An Investigation into the Determinants of Sluggish Green Building Adoption in Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia

Global concerns regarding energy conservation, climate change, and the depletion of non-renewable resources have catalysed a worldwide shift toward sustainable architecture. Despite the clear societal benefits, green building remains an uncommon practice in Malaysia due to unique market barriers prevalent in developing nations. This disparity is particularly pronounced in Ipoh; as the capital of Perak, Ipoh trails behind other Malaysian cities in Green Building Index (GBI) certifications, failing to set the necessary precedent for regional sustainable development. This study employs a qualitative methodology to investigate the factors hindering green building adoption in Ipoh. Primary data was gathered through interviews with experienced property managers and validated by two GBI-certified informants to ensure a correlation between academic literature and real-world conditions. The findings identify high material costs—driven by an insufficient local supply chain—and a shortage of specialized labour as primary "sluggishness" factors. Furthermore, the research compares theoretical demand drivers such as cost savings and prestige against practical field insights such as owner awareness and aesthetic structural design. The results confirm that the obstacles identified in the literature are deeply rooted in the practical reality of Ipoh's property sector. By bridging the gap between theory and practice, this study provides a framework for improving green building implementation, offering valuable insights for real estate stakeholders and supporting government efforts to mitigate the environmental impact of urban development.

Green Building, Sustainable Development, Green Building Sluggish

1. Abidin, N. Z. (2009). Sustainable construction in Malaysia – Developers’ awareness. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 53, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Addae-Dapaah, K., Hiang, L. K., & Sharon, N. Y. S. (2009). Sustainability of sustainable real property development. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 1(1), 203–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Addae-Dapaah, K., Li, L. S., & Attah, K. S. (2009). Sustainability of real estate: Is there a price premium for green buildings? Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 1(1), 35–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahmad, T., Thakkar, A., & Zhang, D. (2023). Transitions in sustainable property development: A review of global green building trends. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 171, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Algburi, S. M., Faieza, A. A., & Baharudin, B. T. H. T. (2016). Review of green building index in Malaysia: Existing work and challenges. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(5), 3160–3167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Aliagha, G. U., Hashim, M., Sanni, A. O., & Ali, K. N. (2013). Review of green building demand factors for Malaysia. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy, 3(11), 471–478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Azis, S. S., Mohamad, S., & Rahman, R. A. (2023). Economic barriers to green building adoption in the Malaysian property market. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 15(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Azmi, F. R., Musa, H., Abdullah, R., Othman, N. A., & Fam, S. (2017). Analyzing the awareness of green technology in Malaysia practices. Mechanical Engineering Research Day, 252–254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Baharuddin, M. N., Che-Ani, A. I., Abdullah, N. A. G., Tahir, M. M., Tawil, N. M., & Taberta, N. U. (2011). Building user manual: A vital component of the Malaysian green building index. In A. I. Che-Ani (Ed.), Recent researches in energy, environment, devices, systems, communications and computers (pp. 29–35). WSEAS Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bertrand, L. (2010, May 4–6). How can developers harvest the benefits of green buildings while reducing the risks and cost of green building accreditation [Conference session]. Conference on Sustainable Building South East Asia, Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bin Esa, M. R., Marhani, M. A., Yaman, R., Rashid, A. A. H. N. H. N., & Adnan, H. (2011). Obstacles in implementing green building projects in Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 1806–1812. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. CBRE. (2010). Who pays for green? The economics of sustainable buildings. CBRE Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chong, J. (2010, April 24). Demand for green buildings in Malaysia to rise. The Edge Property. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chong, S. X., Aziz, N. M., Zainon, N., & Loo, S. C. (2026). Barriers and strategies to accelerate green residential buildings implementation in Malaysia: Stakeholder's perspectives. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 48, 38–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Darus, Z. M., Hashim, N. A., Saleh, E., Haw, L. C., Abdul Rashid, A., & Abdul Manan, S. N. (2009). Development of rating system for sustainable building in Malaysia. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 3(5), 260–272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Doan, D. T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., Zhang, T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., & Tookey, J. (2017). A critical comparison of green building rating systems. Building and Environment, 123, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Elias, E. M., & Lin, C. K. (2015). The empirical study of green buildings (residential) implementation: Perspective of house developers. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 28, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Elias, E. M., Lin, C. K., & Hassan, N. (2021). Carbon footprint of the construction industry: A comparative analysis of emerging economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(12), 15430–15445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ezanee, M., & Chong, H. Y. (2015). Green building assessment tools: A comparison between GBI and LEED in Malaysia. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 12(2), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fadzil, A. S., Hashim, S. Z., & Yusof, M. (2024). Barriers to green technology implementation in Perak’s construction industry. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 9(2), 112–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ghazali, R., Mohammed, A. H., & Ali, M. S. (2022). The role of sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the Malaysian construction industry: A policy review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Green Building Index (GBI). (2021). Executive Summary: Certified Buildings by State and Category (September 2021 Report). GBI Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. GreenRE. (2026, January 28). Green building certifications jump 25% as adoption picks up. EdgeProp Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ha, H. S., Abdullah, A. M., & Hussein, H. (2023a). Contributing factors on the effectiveness of green building using the GBI tool. Journal of Performance of Built Environment, 13(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ha, H. S., Abdullah, A. M., & Hussein, H. (2023b). Sustainable construction trends: Assessing the growth of green buildings in Malaysia. Journal of Surveying, Construction & Property, 14(2), 12–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Halim, M. (2012). Economic issues on green office buildings in Malaysia. INSPEN. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology (IJSCET). (2025). Awareness and readiness of homebuyers toward green residential buildings in Peninsular Malaysia. UTHM Publisher. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. iProperty Malaysia. (2026, February 20). Green building in Malaysia: 15 sustainable residential developments to know in 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Jaffar, N., Affendi, N. I. N., Ali, I. M., Ishak, N., & Jaafar, A. S. (2022). Barriers of green building technology adoption in Malaysia: Contractors’ perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8), 1552–1560. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kai, T. Y., Ta, W. Z., & Hui, L. S. (2013). Environmental impact of construction activities. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 4(1), 55–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E., & Perlman, J. (2003). The costs and financial benefits of green buildings: A report to California’s Sustainable Building Task Force. Sustainable Building Task Force. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Landman, M. (1999). Breaking through the barriers to sustainable building: Insights from building professionals on government initiatives to promote environmentally sound practices [Master’s thesis, Tufts University]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Lim, C. K., Tan, K. L., & Hambira, N. (2018). An investigation on level of public awareness of green homes in Malaysia through web-based illustrations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2016(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Lop, N. S., Ismail, K., & Yunus, R. (2016). Awareness of green building construction among contractors in Malaysia. MATEC Web of Conferences, 66, 00018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Mahat, N., Idrus, A., & Yee, H. C. (2022). Barriers of green building technology adoption in Malaysia: Contractors' perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8), 1254–1268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Malaysian Green Technology and Climate Change Partnership (MGTPC). (2026, March 4). Green is the new spec: Inside Malaysia's industrial sustainability race. MGTC News. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA). (2024, December 20). Steady increase of ‘green buildings’. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Mokhtar Azizi, N. S., Wilkinson, S., & Fassman, E. (2015). Strategies for improving energy saving behaviour in commercial buildings in Malaysia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(1), 73–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Myeda, N. E., & Eliasm, E. M. (2022). Strategic management of green buildings in Malaysia: Evaluating the gap between policy and practice. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(4), 560–575. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Myeda, N. E., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., & Zaid, N. S. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of Green Building Assessment Systems in Malaysia: A decade of GBI. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(3), 482–498. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Myeda, N. E., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., Zaid, S. M., & Fong, Y. P. (2016). Sustainable housing: Demographic analysis of customers’ demands in Klang Valley. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 16(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. National Property Information Centre (NAPIC). (2020). Property Market Report 2020: Residential, Commercial and Industrial Sectors. Valuation and Property Services Department, Ministry of Finance Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Nazirah, A. Z., Nor Aini, R., & Hanizam, A. (2012). Environmental concerns in the Malaysian construction industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Ofori, G. (2000, November). Challenges of construction industries in developing countries: Lessons from various countries. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries, 15–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Ohueri, C. C., Enegbuma, W. I., & Habil, H. (2019). MyCREST embedded framework for enhancing the adoption of green office building development in Sarawak. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(2), 215–230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Ohueri, C. C., Enegbuma, W. I., & Kenley, R. (2018). Energy efficiency practices for Malaysian green office building occupants. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(2), 134–146. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Omar, M. A., Ibrahim, I. S., & Samad, A. A. (2022). Life cycle assessment of carbon emissions in Malaysian conventional housing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Omar, M. S., & Mohd-Rahim, F. A. (2020). Factors influencing the adoption of green building technologies in secondary Malaysian cities. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 11(2), 89–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Pandey, S., & Kumar, A. (2021). Energy consumption patterns in the built environment: Global trends and future projections. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Perak Sejahtera 2030. (2026). Green technology agenda: Solar and hydro initiatives. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Perak State Legislative Assembly. (2026). Perak Sejahtera 2030: Goals and success indicators. Pelan Pembangunan Perak Sejahtera. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. The Star. (2026, March 25). PMR 2026 to kick off in Ipoh with focus on sustainable cities, quality housing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). (2003). Building momentum: Trends and prospects in high-performance green buildings. USGBC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Williams, K., & Dair, C. (2007). What is stopping sustainable building in England? Barriers experienced by stakeholders in delivering sustainable developments. Sustainable Development, 15(3), 135–147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Wong, H. L., Wong, C. F., Tan, O. K., & Yap, J. B. H. (2024). Study on the benefits of the implementation of green building rating in Malaysia. Journal of The Institution of Engineers, Malaysia, 85(1), 18–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Wong, P. S., Kua, H. W., & Lim, B. C. (2021). Examining the barriers to green building implementation in developing economies: A Malaysian perspective. Sustainability, 13(11), 6021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Yap, J. B. H., Lim, J. M., Tan, O. K., Yap, W. S., & Wong, C. F. (2026). From blueprint to greenprint: Smart technologies powering sustainable construction in Malaysia. IEM Journal, 87(1), 5–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Yeo, J. Q. (2026). The adoption of green building practices in Malaysian building industry [Final Year Project, TAR UMT Institutional Repository]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Zaini, A. A., Yaakub, Z. A., Tang, A. J. S., Hisham, N. K. K., & Aziz, N. N. A. (2025). Perceived level of awareness of green residential building benefits among the homebuyers in Sarawak. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 16(3), 11–17. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/IJSCET/article/view/18342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Zainul Abidin, N., Nasir, H., & Sholeh, M. N. (2022). The evolution of green building policies in Malaysia: From NGTP to MyCREST. Sustainable Structures and Materials, 5(4), 210–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Zakaria, Z., Ariff, N. R. M., Noorhani, N. M. A., & Hussain, M. M. (2024). Sustainable green building initiatives in Malaysia: Issues in the implementation practices. Planning Malaysia, 22(1), 15–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Zuo, J., Pullen, S., Rameezdeen, R., & Bennetts, H. (2021). Green building and human well-being: A comprehensive analysis of the environmental impact of sustainable structures. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86, 106–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Case Study on the Development and Simulation of a High-Efficiency Flyback Converter for Portable Solar LED Lighting
• Greening the Campus: Stakeholders’ Insights on Sustainability Practices in a Chinese Higher Education Institution
• Malaysia’s Renewable Energy and CO₂ Emissions: ARDL–ECM Evidence with Policy and Managerial Implications
• Waqf within Business Model Framework: A Review and Research Agenda
• Sustainability-Driven Green City Framework and its Impact on Malaysia’s Tourism Industry Development