical engineering curriculum: An integrative approach. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2025.2517947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hasan, M. M., Sikder, A., & Mahmud, R. (2025). Factors influencing Bangladeshi English teachers' perceptions of academic policy, academic culture and knowledge related to plagiarism in higher education. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 47, 20–39. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2025.47.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Version 2.3, EBSE Technical Report). EBSE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mahmud, F. A., & Rahman, M. A. U. (2023). Academic writing of Saudi graduate students: Issues and improvements. Arab World English Journal, 14(1), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no1.26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mathew, P., & Sankara Narayanan, R. (2023). Implementing discipline-specific writing support for undergraduate students in the Omani context. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 11(2), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP230518034M [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nurkamto, J., Prihandoko, L. A., Putro, N. H. P. S., & Purwati, O. (2024). Academic writing apprehension in higher education: A systematic review. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(1), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i1.28928 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Odetallah, R. F. (2025). Paving the way for legal academic writing in higher education institutions. World Journal of English Language, 15(7), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n7p156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Olsson, A., & Sheridan, V. (2012). A case study of Swedish scholars' experiences with and perceptions of the use of English in academic publishing. Written Communication, 29(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311428566 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Medicina Fluminensis, 57(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Samarawickrema, N. A., Budzyn, K., & Czech, D. (2026). How do we support the scholarship of education-focused academics in research-intensive universities? A scholarly writing group model. International Journal for Academic Development, 31(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2025.2554241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Thomas, P., Khanom, N., Adelaja, A., Mehbali, M., & Lambe, S. (2022). Constructing an academic skills toolkit for embedding academic practices. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 24. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi24.832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Valerdi Zárate, J. C. (2025). Evaluative language in undergraduate academic writing: Expressions of attitude as sources of text effectiveness in English as a foreign language. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 63(2), 1139–1168. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wang, Y. A. (2023). Demystifying academic promotional genre: A rhetorical move-step analysis of teaching philosophy statements (TPSs). Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 65, Article 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wang, Y. A. (2024). Unpacking the rhetoric of diversity, equity, and inclusion statements for academic job application purposes: A step-driven rhetorical move study. English for Specific Purposes, 75, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.04.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Webb, E., Edwards, F., Harrington, Z., Middleton,E., Somekh, A., & Wijesiriwardena, T. (2023). Reflections on a peer-led writing café. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 29. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi29.1103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study