Adaptive Strategies and Teacher Effectiveness in Inclusive Private Preschools: A Klang Valley Study of Untrained Educators

Inclusive enrolment in Malaysian private preschools has expanded faster than the specialized preparation of the general educators who manage these classrooms. Guided by the Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025, children with dyslexia, speech delays, and mild autism are increasingly placed in mainstream preschool classrooms in the Klang Valley, yet most of their teachers hold general early childhood qualifications without certified special education training. This study examined the relationship between three low-cost adaptive strategies, namely environmental modifications, visual support, peer-mediated support, and self-reported teacher effectiveness in behavioral management, student safety, and syllabus delivery. Anchored in Vygotsky's scaffolding theory, the strategies were conceptualized as compensatory scaffolds that allow untrained teachers to sustain the role of the More Knowledgeable Other. A quantitative correlational design was employed, with data collected through a structured online questionnaire adapted from validated inclusive practices and teacher efficacy scales and administered to 100 purposively sampled educators in Klang Valley private preschools, 78 percent of whom held no specialized certification in special education. All scales demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .932 to .980). Pearson correlation analysis showed that visual supports (r = .876), environmental strategies (r = .659), and peer-mediated strategies (r = .572) were each significantly and positively related to teacher effectiveness (p < .001). Multiple linear regression indicated that the three strategies jointly explained 77.5 percent of the variance in teacher effectiveness, F(3, 96) = 110.07, p < .001, with visual supports emerging as the only significant unique predictor (beta = .899, p < .001). The findings suggest that visual structure is the highest-yield compensatory scaffold available to untrained teachers, and that strategy-specific professional development, rather than specialist credentialing alone, is a scalable response to the teacher preparation gap in high-ratio private preschools. Implications for preschool operators, professional development, and Malaysian inclusive education policy are discussed.

adaptive strategies, inclusive education, teacher effectiveness, private preschools, peer-mediated support

1. Al Jaffal, M. (2022). Barriers general education teachers face regarding the inclusion of students with autism. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 873248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873248 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alnahdi, G. H., & Schwab, S. (2021). Special education major or attitudes to predict teachers' self-efficacy for teaching in inclusive education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 680909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.680909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chow, J. C., & Wehby, J. H. (2018). Associations between language and problem behavior: A systematic review and correlational meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9385-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Crispel, O., & Kasperski, R. (2021). The impact of teacher training in special education on the implementation of inclusion in mainstream classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(9), 1079-1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1600590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. D'Agostino, S. R., & Douglas, S. N. (2021). Early childhood educators' perceptions of inclusion for children with autism spectrum disorder. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(4), 725-737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01108-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Finkelstein, S., Sharma, U., & Furlonger, B. (2021). The inclusive practices of classroom teachers: A scoping review and thematic analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(6), 735-762. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1572232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Garrote, A., Sermier Dessemontet, R., & Moser Opitz, E. (2017). Facilitating the social participation of pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools: A review of school-based interventions. Educational Research Review, 20, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ginner Hau, H., Selenius, H., & Bjorck Akesson, E. (2022). A preschool for all children? Swedish preschool teachers' perspective on inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(10), 973-991. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1758805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gomez-Mari, I., Sanz-Cervera, P., & Tarraga-Minguez, R. (2021). Teachers' knowledge regarding autism spectrum disorder (ASD): A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(9), 5097. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hosshan, H. (2022). Perspectives of teachers on supporting the participation of students with learning disabilities in inclusive secondary schools: A qualitative study. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 37(1), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hosshan, H., Stancliffe, R. J., Bonati, M. L., & Villeneuve, M. (2021). Peer-seating groups and social participation by students with learning disabilities in full-inclusion in Malaysian secondary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1973125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hume, K., Steinbrenner, J. R., Odom, S. L., Morin, K. L., Nowell, S. W., Tomaszewski, B., Szendrey, S., McIntyre, N. S., Yucesoy-Ozkan, S., & Savage, M. N. (2021). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism: Third generation review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(11), 4013-4032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04844-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jailani, M. A., Yusooff, F., Wong, H. S., & Wan Abas, W. M. U. (2025). A comparative analysis of counselling needs among urban and rural secondary school students in the post-COVID-19 period (July 2022 - June 2024): Implications for school counselling services. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 7(1), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15803339 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kart, A., & Kart, M. (2021). Academic and social effects of inclusion on students without disabilities: A review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Khaleel, N., Alhosani, M., & Duyar, I. (2021). The role of school principals in promoting inclusive schools: A teachers' perspective. Frontiers in Education, 6, 603241. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.603241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lee, L. W., & Low, H. M. (2014). The evolution of special education in Malaysia. British Journal of Special Education, 41(1), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lindner, K.-T., Schwab, S., Emara, M., & Avramidis, E. (2023). Do teachers favor the inclusion of all students? A systematic review of primary schoolteachers' attitudes towards inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 38(6), 766-787. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2172894 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Love, H. R., & Horn, E. (2021). Definition, context, quality: Current issues in research examining high-quality inclusive education. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 40(4), 204-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Martin, C. S. (2016). Exploring the impact of the design of the physical classroom environment on young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16(4), 280-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Meadan, H., Ostrosky, M. M., Triplett, B., Michna, A., & Fettig, A. (2011). Using visual supports with young children with autism spectrum disorder. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 43(6), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991104300603 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to post-secondary education). Ministry of Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nilholm, C. (2021). Research about inclusive education in 2020: How can we improve our theories in order to change practice? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(3), 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1754547 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. OECD. (2021). Starting strong VI: Supporting meaningful interactions in early childhood education and care. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f47a06ae-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Opoku, M. P., Cuskelly, M., Pedersen, S. J., & Rayner, C. S. (2021). Attitudes and self-efficacy as significant predictors of intention of secondary school teachers towards the implementation of inclusive education in Ghana. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(3), 673-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00490-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Petersson-Bloom, L., & Holmqvist, M. (2022). Strategies in supporting inclusive education for autistic students: A systematic review of qualitative research results. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 7, 1-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. San Martin, C., Ramirez, C., Calvo, R., Munoz-Martinez, Y., & Sharma, U. (2021). Chilean teachers' attitudes towards inclusive education, intention, and self-efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Sustainability, 13(4), 2300. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Savolainen, H., Malinen, O.-P., & Schwab, S. (2022). Teacher efficacy predicts teachers' attitudes towards inclusion: A longitudinal cross-lagged analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(9), 958-972. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1752826 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sharim, M. A., Nik Roseli, N. E., Md. Yasin, S. F., Hue, J. C. K., & Jamal Abdul Nasir, F. U. (2024). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in early childhood education: A case study in urban areas in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 6(4), 167-173. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajress/article/view/28517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sharma, U., Sokal, L., Wang, M., & Loreman, T. (2021). Measuring the use of inclusive practices among pre-service educators: A multi-national study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, 103506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103506 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Subban, P., Round, P., & Sharma, U. (2021). 'I can because I think I can': An investigation into Victorian secondary school teachers' self-efficacy beliefs regarding the inclusion of students with disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(3), 348-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1550115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. UNICEF. (2021). Seen, counted, included: Using data to shed light on the well-being of children with disabilities. United Nations Children's Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Watkins, L., O'Reilly, M., Kuhn, M., Gevarter, C., Lancioni, G. E., Sigafoos, J., & Lang, R. (2015). A review of peer-mediated social interaction interventions for students with autism in inclusive settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(4), 1070-1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2264-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Werner, S., Gumpel, T. P., Koller, J., Wiesenthal, V., & Weintraub, N. (2021). Can self-efficacy mediate between knowledge of policy, school support and teacher attitudes toward inclusive education? PLOS ONE, 16(9), e0257657. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257657 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Woodcock, S., Sharma, U., Subban, P., & Hitches, E. (2022). Teacher self-efficacy and inclusive education practices: Rethinking teachers' engagement with inclusive practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, 103802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103802 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Wray, E., Sharma, U., & Subban, P. (2022). Factors influencing teacher self-efficacy for inclusive education: A systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, 103800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103800 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Yada, A., Leskinen, M., Savolainen, H., & Schwab, S. (2022). Meta-analysis of the relationship between teachers' self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study