AI-Assisted Writing: Exploring ChatGPT’s Influence on Undergraduate Writing Processes
Authors
Muhammad Wajihuddin bin Johari
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch (Malaysia)
Noran Nur Munira binti Khalili
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch (Malaysia)
Institut Pendidikan Guru, Kampus Pendidikan Islam, Bangi (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600819
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 11743-11760
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-18
Accepted: 2026-06-24
Published: 2026-07-06
Abstract
Mastering academic writing is a complex cognitive process requiring students to plan, translate ideas into text, and review their work. Recently, artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT have become popular for supporting these demanding tasks. While students use these tools to generate ideas and improve language, concerns exist regarding their continued engagement in essential cognitive writing stages. Therefore, this study explores undergraduate learners’ perceptions of the relationship between ChatGPT usage and their writing processes. A quantitative survey design was employed, collecting data through a three-section questionnaire. The study involved 162 undergraduate respondents from various academic clusters. Overall findings indicated no significant gender differences in ChatGPT usage and writing processes, though significant differences emerged among academic clusters. Additionally, correlation analysis revealed a strong positive relationship between ChatGPT use and the planning and translating stages of writing. Despite relying on the tool for drafting, students maintained critical thinking by actively verifying AI-generated information. These findings suggest that educators should transition from restricting AI tools to teaching AI literacy. Guiding students to responsibly use and evaluate AI texts will support the development of their independent cognitive skills alongside modern educational technology.
Keywords
ChatGPT, writing process, artificial intelligence, academic writing
Downloads
References
1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024). Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-Learning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Faza, A., & Lestari, I. A. (2025). Self-Regulated Learning in the Digital Age: A Systematic Review of Strategies, Technologies, Benefits, and Challenges. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(2), 23–58. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i2.8119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/356600 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Gonzalez-Garcia, A., Bermejo-Martinez, D., Lopez-Alonso, A. I., et al. (2025). Impact of ChatGPT usage on nursing students education: A cross-sectional study. Heliyon, 11, e41559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. He, L. (2024) The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study of Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Jelson, A., Manesh, D., Jang, A., Dunlap, D., Kim, Y.-H., & Lee, S. W. (2026). An Empirical Study to Understand How Students Use ChatGPT for Writing Essays. Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Khairuddin, Z, Rahmat, N.H., Noor, M.M., & Khairuddin, Z. (2021) The Use of Rhetorical Strategies in Argumentative Essays. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 29(S3), 263-285). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Levine, S., Beck, S. W., Mah, C., Phalen, L., & PIttman, J. (2024). How do students use ChatGPT as a writing support? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 68(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1373 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Melisa, R., Ashadi, A., Triastuti, A., et al. (2025). Critical thinking in the age of AI: A systematic review of AI's effects on higher education. Educational Process International Journal, 14. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.31 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Rahmat, N.H. (2021) An Investigative Study of Cognitive and Metacognitive Paraphrasing Strategies in ESL Writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 11(3), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/8919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Raoofi, S. Miri, A., Gharibi, J. & Malaki, B. (2017) Assessing and Validating a Writing Strategy Scale for Undergraduate Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol 8(3), pp 624-633. Retrieved from http://www.academypublication.com/issues2/jltr/vol08/03/23.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Sohail, A., Yousaf, M., Idrees, M., & Mushtaq, A. (2025). Integrating Technology and Self-Regulation Strategies to Enhance Learning Outcomes: A Dual-Analysis Approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 34(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2523401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Vetter, T.R. (2017) Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When, Where, and a Sixth, so What?, 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Youssef, E., Medhat, M., Abdellatif, S., & Al Malek, M. (2024) Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman, UAE. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(Dec 2024), 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey, A. E., Jennifer, M. D., Meghan, M. J., Thomas, E. K., & Marna, C., (2021) Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study