Administrative Leadership Practices in the Development, Monitoring, And Sustainability of the Phil-IRI Program under the MATATAG Curriculum

Authors

Aldreich Lois Genita

University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines (USTP) (Philippines)

Valentina Pallo

University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines (USTP) (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100482

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 6137-6158

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-26

Accepted: 2025-12-03

Published: 2025-12-20

Abstract

This study investigates the critical role of school administrators in the implementation of the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) within the context of the newly introduced MATATAG Curriculum. Conducted in the Tagoloan East and West Districts of the Division of Misamis Oriental, the research employed a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design to evaluate administrative strategies across three domains: Development, Monitoring, and Sustainability. Data were collected from 51 Grade 4–6 teachers through the Standard Survey Questionnaire (SSQ) and open-ended qualitative inquiries.

Keywords

Phil-IRI, Administrative Leadership, Distributed Leadership

Downloads

References

1. A Abril, A. A., et al. (2022). [The role of Phil-IRI as a diagnostic and assessment instrument in informing targeted interventions]. Adapon, A., & Mangila, R. J. (2020). [The effect of the Care for the Non-Readers (CRN) program on the reading ability of Filipino students]. Almagro, R., Flores, L. C., & Amora, M. V. (2024). [Administrative tactics for reading program sustainment in the Philippines]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. B Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1985). [Seminal work on Transformational Leadership Theory]. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. C Culduz, M. (2024). [Roles of school administrators in resource allocation and professional growth]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. D DepEd. (2023). [DepEd’s measure against systemized concerns and realignment of the curriculum]. DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2023. (2023). Rationalizing the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum and the Phased Implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum. Department of Education. DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2011. (2011). National Reading Program. Department of Education. DepEd Order No. 14, s. 2018. (2018). Policy Guidelines on the Implementation of the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI). Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. F Figuracion, J. B., & Ormilla, J. B. (2021). [Effectiveness of a library hour program in improving word reading performance among Grade V students]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. H Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). [Seminal work on Instructional Leadership Theory]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. I IIARI. (2025). [Journal article on time limitations and workload in Phil-IRI implementation]. IJARIIS. (2024). [Journal article on lack of consistent adherence to prescribed program interventions]. IJARIIS. (2025). [Journal article on the enhanced role of Phil-IRI in the MATATAG Curriculum]. IJFMR. (2025). [Journal article on inadequate instructor training and resource limitations in Phil-IRI]. IJMABER. (2025). [Journal article on the MATATAG Curriculum]. Illescas, M. A. P., & Manzano, R. C. (2023). [Challenges and practices of school-based management in public elementary schools]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. L Lindström, R., & Roberts, J. (2023). [Integrating behavioral supports with reading interventions]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. M Mangila, R. J., & Paculaba, R. A. (2020). [The role of culturally responsive teaching practices in contributing to pupils' engagement and academic achievement]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. OECD. (2018). PISA [Programme for International Student Assessment] results. OECD. (2022). PISA [Programme for International Student Assessment] results. Ormilla, J. B., & Dupra, D. M. (2023). [Readiness of higher education institutions for quality assurance]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. P Perez, J., & Lumaad, D. (2021). [Educational leadership and management approaches effect on school-based management and reading programs]. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2025). [Report on functional illiteracy among Filipino students]. Pocaan, F., et al. (2023). [Strategic reading interventions among left-behind Filipino learners]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. R ResearchGate. (2024). [Long-term readability program sustainability]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. S Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. U UNESCO. (2017). [Report on the importance of literacy as a support pillar]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. W World Bank. (2022). State of Global Learning Poverty. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles