Analyzing the Least Mastered Competencies in Chemical Reactions Among Grade 10 Learners

Authors

Adzriana S. Jariun

Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Science and Mathematics Education College of Education (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600634

Subject Category: Chemistry

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 9073-9078

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-08

Accepted: 2026-07-13

Published: 2026-07-01

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the least mastered competencies in chemical reactions among Grade 10 learners. Specifically, it sought to determine the learners’ performance in chemical reactions, and identify the least mastered competencies in a chemical reaction. The study employed a quantitative descriptive research design using a competency-based questionnaire developed from the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs) in Chemical Reactions. The questionnaire covered balancing chemical equations, types of chemical reactions, examples of chemical reactions, and the law of conservation of mass. A total of 150 Grade 10 learners from different sections one of a public school in Jolo, Sulu participated in the study during the School Year 2025–2026. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and Mean Percentage Score (MPS). The results revealed that most learners (96.67%) obtained scores within the “Did Not Meet Expectation” level, indicating low mastery of chemical reaction competencies. Among the competencies assessed, Balancing Chemical Equations was identified as the least mastered competency, with an MPS of 22.31. This was followed by Types of Chemical Reactions (24.62) and Examples of Chemical Reactions (24.67), both interpreted as Low Mastery. Conservation of Mass obtained the highest MPS of 25.07 and was interpreted as Average Mastery. The study concludes that Grade 10 learners demonstrated limited mastery of competencies in chemical reactions, particularly in balancing chemical equations. The results emphasize the need for strategic instructional support and targeted intervention to enhance learner understanding in these critical areas of chemistry.

Keywords

balancing chemical equation, chemical equation

Downloads

References

1. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans, Green and Co. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bybee, R. W., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. A. (2014). Chemistry (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry—Logical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1039/A9RP90001B [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Magwilang, E. B. (2016). Teaching chemistry in context: Its effects on students’ motivation, attitudes and achievement in chemistry. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(4), 60–68. https://ijlter.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2013). TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships among achievement, curriculum, and instruction. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Viking Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Taber, K. S. (2013). Chemical misconceptions: Prevention, diagnosis and cure. Royal Society of Chemistry. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles