An Epistemological and Socio-Political Critique of Contemporary Open-Access Publishing Platforms and Author-Centric Dissemination Models in Higher Education

This paper provides a comprehensive socio-political and epistemological critique of the contemporary global academic publishing complex, focusing on the structural transformation of knowledge dissemination within the global higher education sector. Guided by the theoretical frameworks of world-systems theory, cultural hegemony, and epistemicide, we deconstruct the political economy of multinational publishing conglomerates backed by global institutional asset managers. We argue that the widespread institutionalization of commercial metrics (e.g., CiteScore, h-index) does not measure genuine intellectual quality, but rather functions as a mechanism of bureaucratic surveillance and ideological gatekeeping. This system establishes an "epistemic monoculture" that systematically marginalizes alternative, non-linear, and indigenous knowledge paradigms of the Global South. Furthermore, we expose the "triple-pay" surplus-value extraction model, highlighting how state-funded research and voluntary academic labor are privatized to generate corporate capital, which is then sold back to public institutions. To secure national intellectual sovereignty, this paper offers strategic policy recommendations, including the systemic decoupling of academic rewards from corporate databases, the institutionalization of state-funded open-access infrastructures, and the integration of holistic paradigms such as the Eastern Yin-Yang philosophy to restore epistemological balance.

Higher Education Policy, Epistemic Imperialism, Academic Publishing Monopolies, State Sponsorship, Institutional Trap, New World Order, Corporate Metrics

1. Alatas, S. F. (2003). Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social sciences. Current Sociology, 51(6), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392103051006003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism: Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. Verso Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Buranyi, S. (2017, June 27). Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230589872 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. International Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gu, J. (2014). The Yin-Yang of knowledge management: A holistic approach to organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(4), 724–741. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Harvey, D. (2004). The 'new' imperialism: Accumulation by dispossession. Socialist Register, 40, 63–87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00496.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1). Penguin Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Odora Hoppers, C. A. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and the integration of knowledge systems: Towards a philosophy of articulation. New Africa Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Suber, P. (2012). Open access. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9286.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Tengour, S., & Alatas, S. F. (2021). Decolonizing the university: The challenge of deep dependency in global higher education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1851120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wallerstein, I. (2004). The uncertainties of knowledge. Temple University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385752 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study