An Assessment of the Typology of World Religions: Perspective of Muslim Scholars

Authors

Adamu Musa Kotorkoshi

Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Arabic and Islamic Studies, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700768

Subject Category: Religious Studies

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 11390-11397

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-28

Accepted: 2026-08-03

Published: 2026-08-12

Abstract

The classification of world religions has long been a subject of scholarly inquiry due to the diversity of religious beliefs, practices, and historical developments. The complexity of religious traditions has resulted in different approaches to typology, with some scholars classifying religions according to their origin, geographical distribution, sacred texts, or the numerical strength of their adherents. Muslim scholars also made significant contributions to this field through systematic studies of religious traditions. This paper examines the typology of world religions from the perspective of prominent classical Muslim scholars, particularly Al-Bīrūnī, Ibn Hazm, and Al- Shahrastānī, highlighting their methods of classification and the intellectual principles underlying their approaches. It further assesses the relevance of these classical Muslim typologies in understanding contemporary religious pluralism and interreligious relations. The study adopts an analytical and historical approach, drawing on classical Islamic sources and relevant contemporary literature. It concludes that the contributions of Muslim scholars provide a comprehensive and balanced framework for the study of world religions and remain valuable for promoting scholarly understanding and constructive engagement in today's religiously diverse societies.

Keywords

Religious Typology, Muslim Scholars, World Religions, Traditional Religion

Downloads

References

1. Aasi, G. H. (1999). Muslim Understanding of other Religions: A Study of Ibn Hazm’s Kitab al-Fisal al-Milal wa al-Ahwa’ wa al-Nihal. Islamabad, Pakistan: IIIT. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Ḥilali, M. T., & Khan, M. M. (1427 A.H.). The Noble Qur'an English Translation of the Meanings and Commentary. Madinah: King Faḥad Complex. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Qurtabi, M. b. (1384/1964). Al-Jami’ Al-Ahkam Al-Qur’an (2nd ed., Vol. 12). (A. A. Barduni, & I. Atfish, Eds.) Al-Qahirah: Dar al-Kutub al-Misriyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Shahrastani, M. A. (2005). Al-Milal wa al-Nihal. Bairut Lebanon: Dar al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Tabari, M. J. (1420/2000). Jami’ al-Bayan fi Ta’wil al-Qur’an (1st ed.). (A. M. Shakir, Ed.) Mu’assasah al-Risalah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Awolalu, J. O. (1976). “What is African Traditional Religion?”. Studies in Comparative Religion, Vol.10(NO. 2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bradley, D. G. (1963). A Guide to the World Religion. U.S.A.: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fellows, W. J. (1979). Religions East and West. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hackett, C., & et-al. (December, 2012). The Global Religious Landscape: A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World’s Major Groups as of 2010. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ibn Foduye, A. (2013). Diya’u al-Mujahideen Humatu al-Din al-Rashidin (“the Light of Mujahideen” (Fighters in the Cause of Allah). In A. B. Yahaya (Ed.), Selected Writings of Shaykh Abdullahi Ibn Foduye (A. B. Luwa, Trans.). Gusau: Iqra’a Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ibn Foduye, S. U. (2013). Nur al-Albab (Enlightening Minds). In A. B. Yahaya (Ed.), Selected Writings of Shaykh Uthman Ibn Foduye (M. I. Aliyu, Trans.). Gusau: Iqra’a Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kamaruzaman, K. O. (2003). Early Muslim Scholarship in Religionswissenschaft: The Works and Contributions of Abu Rayhan Muhammad Ibn Ahmad Al-Biruni. International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM): International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Naik, Z. A. (n.d.). Concept of God in Major Religions. Islamic Research Foundation (IRF). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sharif, M. (1984). Al-Adyan fi al-Qur’an. Jidda, Saudi Arabia: Sharikatu Maktabat Ukaz. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles