An Investigation of Group Work through the Social Cognitive Theory

Group work commonly used in educational and organizational context to stimulate collaboration, shared learning and collective problem solving. However, due to differences in behaviors, human belief and social interactions between group members, the outcome of group work may fluctuate. This study aimed to explore group work through social cognitive theory. A quantitative approach was employed with 404 participants from a local university responding to the 5 Likert-scale survey that is rooted from Studnicka (2023) and Bateman, et. al. (2002). In general, learners had positive insight in terms of environmental, behavioral and personal factors. Findings reveal that to build an effective group work, clear goals, clear roles, good teamwork and learner confidence are needed. In conclusion, the finding parallels Social Cognitive Theory by revealing how these factors work together to influence group work. The findings suggest that language teachers should design group work with clear goals, defined roles, and supportive interaction to improve collaboration, learner confidence, and learning outcomes. The findings of this study bear interesting implications in the use of group work in the classroom.

Social Cognitive Theory, group work, language learning

1. Adam, M. (2024). Perception and interpretation of team development phases and their changes: Factors influencing team development. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 37, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, N., Alias, F. A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S. A. (2024). Reliability analysis: Application of Cronbach’s alpha in research instruments. SIG: E-Learning@CS, 114–119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aikens, E. O., Nourani, E., Fiedler, W., Wikelski, M., & Flack, A. (2024). Learning shapes the development of migratory behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(12), e2306389121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2306389121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Almayez, M. A., Al-khresheh, M. H., AL-Qadri, A. H., Alkhateeb, I. A., & Alomaim, T. I. M. (2025). Motivation and English self-efficacy in online learning applications among Saudi EFL learners: Exploring the mediating role of self-regulated learning strategies. Acta Psychologica, 254, 104796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104796 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bateman, B., Wilson, F. C., & Bingham, D. (2002). Team effectiveness—development of an audit questionnaire. Journal of Management Development, 21(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710210420291 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Costley, J. (2021). How role taking in a group work setting affects the relationship between the amount of collaboration and germane cognitive load. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239 021 00259 w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Egolf, R. S. (2022). Exploration of Tuckman’s model of group development: Perceived applications and prevalence among adventure education practitioners [Doctoral dissertation, Prescott College]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. He, L. (2024). The application of SPSS correlation analysis in the study of precision teaching of English in universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hoehn, J. R., Gifford, J. D., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2020). Epistemic stances toward group work in learning physics: Interactions between epistemology and social dynamics in a collaborative problem solving context. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.02425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ismail, H. B., Hasan, A. C., Sharipudin, S. S., Yusof, N. A. U., & Rahim, N. R. B. A. (2024). Exploring the influence of Social Cognitive Theory on online group work. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(8), 2664–2678. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2014). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (11th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 85–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kadar, N. S. A., Yadri, W. S. W., Faris, N. D., Johari, M. D. M., Nurgeldiyevna, K. N., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). Exploring online group work through the Social Cognitive Theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(9), 1684–1698. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lin, Y., Mohamad, M., & Mahmud, M. I. (2025). Exploring the relationship between English-speaking self-efficacy and English learning motivation among polytechnic EFL learners. Arab World English Journal, 16(1), 55–69. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol16no1.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rahmat, N. H., Aripin, N., Razlan, A., Arepin, M., Mohandas, E. S., & Sim, M. K. (2021). Analyzing the cadence of group conflicts across gender during online learning. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 6(2), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v6i2.3886 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Studnicka, K., Zarzycka, D., & Zalewski, J. (2023). Student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning scale (SSCL)—reliability and validity test of the Polish version. Signa Vitae, 19(5), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.22514/sv.2023.069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Vetter, T. R. (2017). Descriptive statistics: Reporting the answers to the 5 basic questions of who, what, why, when, where, and a sixth, so what? Anesthesia & Analgesia, 125(5), 1797–1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zhang, F., & Xu, H. (2025). Exploring foreign language learners’ cognitive motivation in the learning process and subsequent language use. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1295. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05683-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zhang, Q., & Shakibaei, G. (2025). Using social reinforcement in online language learning to foster motivation through self-determination theory. Scientific Reports, 15, 34944. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18953-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey, A. E., Dykema, J. M., Jensen, M. M., Konkel, T. E., & Cyphers, M. (2021). Impact of demographic survey questions on response rate and measurement: A randomized experiment. Survey Practice, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar