Aerobics Instructors’ Participant-Perceived Instructor Autonomy Support and Participants’ Intrinsic Motivation for Exercise
Authors
Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management, Major in Physical Education Emilio Aguinaldo College, Manila (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200493
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 6815-6851
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-28
Accepted: 2026-03-05
Published: 2026-03-17
Abstract
The respondents are predominantly male, adult, and highly experienced aerobics instructors, indicating a mature and skilled group well-equipped to handle the demands of their profession.
Aerobics instructors generally perceive themselves as effective in supporting participant autonomy across all dimensions, particularly by explaining activity rationale, providing effort-based feedback, and fostering self-paced learning and initiative, while areas such as shared decision-making and fully acknowledging participant feelings show slight room for improvement.
Male instructors perceive themselves as more autonomy-supportive than female instructors, while the number of years of teaching experience does not significantly influence instructors’ self-assessed autonomy-supportive practices.
Participants are generally intrinsically motivated to exercise, with motivation driven mainly by a strong sense of accomplishment, persistence despite challenges, enjoyment of activities, personal progress, and self-directed engagement rather than external rewards.
Respondents’ sex significantly influences perceptions of participants’ intrinsic motivation, with male instructors consistently rating motivation higher than female instructors, while years of experience do not significantly affect these perceptions, indicating that participants are generally viewed as intrinsically motivated regardless of instructor tenure. Autonomy-supportive instruction has a strong and significant positive influence on participants’ intrinsic motivation, leading to higher enjoyment, persistence, engagement, and sense of accomplishment in exercise activities.
Keywords
Aerobics instructors, Autonomy Support in Physical Activities (Aerobics)
Downloads
References
1. Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Haerens, L. (2021). A dimensional and person-centered perspective on controlled reasons for non-participation in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 23, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.12.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Akdemir, E. (2025). The determination of teachers' motivation based on Herzberg's motivation theory. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 19(4), 89–101. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1272850 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Amorose, A. J., & Horn, D. S. (2025). Intrinsic motivation: Relationships with collegiate athletes’ gender, scholarship status, and perceptions of their coaches’ behavior. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 22, 63–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Andrew, D. (2024). The impact of leadership behavior on satisfaction of college tennis players: A test of the leadership behavior congruency hypothesis of the multidimensional model of leadership. Journal of Sport Behavior, 32, 261–277. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2022). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy‐enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158883 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2024). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045–2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Behzadnia, B., Adachi, P. J. C., & Deci, E. L. (2025). Are physical education teachers' autonomy-supportive behaviors related to high-school students’ actual game-play performance? Journal of Educational Psychology, 117(2), 123–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Benson, P. (2025). Teacher education and teacher autonomy: Creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810365236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Blömeke, S., & Klein, P. (2023). When is a school environment perceived as supportive by beginning mathematics teachers? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Effects of leadership, trust, autonomy and appraisal on teaching quality. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(4), 1029–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763013-9424-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Bray, S. R., Millen, J. A., Eidsness, J., & Leuzinger, C. (2025). The effects of leadership style and exercise program choreography on enjoyment and intentions to exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Carlson, M. D., & Morrison, R. S. (2024). Study design, precision, and validity in observational studies. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 12(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2008.9690 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Chelladurai, P. (1978). A contingency model of leadership in athletics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, Canada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Chelladurai, P. (1990). Leadership in sports: A review. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21, 328–354. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Chelladurai, P. (1993). Leadership. In R. N. Singer, M. Murphy, & L. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook on research on sport psychology (pp. 647–671). New York, NY: McMillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Chelladurai, P., & Saleh, S. D. (2025). Dimensions of leader behavior in sports. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 3, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (2024). The cultural constitution of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 378–396). Guilford Press. https://bit.ly/3dj1KUF [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Daşdan, A. E. N., Aşçı, F. H., Kazak, Z. Ç. F., & Altıparmak, M. E. (2022). The validity and reliability of the Situational Motivation Scale (SIS) for the physical education classroom environment. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000214 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/00926566(85)90023-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1990: Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). University of Nebraska Press. https://bit.ly/3xoCaEB [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press. https://bit.ly/3DpnCsf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Deng, A., Zhang, J., & Li, X. (2023). Changing trajectory of daily physical activity levels among adolescents: The role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 16949. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16949-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Diseth, Å., Breidablik, H. J., & Meland, E. (2023). Longitudinal relations between perceived autonomy support and basic need satisfaction in two student cohorts. Educational Psychology, 38(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1356448 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Engin, G. (2025). An examination of primary school students' academic achievements and motivation in terms of parents' attitudes, teacher motivation, teacher self-efficacy and leadership approach. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), 257–276. https://bit.ly/3S0E06G [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Ergür, D. O. (2025, November). The role of the teacher in gaining learner autonomy. In International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (Vol. 354, p. 359). https://bit.ly/3QBvYzW [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Escriva-Boulley, G., Tessier, D., Ntoumanis, N., & Sarrazin, P. (2023). Need-supportive professional development in elementary school physical education: Effects of a cluster-randomized control trial on teachers’ motivating style and student physical activity. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 7(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Fin, G., Moreno-Murcia, J. A., León, J., Baretta, E., & Júnior, R. J. N. (2024). Interpersonal autonomy support style and its consequences in physical education classes. PLoS ONE, 14(5), e0216609. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216609 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Flunger, B., Hollmann, L., Hornstra, L., & Murayama, K. (2022). It's more about a lesson than a domain: Lesson-specific autonomy support, motivation, and engagement in math and a second language. Learning and Instruction, 77, 101500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Frederick, C. J., & Shaw, S. M. (2025). Body image as a leisure constraint: Examining the experience of aerobic exercise classes for young women. Leisure Sciences, 17, 57–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Gil-Arias, A., Harvey, S., García-Herreros, F., González-Víllora, S., Práxedes, A., & Moreno, A. (2021). Effect of a hybrid teaching games for understanding/sport education unit on elementary students’ self-determined motivation in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 27(2), 366–383. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Gillison, F. B., Standage, M., & Skevington, S. M. (2021). Relationships among adolescents’ weight perceptions, exercise goals, exercise motivation, quality of life, and leisure-time exercise behaviour: A self-determination theory approach. Health Education Research, 21, 836–847. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2025). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005614228250 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2025). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students' motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Haerens, L., Vansteenkiste, M., De Meester, A., Delrue, J., Tallir, I., Vande Broek, G., … & Aelterman, N. (2023). Different combinations of perceived autonomy support and control: Identifying the most optimal motivating style. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(1), 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1346070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L., Hein, V., Pihu, M., Soos, I., & Karsai, I. (2022). The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings (PASSES): Development, validity, and crosscultural invariance in young people. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 632–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Han, J., & Yin, H. (2021). Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1217819. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Hinkin, T. R. (2025). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100509 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Huang, S., Zhang, J., & Wang, L. (2025). The dynamic impact of physical education teacher support on college students’ exercise adherence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 22(4), 456–467. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Ingledew, D. K., & Markland, D. (2023). The role of motives in exercise participation. Psychology & Health, 23, 807–828. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Ingledew, D., Markland, D., & Medley, A. (2023). Exercise motives and stages of change. Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 477–489. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Kauffman, D. F., Soylu, M. Y., & Bryan, D. U. K. E. (2021). Validation of the motivation to teach scale. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 40(40), 279–290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Kılınç, A. Ç., Bozkurt, E., & İlhan, H. (2023). Examination of teachers' views on teacher autonomy. Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice, 9(18), 77–98. https://bit.ly/3xj1M5O [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Kim, S., & Choi, S. (2023). Effects of instructor autonomy support on intrinsic motivation in aerobics classes: A longitudinal study. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science, 34(2), 45-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Kızıltepe, Z. (2023). Motivation and demotivation of university teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 14(5–6), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600802571361 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Klaos, H. (2022). Motivation, self-presentation and psychological needs of an amateur athlete. Faculty of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Tartu, Estonia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Knowles, A., Wallhead, T., & Readdy, T. (2023). Exploring the synergy between Sport Education and in-school sport participation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Laverie, D. (2023). Motivation for ongoing participation in a fitness activity. Leisure Sciences, 20, 277–303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Lee, H., Park, J., & Kim, Y. (2024). Cultural influences on autonomy support and intrinsic motivation in East Asian aerobics participants. Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(1), 12-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Lim, B. C., & Wang, C. J. (2024). Perceived autonomy support, behavioural regulations in physical education and physical activity intention. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Liu, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, L. (2024). The impact of autonomysupportive teaching on intrinsic motivation in Chinese aerobics classes. Journal of Asian Physical Education Research, 18(3), 6779. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Lloyd, K. M., & Little, D. E. (2025). Keeping women active: An examination of the impacts of self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and leadership on women’s persistence in physical activity. Women & Health, 50, 652–669. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Lozano-Jiménez, J. E., Huéscar, E., & Moreno-Murcia, J. A. (2021). Effects of an autonomy support intervention on the involvement of higher education students. Sustainability, 13(9), 5006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Lukner, K. (2022). Aerobics enthusiasts' training motivation and assessment of the trainer's behaviour. Faculty of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Tartu, Estonia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Matsi, J. (2024). Self-reported motivation and obstacles to leisuretime physical activity among Estonian women aged 18–50. Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu, Estonia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M. C., & Bosker, R. (2021). Teachers' instructional behaviors as important predictors of academic motivation: Changes and links across the school year. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 147–156. https://bit.ly/3db00gn [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Muftuler, M. (2021). Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Exercise Settings: Validity and reliability study for Turkish [Egzersizde Algılanan Özerklik Desteği Ölçeği: Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması]. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 2158–2169. https://bit.ly/3BE95Ye [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Muftuler, M. M., & İnce, M. L. (2025). Use of trans-contextual modelbased physical activity course in developing leisure-time physical activity behavior of university students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 121(1), 31–55. https://bit.ly/3QWFI8h [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Muñoz-Restrepo, A., Ramirez, M., & Gaviria, S. (2025). Strategies to enhance or maintain motivation in learning a foreign language. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 22(1), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v22n1.73733 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Nagovitsyn, R. S., Vaganova, O. I., Kutepov, M. M., Martyanova, L. N., Kosenovich, O. V., Moeseev, Y. V., … & Osipov, A. Y. (2025). Interactive technologies in developing student's motivation in physical education and sport. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 9(6), 72–79. https://bit.ly/3BeK9oX [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Nie, Y., Chua, B. L., Yeung, A. S., Ryan, R. M., & Chan, W. Y. (2025). The importance of autonomy support and the mediating role of work motivation for well‐being: Testing self‐determination theory in a Chinese work organisation. International Journal of Psychology, 50(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12110 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Ntoumanis, N., Moller, A. C., & Reeve, J. (2025). Self-determination theory in physical education: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 47(1), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. Nunnally, J. C. (2023). An overview of psychological measurement. In Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders (pp. 97–146). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. Oğuz, A. (2023). Teacher’s views about supporting learner autonomy. Journal of Human Sciences, 10(1), 1273–1297. https://bit.ly/3Bh1AW0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Öqvist, A., & Malmström, M. (2021). Teachers’ leadership: A maker or a breaker of students’ educational motivation. School Leadership & Management, 36(4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2016.1247039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. Paap, D., Jansen, M., & Van der Zee, E. (2025). Self-determination theory informed research for promoting motivation in physical activity and exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 56, 101112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
74. Plotnick, R. D. (2022). Adolescent expectations and desires about marriage and parenthood. Journal of Adolescence, 30(6), 943–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2016.1247039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
75. Reeve, J. (2022). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of selfdetermination research (pp. 183–203). University of Rochester Press. https://bit.ly/3dbouWN [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
76. Reeve, J., Bolt, E., & Cai, Y. (2024). Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/00220663.91.3.537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
77. Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2024). Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
78. Riemer, H. A., & Chelladurai, P. (2025). Leadership and satisfaction in athletics. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 17, 276–293. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
79. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
80. Sert, N., Adamson, J., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2022). Autonomy and European Language Portfolio Use among Turkish Adolescents [Türk Ergenlerde Özerklik ve Avrupa Dil Gelişim Dosyası Kullanımı]. Education, 37(166). https://bit.ly/3QMoQRk [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
81. Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2021). What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.80.2.325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
82. Shen, B. (2010). How can perceived autonomy support influence enrollment in elective physical education? A prospective study. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2010.10599706 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
83. Shen, B., McCaughtry, N., Martin, J., & Fahlman, M. (2024). Effects of teacher autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
84. Shen, B., McCaughtry, N., Martin, J., Garn, A., Kulik, N., & Fahlman, M. (2025). The relationship between teacher burnout and student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12089 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
85. Sinclair, C. (2023). Initial and changing student teacher motivation and commitment to teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660801971658 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
86. Sirge, K. (2023). Adaptation of the Sports Leadership Questionnaire on a Sample of Estonian Individual Athletes and Coaches. Faculty of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Tartu, Estonia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
87. Slemp, G. R., Field, J. G., & Cho, A. S. (2025). A meta-analysis of autonomous and controlled forms of teacher motivation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 121, 103459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103459 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
88. Smith, N., Tessier, D., Tzioumakis, Y., Fabra, P., Quested, E., Appleton, P., … & Duda, J. L. (2021). The relationship between observed and perceived assessments of the coach-created motivational environment and links to athlete motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 23, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
89. Standage, M., Sebire, S. J., & Loney, T. (2023). Does exercise motivation predict engagement in objectively assessed bouts of moderate-intensity exercise? A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 337–352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
90. Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2024). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
91. Su, Y. L., & Reeve, J. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 159–188. https://bit.ly/3daIKrE [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
92. Tanaka, M., & Nakamura, T. (2023). Instructor autonomy support and its effects on intrinsic motivation in Japanese aerobics participants. Asian Journal of Exercise and Sports Science, 22(4), 34-46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
93. Taşmektepligil, Y., Yilmaz, Ç., İmamoğlu, O., & Kılcıgil, E. (2021). The level of realization of physical education course objectives in primary schools. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 4(4), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
94. Tessier, D., Sarrazin, P., & Ntoumanis, N. (2025). The effect of an intervention to improve newly qualified teachers’ interpersonal style, students’ motivation and psychological need satisfaction in sport-based physical education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.05.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
95. Ushioda, E. (2021). Language motivation in a reconfigured Europe: Access, identity, autonomy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27(2), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630608668545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
96. Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2025). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
97. Wang, J., & Li, Z. (2022). Instructor-participant rapport and its influence on intrinsic motivation in Taiwanese aerobics classes. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 11(2), 89-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
98. Wanwan, Z., & Khairani, A. Z. (2025). The influence of perceived autonomy support on physical activity among high school students: The mediating roles of basic psychological needs. Behavioral Sciences, 15(4), 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040536 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
99. Yetim, E., Demir, Y., & Erturan, İ. G. (2024). Motivation in physical education lessons: The predictive effect of attitude and motivational strategies. SPORMETRE Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 12(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
100. Zhang, Q., Liu, H., & Chen, Y. (2025). Long-term effects of instructor autonomy support on exercise adherence in South Korean aerobics participants. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 32(1), 56-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar